Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 4,438
» Latest member: lego
» Forum threads: 5,673
» Forum posts: 48,473
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 301 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 295 Guest(s) Applebot, Bing, Facebook, Google, Yandex, Chris Böhnke
|
Latest Threads |
Rubber DBG missing from L...
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Willy Tschager
5 hours ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 56
|
Plug34.dat and related pa...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Javier Orquera
9 hours ago
» Replies: 14
» Views: 5,913
|
Trying to find multiple p...
Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
Last Post: Jeff Jones
Yesterday, 11:09
» Replies: 3
» Views: 89
|
Part Request: BEAST'S HAI...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: 3CFigs
2024-09-27, 23:00
» Replies: 0
» Views: 208
|
[LDPE] 1.8.89 Released (b...
Forum: Parts Author Tools
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
2024-09-27, 18:18
» Replies: 1
» Views: 58
|
5555 - Flag 3 1/2 x 2 Tri...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
2024-09-27, 16:42
» Replies: 2
» Views: 93
|
Town and Trains 1993
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2024-09-27, 16:03
» Replies: 29
» Views: 17,922
|
Using downloaded .dat fil...
Forum: Help
Last Post: Lawford
2024-09-26, 20:53
» Replies: 4
» Views: 246
|
[LDPE] 1.8.88 Released (h...
Forum: Parts Author Tools
Last Post: Magnus Forsberg
2024-09-26, 19:27
» Replies: 9
» Views: 228
|
Technic 2024
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
2024-09-26, 14:17
» Replies: 16
» Views: 15,163
|
|
|
Part reviewing tutorial and checklist |
Posted by: Jim DeVona - 2011-08-05, 22:56 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (3)
|
|
Discussion here has encouraged me to [re]start reviewing parts in the tracker. If you're interested in doing the same, you may not be sure how to start, so I thought I'd share some helpful links and ideas.
Neils Bugge has written a pretty nice comprehensive tutorial about reviewing LDraw parts. He describes what to look for and some good tools to use.
I find it helpful to have a list of specific things to check every time I go through a process like this. Following Neils' example, I think there are two basic types of tests: using various programs to help check for technical errors, and inspecting the part visually to look for more subtle or subjective issues. Here's my checklist:
- Does it look like the physical part? Right type of studs, clips, etc.? Are the dimensions right? (Bricksmith will report real-world dimensions. Other programs will give the bounding box in LDraw units, too.)
- Is the origin and orientation of the part sensible and consistent with similar parts? (Using the "Show Axes" option in LDView or L3Lab is useful for this comparison.)
- Does LDView report any errors or warnings?
- Does L3P report any errors? ("l3p -check PARTFILENAME.dat" )
- Does Planarcheck report any problems? ("planarcheck PARTFILENAME.dat" )
- Inspect with BFC color coding in LDView or L3Lab - are any back (red) surfaces visible?
- Check for proper stud orientation by rendering with L3P or enabling stud logos in LDView.
- Check for appropriate coordinate precision and number format (leading/trailing zeros, etc. See spec.)
- Does the part make use of relevant primitives (stud groups, boxes, clips, pins, etc.)? (Note my opinion that if everything else listed above checks out, it should be OK to certify a part even if could still be refactored for better efficiency or performance. As Willy points out in reply, this is what the "needs work" label is for. I think it's important to utilize this option to get new parts out to users promptly.)
I encourage more experienced part reviewers to chime in with additional advice. Note that I've only included Mac-compatible software in my list - as Neils' tutorial mentions, Windows users will want to employ MLCad and LDDP.
Last but not least, to review parts you need to get reviewer privileges for your LDraw.org account. Hopefully someone can explain that process as well - it seems a bit like a "you need to know somebody who knows somebody" process, if I recall correctly.
|
|
|
[Sticky] LEGO Color Overview / Comparison / Charts |
Posted by: Steffen - 2011-08-05, 14:34 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (19)
|
|
I would like to stick this post here
so we can start a collection of LEGO color comparison charts here.
There's frequently confusion about slight variations of the color codes,
and sometimes it is good to have different sources.
If you know a good comparison chart, preferably including part photos for examples,
reply to this message.
(Please put a clear, meaningful title to your post, to make it show up usefully in this list of posts.)
|
|
|
recommendation: use a source code revision control tool for your LDRAW folder |
Posted by: Steffen - 2011-08-04, 10:49 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (2)
|
|
As a followup to this post
http://forums.ldraw.org/showthread.php?t...250#pid250
, I'd like to recommend a thing which proves quite valuable for me during parts (and even model) authoring:
using a source code revision control software (SCM tool) for the LDRAW folder.
Such tools are for example:
* Perforce
* git
* hg
* svn
* cvs
(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_Code_Management for more information)
I personally use and like Perforce;
note that for private use you are allowed to install a local server and client for yourself.
I put my LDRAW folder into that system the following way:
- install initial set of parts
- checkin into SCM
- install 1st update
- checkin into SCM
- install 2nd update
- checkin into SCM
...
- install update 2011-01
- checkin into SCM
Doing it this way gives you a full history of parts: For each and every file,
you can easily see by which update it has been touched, and which changes happened in it.
As I am also keeping all unofficial stuff in the MODELS folder (because the "real" contents of that folder
is not important for me), I'm also checking in that MODELS folder into the SCM tool.
(I'm using the MODELS folder and not UNOFFICIAL or similar, because older tools like L3P only work that way).
This allows me to go forward and backward with the changes which I do in the files.
So I this way got rid of having to keep manual backup files etc.:
the SCM tool does everything for me.
I'm just dropping this idea here in case somebody else also needs or likes it.
Play well -
Steffen
|
|
|
Part authoring scripts and tools |
Posted by: Tim Gould - 2011-08-03, 23:07 - Forum: Parts Author Tools
- Replies (7)
|
|
Hi All,
Sometimes I find it hard to keep track of all the little programs for part authoring: things like 'inliner' and Philo's myriad of tricky tools. Could we keep a master list of them in this thread?
It also allows me (and others) to share scripts that we wouldn't upload to the master software list. As I will do in a few seconds.
Tim
|
|
|
|