| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,810
» Latest member: Almeida
» Forum threads: 6,471
» Forum posts: 53,614
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 167 online users. » 4 Member(s) | 158 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, Yandex, Gabriel Läufer, Orion Pobursky
|
|
|
| Online Part/Model Validator |
|
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2017-02-23, 16:22 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Would an web based part/model checker in the vein of DATHeader be useful to anyone?
I recently came across an old project of mine for parsing LDraw code (in PHP). It seems it would be fairly straightforward to put it on the website somewhere and add some validation code.
|
|
|
| LPub3D L3P EOL [Poll] |
|
Posted by: Trevor Sandy - 2017-02-23, 6:40 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (6)
|
 |
Greetings,
I would like to get the temperature of resistance to deprecating L3P focusing new development around POV-Ray file generation using LDView ?
L3P source is not publicly available; therefore, it is not possible to maintain or enhance going forward. On the other hand, LDView, 4.3 will provide every bit of functionality and flexibility currently available from the L3P module. So focusing my enhancements on the LDView/LPub3D integration, I believe, will be time and effort better spent.
The L3P integration code will be removed, if and after a decision is taken, at a future point in time to be determined.
Please let me know if you have any objections to this road-map direction. I will consider the poll closed and take a decision in approx 3 weeks from the date of this post.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|