Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,152
» Latest member: DKumar
» Forum threads: 6,080
» Forum posts: 51,235
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 541 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 536 Guest(s) Baidu, Bing, Google, Yandex, Jeff Jones
|
Latest Threads |
5724pr0001 Bubble Canopy ...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: SNIPE
10 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 130
|
Modulex parts
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
Yesterday, 11:38
» Replies: 26
» Views: 3,963
|
Parts we are Working on -...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Jeff Jones
Yesterday, 11:23
» Replies: 157
» Views: 149,761
|
Friends 2014
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2025-07-11, 16:20
» Replies: 18
» Views: 16,592
|
LDCAD about Add custom p...
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Nate87
2025-07-11, 8:13
» Replies: 5
» Views: 3,159
|
Hi-res logo primitives
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Jens Brühl
2025-07-10, 20:40
» Replies: 16
» Views: 1,069
|
Part 5561, Door 1 x 4 x 1...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
2025-07-10, 9:55
» Replies: 1
» Views: 271
|
LDConfig Update: More dis...
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Jeff Jones
2025-07-09, 20:46
» Replies: 7
» Views: 497
|
bizzare minifig variants
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Jeff Jones
2025-07-09, 11:11
» Replies: 0
» Views: 123
|
Wookiees!
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Jeff Jones
2025-07-08, 16:48
» Replies: 0
» Views: 207
|
|
|
Part 272.dat |
Posted by: Michael Horvath - 2015-09-08, 16:57 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Can this part connect flush on a baseplate? I am looking at the bottom and there does not seem to be room for every stud. Compare to part 3943a.dat which does connect well on a baseplate (I think).
|
|
|
LICreator 2.0.039 |
Posted by: Jarema - 2015-09-07, 20:36 - Forum: LDraw File Processing and Conversion
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Go to https://github.com/Jeremy1980/licreator and try new release. This compilation is under Python v2.7.8 and newest PyOpenGL libraries.
Changes related to previous 2.0.016 version Wrote::: Can change layout orientation for selected pages in one time
:: Can remove empty|blank pages automatically
:: Can expand only children of selected node in tree view
:: Change tool bar icon size to 18 pixels
:: Re-grouped tool bar actions
:: Lock icon use SmoothTransformation and ItemIgnoresTransformations flags now
:: Layout orientation actually remember in undo stack
:: For more look into changelog.txt
Usage of this version of build.py - windows|OSX only:
On windows use now PYTHONHOME environment variable, and probably you can build this with command line outside Eclipse.
In example put as value 'C:\Python 27' for %PYTHONHOME%.
In next download and install Microsoft Visual C++ Compiler for Python 2.7
Install Python 2.7.8 and dependencies:- setuptools-18.3.1
- pyinstaller-2.1
- PIL-1.1.7.win32-py2.7
- PyOpenGL-3.1.0.win32
- PyQt4-4.10-gpl-Py2.7-Qt4.8.4-x32
- pywin32-219.win32-py2.7
and run build.py. Any response is welcome.
I need some from this forum with more that basic knowledge about LINUX operating system who test his just run LIC.py and return result.
|
|
|
Modelling the inside of parts |
Posted by: Ronald Vallenduuk - 2015-09-07, 16:20 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Under what circumstances and to what extent should the inside of a part be modelled?
The reason I'm asking this is that I'm working on the PF Track points and their 9V counterparts have the entire inside detailed in the part; the bottom cover is a complete part and everything below it is modelled too.
Personally I don't see any use or need for these details. That bottom cover is not intended to be removed and I'd say 99% of owners never have and never will.
In comparison, for example the PF motors don't have their insides modelled; the shell components are only drawn as far as they can be seen without disassembling the part.
Are there rules or guidelines about this? My intention would be to build the track points like the PF motors; only model what you can see. This would also affect the Monorail track switch that's being discussed elsewhere.
|
|
|
LDPub3D 1.2.1 - medium motor fade test |
Posted by: David Manley - 2015-09-07, 9:59 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (9)
|
 |
I'm struggling to get LPub3D to successfully generate build instructions with a faded medium motor. I am trying to diagnose whether this is due to my install of LPub3D or a bug. If someone here (other than Trevor) would try running LPub3D 1.2.1 against the simple model reproduced below and reply here with whether or not they see a faded medium motor on the third page, I would appreciate it. When I run it, I do not get a motor (either faded or not faded) on the third page whereas Trevor does see a faded motor.
Code: 0 Untitled
0 Name: motor_test.ldr
0 Author: David Manley
0 Unofficial Model
0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom"
0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 0
1 2 -81 0 35 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3811.dat
1 0 0 -29 43 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3024.dat
0 STEP
1 71 -72 -36 16 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 58120.dat
0 STEP
1 4 -126 -29 35 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3005.dat
0 STEP
0 !LPUB INSERT MODEL
0 !LPUB INSERT PAGE
0 STEP
0
Regards,
David
|
|
|
|