Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 4,999
» Latest member: TSAI
» Forum threads: 5,996
» Forum posts: 50,721
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 532 online users. » 2 Member(s) | 525 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, Yandex, Franklin W. Cain, stas1999
|
|
|
LDView POV Export again |
Posted by: Tore Eriksson - 2011-11-29, 5:29 - Forum: LDraw File Processing and Conversion
- Replies (6)
|
 |
How come 3024.dat is exported as LDX_3024_dot_dat,
while 3008.dat becomes LDX_3008_dot_dat_sub_part?
This makes it impossible to create generic Datshine Attribute files compatible with LDView POV export.
And yes, I use unmodified, official versions:
3024.dat - !LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2002-03
3028.dat - !LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2004-03
/Tore
|
|
|
LDraw IRC channel |
Posted by: Jean-Philippe Ouellet - 2011-11-29, 4:31 - Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Would there be any interest in having an LDraw IRC channel?
I found one Tim created a long time ago but it's long dead.
I can see the potential for more in-depth discussions between LDraw software developers/users and discussions among PT admins about specific parts.
A real-time discussion format would allow for a higher level of discourse that would not be otherwise happen due to the long delays between post/read times between LDraw users.
There is also the disadvantage of these communications not being logged and thus matters discussed would not be on public record for reference by those who come after. Although a bot could easily log the public channel and publish it someplace, private discussions between two people would be nowhere to be found, and so it would not be ideal. For instance, I like how the LSC has done everything publicly so I was able to catch up on what I missed, if some of the debates had happened over IRC, I might not have been able to understand why some decisions were made because I could not find record of them, so we as a community would need to be careful about what discussions we have on IRC and publish transcripts of them if something noteworthy was concluded.
Just thought I'd throw the idea out there.
|
|
|
Any desire for an "Off Topic" forum? |
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2011-11-29, 1:03 - Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
- Replies (10)
|
 |
I think I'd like to add an off topic forum. I sometimes have technical question that aren't necessarily LDraw related that I know a lot of the regulars here can answer. It would at worst save me a frustration Google search. Of course any off topic forum will be heavily moderated and flame wars, etc... would be ruthlessly terminated.
|
|
|
[SR 3D Builder] Request and question |
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2011-11-29, 0:59 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Feature request:
- MPD model support. Too late into my authoring of the Super Star Destroyer did I find out that SR 3D Builder doesn't apper to support MPD models. If it does, it's not readily apparent.
Quesiton:
- Is there a good usage tutorial for using this program? The user manual was decent at explaining how to edit and move parts around but less helpful in how to move the camera around.
|
|
|
Implement a maximum embedded image size |
Posted by: Tim Gould - 2011-11-28, 23:13 - Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
- Replies (20)
|
 |
Personally I've always got a bit annoyed seeing embedded images larger than about 500x500px. They take up too much screen real estate and, more importantly, make browsing on small screen devices like phones very difficult. Not to mention the excessive bandwidth.
So I'd like to see a maximum size limit imposed on them. Whether by request or software.
Tim
|
|
|
Make Announcements open to response |
Posted by: Tim Gould - 2011-11-28, 23:09 - Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
- Replies (2)
|
 |
I think that it might be a good idea to open Annoucements to responses. We've already got a place to make announcements that can't be responded to (on the website) and, many of the topics we've opened have to be duplicated elsewhere for further discussion (most recently by Travis).
I'm not saying anyone would be able to start a topic there, but I do think allowing responses would be a good thing.
Tim
|
|
|
|