Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,159
» Latest member: akter
» Forum threads: 6,082
» Forum posts: 51,259
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 619 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 614 Guest(s) Baidu, Bing, Facebook, Google, Yandex
|
Latest Threads |
Supercharge Your Sales: S...
Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
Last Post: akter
57 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 5
|
80503pb01 lute instrument...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: N. W. Perry
Yesterday, 14:24
» Replies: 9
» Views: 5,862
|
Parts we are Working on -...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Jeff Jones
Yesterday, 10:14
» Replies: 158
» Views: 150,774
|
Modulex parts
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
2025-07-15, 20:30
» Replies: 31
» Views: 4,365
|
Same set, different sheet...
Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
Last Post: Magnus Forsberg
2025-07-15, 6:15
» Replies: 8
» Views: 371
|
71613/30346c01 too high?!
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
2025-07-14, 23:21
» Replies: 18
» Views: 4,778
|
5724pr0001 Bubble Canopy ...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: SNIPE
2025-07-12, 21:08
» Replies: 2
» Views: 345
|
Friends 2014
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2025-07-11, 16:20
» Replies: 18
» Views: 17,119
|
LDCAD about Add custom p...
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Nate87
2025-07-11, 8:13
» Replies: 5
» Views: 3,265
|
Hi-res logo primitives
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Jens Brühl
2025-07-10, 20:40
» Replies: 16
» Views: 2,076
|
|
|
L3P and LGEO in Linux Issue |
Posted by: Jude Parrill - 2011-12-11, 12:15 - Forum: LDraw File Processing and Conversion
- Replies (7)
|
 |
OK, so I was attempting to use the Linux version of L3P to convert an MPD into a POV-ready file for rendering, when I noticed an inordinate amount of files were not being found. Worse yet, a lot of the files that supposedly weren't being found seemed parts that should be there. Here's a small sampling of the parts not being found:
Not in LGEO: 3034.dat Plate 2 x 8
Not in LGEO: 3023.dat Plate 1 x 2
Not in LGEO: 3020.dat Plate 2 x 4
Not in LGEO: 3022.dat Plate 2 x 2
Not in LGEO: 3710.dat Plate 1 x 4
Not in LGEO: 3031.dat Plate 4 x 4
So I looked into it, and found out those files DO EXIST in my lgeo library, so now I was really perplexed. Now, it would be one thing of no files were being found, but according to the end summary, 14 files were found, so clearly it isn't completely screwed up.
Furthermore, my "lgeo" file is in my LDraw folder, and I get the same files missing message whether I set the LGEODIR environmental variable or not (I use a script which sets it). In fact, the only way I could get a complete failure was to purposely set the LGEODIR to a wrong directory, which led to an expected "cannot find lg_elements.lst" error.
My question, then, is what am I doing wrong? Clearly L3P at least knows the lg_elements.lst and lg_colors.lst are, or it would be throwing errors about that at me. It's also finding some, but not all, parts. I'm really baffled right now, and any help would be welcome.
|
|
|
RSS feed - posts relationship |
Posted by: Steffen - 2011-12-10, 21:55 - Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hi,
I just want to point out some small screw which I think is missing in the setup of the forum's RSS feed:
I personally find the subject line of posts very useful:
ideally, they sum up a post, so a reader can follow a thread roughly without having to read
each and every post. Here is an example (just the subject lines given):
Code: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
That feature is already present as ABC.
No, it is not - technical explanation
Do we need XYZ at all
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
How can we technically add feature XYZ?
Suggestion 1
Suggestion 2
Suggestion 3
Here's how the same looks if not using the subject line as sum-up:
Code: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
Re: Re: Cool idea about adding feature XYZ.
I find the second instance pretty useless. To see what actually happened in the thread,
I have to read all posts.
This is the reason why I usually write the subject line last when composing a post here,
to let it sum up the contents of the post.
Now here's the missing screw: the RSS feed of the forums does not seem to insert the necessary XML elements
which relate one post to its parent.
Instead, the relationship will only be correctly shown if people keep the subject line and just add a "Re:" in front.
This is a little sad IMHO. Philo told me about this, I don't know which RSS reader he's using, but I think
a little massage of the output RSS XML stream should be able to cure this.
Is anybody willing or able to shed some more light into this?
It would be nice if RSS readers would show related posts correctly,
even if their subject line is different than the one of the original post it replies to.
|
|
|
Persistent forum logins gone? |
Posted by: Jean-Philippe Ouellet - 2011-12-10, 20:10 - Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
- Replies (9)
|
 |
Did someone recently change cookies from expiring on a certain date to lasting for one browser session?
I'm pretty sure its not just my browser because four browsers across two systems all report the forum login cookie being valid only for the current login session, whereas before they were set to expire at a set date far (I forget exactly when) in the future, while those same browsers also have cookies that were set a long time ago and will be valid for a long time, and I haven't changed settings on any of those four (different) browsers recently. So I'm pretty sure a setting was changed in the forum software.
If I am mistaken and I am the only one exhibiting this behavior, then please excuse me and ignore this post. If not, I would appreciate it if we could still have persistent logins back, even if the cookies expire sooner.
If it is a question of security (people stealing cookies from logins on public computers, and then impersonating us on the forums), then perhaps could we have an option when logging in to set the duration of the session?
|
|
|
|