Parts Tracker - Respond to Comments w/o Resubmit? - Printable Version +- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org) +-- Forum: Administrative (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: Parts Tracker - Respond to Comments w/o Resubmit? (/thread-3681.html) |
Parts Tracker - Respond to Comments w/o Resubmit? - Greg Teft - 2012-03-09 I can't locate contact info for a reviewer, and don't want to get in the habit of cluttering the Authoring/Standards forum with review correspondence. Could there be a way to answer a review without resubmitting, or providing a sub-forum for per-file discussions, encouraging reviewers to look there for any counter-arguments? Or, is the Authoring/Standards forum already expected to serve this purpose? Re: Parts Tracker - Respond to Comments w/o Resubmit? - Orion Pobursky - 2012-03-09 Greg Teft Wrote:Or, is the Authoring/Standards forum already expected to serve this purpose?Yes, that's acceptable. But I think novotes are good enough and keeps the discussion on tracker. Or am I missing something? Re: Parts Tracker - Respond to Comments w/o Resubmit? - Tim Gould - 2012-03-09 For one part issues just use a 'novote' to make your point. I think if it's a general issue, it's worth raising on the PT with a 'novote' linking to a bigger discussion elsewhere. Sometimes good discussions get lost on the PT so if something applies to more than 1 or 2 parts, it's probably worth raising in the forums. No matter what I think that private discussion is a bad thing and certainly wouldn't endorse the sharing of contact information. Tim Re: Parts Tracker - Respond to Comments w/o Resubmit? - Greg Teft - 2012-03-10 thought I had to be a reviewer to review - guess I can review my own - didn't think to try that o_O. thanks all. Re: Parts Tracker - Respond to Comments w/o Resubmit? - Tim Gould - 2012-03-10 I had always assumed that being a creator also gained you reviewer privileges. But perhaps I'm wrong. Tim |