| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
Discussion - proposal to ...
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: N. W. Perry
23 minutes ago
» Replies: 55
» Views: 6,185
|
Technic 1993
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
4 hours ago
» Replies: 4
» Views: 7,333
|
2026/2027 LDraw.org Steer...
Forum: LDraw.org Announcements
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
4 hours ago
» Replies: 50
» Views: 6,196
|
Parts request, set 42224,...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Alfred Schmitz
5 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 56
|
Parts request 7656, 7658 ...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Alfred Schmitz
5 hours ago
» Replies: 4
» Views: 501
|
Animal minifigure heads l...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Magnus Forsberg
5 hours ago
» Replies: 19
» Views: 16,938
|
New Community System Soon...
Forum: All Other Programs.
Last Post: Demetree Kallergis
Yesterday, 14:04
» Replies: 8
» Views: 349
|
4.5L technic axle and new...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
Yesterday, 13:29
» Replies: 7
» Views: 906
|
2026 - New Parts -> Raw M...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
Yesterday, 10:50
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,399
|
ModelScope XR - VR model ...
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Carlos Antelo
Yesterday, 2:17
» Replies: 1
» Views: 159
|
|
|
| Thinking about LDCad 2.0 and open sourcing it |
|
Posted by: Roland Melkert - 2016-05-29, 19:08 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (21)
|
 |
Hi all,
Currently I haven't much time to work on LDCad 1.6 but I can't help thinking about the next next version which might be 2.0.
This would also be the perfect moment to go open source.
I consider switching to JAVA or PYTHON but I think both are too slow and JAVA is also a bit messy imho.
So it probably be C++(11) again. If so it will reuse large chunks of the current 1.6 code but in a reworked state.
If I go open source I would also need to select a License (I would like to keep it non commercial only)., this is the thing I'm looking up to the most so if anyone has some pointers on that
Also I'm wondering if there are people who would be interested to help development by taking up e.g. the mac version dependencies etc.
One major improvement planned would be the rendering of the gui (I want to go full OpenGL with this, even for dialogs) and I also want it be multilingual.
An actual usable 2.0 will probably take more then a year to make after actually starting it, so I might do a parallel 1.7
Any thoughts / feedback on this?
|
|
|
| Application Developer Tag |
|
Posted by: Trevor Sandy - 2016-05-26, 6:28 - Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
- Replies (8)
|
 |
Admins. This is just a suggestion. Like Part Authors, does it not make sense to add a tag/designation to your community members who are also Application Developers ? It would be better if all contributors identified or even if those whose applications are included in the AIOI. Cheers.
|
|
|
| LEGO pop-up castle |
|
Posted by: Travis Cobbs - 2016-05-25, 22:02 - Forum: Off-Topic
- No Replies
|
 |
The English description seems to claim no glue, when it says, "The adhesive does not use," but I'm not sure if I believe it. It would be impressive even with glue.
|
|
|
| Submodels and callouts? |
|
Posted by: Jake Hansen - 2016-05-23, 16:59 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (8)
|
 |
[img]file:///C:/Users/Jake/Desktop/Capture.PNG[/img]Hi,
I am new to Ldraw and I am having trouble creating 'callouts'. I need to be able to create substeps or submodels in the instructions. I have attched a picture of what I am trying to get. I don't know how to set it up in Leocad (or MLcad), and I don't know how to set it up in Lpub3.
Please help!
|
|
|
|