| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 6,230
» Latest member: Miller
» Forum threads: 6,618
» Forum posts: 54,426
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 7 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 1 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Facebook, Google, Rami Mahdi
|
| Latest Threads |
Brick built MODOK face?
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Chris Matteson
4 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 80
|
2021 - 75313-1 AT-AT - UC...
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Mayo
8 hours ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 3,532
|
10179 UCS Millennium Falc...
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Mayo
10 hours ago
» Replies: 32
» Views: 79,936
|
Missing Stingrays/Hydrona...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Zack Uhlenhuth
2026-11-07, 0:18
» Replies: 13
» Views: 3,054
|
New parts added manually,...
Forum: Help
Last Post: von_Erics
2026-11-06, 1:41
» Replies: 7
» Views: 1,147
|
Technic 1994
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Max Martin Richter
2026-11-05, 12:40
» Replies: 42
» Views: 75,664
|
Eyes from set 21371 (Wall...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Alfred Schmitz
2026-11-05, 12:18
» Replies: 2
» Views: 588
|
Stingray/Hydronaut, missi...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Zack Uhlenhuth
2026-11-04, 4:40
» Replies: 0
» Views: 271
|
LDCad 1.7 Beta 2b (win+li...
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
2026-11-04, 0:30
» Replies: 13
» Views: 5,350
|
Aquazone 1995-1996
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2026-11-03, 17:40
» Replies: 5
» Views: 2,597
|
|
|
| Parts Tracker |
|
Posted by: Michael Heidemann - 2012-12-26, 18:36 - Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
- Replies (6)
|
 |
It would be very helpful if the PT reports in any case the occurence of a given filename in the official library such as:
Code: However, 52031.dat does exist in the Official LDraw Parts library.
Today we get this information only if no entry on the PT matches the search criteria.
I would like to see this information if I enter a number with or without the extension.
|
|
|
| LSynth result dependent on absolute position |
|
Posted by: Ignacio Fernandez Galvan - 2012-12-26, 15:16 - Forum: All Other Programs.
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Consider this simple file:
Code: 0 SYNTH BEGIN ELECTRIC_CABLE 7
0 SYNTH SHOW
1 1 40 10 0 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 1 LS04.dat
1 1 10 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 1 LS04.dat
1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 1 LS04.dat
0 SYNTH END
0 SYNTH BEGIN ELECTRIC_CABLE 7
0 SYNTH SHOW
1 1 40 10 500 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 1 LS04.dat
1 1 10 0 500 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 1 LS04.dat
1 1 0 0 500 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 1 LS04.dat
0 SYNTH END
The two portions are exactly the same, the second is just displaced +500z. When processed with LSynth, however, the first portion generates only 24 lines, while the second generates 2911 lines!
I guess this is due to rounding errors and matrix transformations being referred always to (0,0,0), but can it be fixed (other than by splitting the code in two parts)?
|
|
|
| Nomenclature for tyres |
|
Posted by: Max Martin Richter - 2012-12-24, 14:20 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (6)
|
 |
Hej,
yesterday, I got a copy of the Power Pull set and just for fun I have looked into our library, if the BIG tyre is available. I found it, but it has an odd name.
I left a comment on the part's page. Steffen BFC'ed the file in the meantime - thanks for that.
Now I was looking for the right name. I checked the wiki and the old Lugnet entries.
And I found out, that our naming system is a bit chaotic (for me). Sometimes it is like the version in our wiki and sometimes it starts with the diameter (like on some Lego tyres). I have checked the rim for the tyre, too. Here it is the same. It doesn't correspond with the wiki.
And another thing: I have no idea, where I should do the measurement at the tyre. At the widest width, at the inside width (because it's a balloon), should I include the bead for the rim in the "percentage" measurement or not and and and.
It would be really great if we could find a way to describe this in a good way.
/Max
|
|
|
| Merry Christmas |
|
Posted by: Max Martin Richter - 2012-12-24, 10:02 - Forum: Off-Topic
- Replies (6)
|
 |
Hej,
I want to wish everybody in the LDraw community a Merry Christmas - especially to the admin, the programmers and the part authors.
I'm not sure where all these persons come from. So I write the main fact in the languages, from which I know, that somebody is participating here.
- Merry Christmas
- Joyeux Noël
- God Jul
- Vrolijk Kerstfeest
- Buon Natale
- Feliz Navidad
- Fröhliche Weihnachten
and of course the language of the home country of TLG ;-)
/Max
|
|
|
| Acceptable vertex mismatch error |
|
Posted by: Paul Griffin - 2012-12-20, 7:37 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (4)
|
 |
For parts 2997 and 2998, I have noticed many edges that simply don't match up. In one case, two "identical" vertices overlap by .09 u; in another, there is about a .07 u gap. Without the ability to identify edges, I am unable to smooth normals, and I'm certain I will encounter other side effects.
Should I consider such a mismatch to be /too large/ and request/submit a part update, or should I instead implement some kind of vertex snapping tool? Or should I do both?
It would be useful information if there is some standard on identifying identical vertices, or, at the least, on the minimum acceptable feature size (minimum length of any polygon edge).
|
|
|
| Export of .mpd to single 'stand-alone' .ldr file ? |
|
Posted by: Rob - 2012-12-19, 20:42 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (26)
|
 |
Hi,
Can anyone point me in the direction of an application or utility which will take a multi-part ldraw file (i.e. an .mpd file) and convert it into a single 'standalone' LDR file ?
i.e. something which takes an mpd file and outputs the 'absolute' position and rotation of each part in the model referenced to the origin - not to another part of the model.
Hope that makes sense...
I've had a go writing a conversion myself but got bogged down - has to be recursive I think for multiple 'nested' models.
If no such thing exists could any one give me some tips (not code necessarily) but the method I would need follow to acheive what I'm after ?
Thanks.
Rob @ TCBUK
|
|
|
|