Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 4,914
» Latest member: Rayden
» Forum threads: 5,939
» Forum posts: 50,412
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 457 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 450 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, Internet Archive, Yandex, Gerald Lasser
|
Latest Threads |
Advice on subpart naming
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Peter Blomberg
49 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 9
|
Help with Duplo umbrella ...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Rene Rechthaler
1 hour ago
» Replies: 9
» Views: 203
|
Parts that do not connect
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Luís Paulo Fernandes
5 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 54
|
Orientation of Duplo 1119...
Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
Last Post: Willy Tschager
Today, 10:31
» Replies: 5
» Views: 408
|
Castle - Dragon Knights
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
Today, 6:39
» Replies: 2
» Views: 7,297
|
Part Request: 6957 3x6x1 ...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
Yesterday, 23:01
» Replies: 1
» Views: 246
|
I would like a camel! :-)
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Zoltán Tibor
Yesterday, 13:31
» Replies: 12
» Views: 8,068
|
We have a problem, again
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Willy Tschager
Yesterday, 9:36
» Replies: 5
» Views: 2,316
|
paart help
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Jeff Jones
2025-04-05, 19:19
» Replies: 5
» Views: 382
|
Part Snapping missing/err...
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
2025-04-05, 17:24
» Replies: 226
» Views: 196,721
|
|
|
Precise meaning of '~' and '_' |
Posted by: Roland Melkert - 2012-07-23, 19:22 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (5)
|
 |
I find the docs somewhat unclear, could someone shine some additional light on when and why the '~' and '_' prefixes are used?
For example I used to think the ~ is 'depreciated' and/or 'moved' but looking at 4179 this seems weird because it's a complete (and valid?) part as far i can see.
I'm struggling with this while tweaking the default part bin content of LDCad, currently I exclude all parts starting with ~ and _ but I'm starting to think I might be cutting away too much.
So in short how should these prefixes be handled in means of putting them in a part bin yes/no.
|
|
|
LDraw Part Tracker plugin for DuckDuckGo search engine |
Posted by: Jim DeVona - 2012-07-17, 21:53 - Forum: All Other Programs.
- Replies (2)
|
 |
A few months ago I wrote an LDraw Part Tracker plugin for DuckDuckGo. I've just been notified that is now live!
For example, try this query: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=98263.dat (the plugin generates the box at top)
Some background: DuckDuckGo is a search engine that accepts user-contributed plugins to provide "instant answer" responses for domain-specific queries. See DuckDuckHack for an overview of the plugin architecture. A couple different kind of plugins are possible; mine is a "fathead" plugin, which responds to keywords (part numbers) read from a data source (the tracker's part list). More fathead plugin details and examples are available here. Last but not least, here is the source code for the LDraw plugin.
Please feel free to fork and improve the plugin. The DuckDuckGo team responds to pull requests and may integrate approved changes with their site. (I think they are investing more emphasis on plugins now; the DuckDuckHack overview site did not exist when I first tried writing this plugin.)
I've listed some ideas for improvements under "Limitations" in the Readme for the plugin. The two most obvious would be to support part number-lookup-by-name (right now it's name-lookup-by-number; seems like an easy swap to make) and, especially, support for the full part library, not just the unofficial parts in the tracker. That will be a little more work, since it would need to read multiple sources. However, I think it'd be worthwhile. DuckDuckGo does some clever things with the data output by the plugin, such as auto-generating tables by category.
|
|
|
LDPatternCreator - Release 1.4.0 |
Posted by: Nils Schmidt - 2012-07-17, 15:42 - Forum: Parts Author Tools
- No Replies
|
 |
Hey,
Here comes LPC 1.4.0..
Please uninstall older versions of this software before installing a new version.
Your configuration won't be deleted if you have already version greater than 1.3.1 installed on your machine.
Change log:
New features: - The spline tool has left the beta stage. Spline vertices are arranged with an equal distance (This feature needs still a bit improvement. I hope to fix it in 1.4.1).
- The spline tool was moved to the "Add Primitives.." menu.
- Colour changes: Default colour 7 (old-grey) to 71 (light-bluish-grey) and colour 6 (brown) to 70 (reddish brown) [this change will be visible in a fresh installation of this program].
Leftovers from 1.3.X:- The spline tool is translated (Thanks J.C.)
- The triangle chain tool is translated and does not crash anymore
(see full list of tickets for 1.4.0)
I included a short readme.htm in the installation directory.
Cheers & Leg Godt
Nils
|
|
|
Thoughts about flexible parts |
Posted by: Roland Melkert - 2012-07-13, 18:19 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (29)
|
 |
Hi all,
With LDCad 1.1 in the beta stage, I'm starting to gather information/ideas for flexible part support (pneumatic hoses etc) in 1.2. I'm mainly thinking about using bezier curves for editing, the generated parts them selves will probably be submodels using official library subparts were available and generated type 2..5 lines for the rest.
I myself have very little experience with LSynth and the likes so if anyone has some different suggestions/ideas?
|
|
|
Hide arrows after you use them |
Posted by: Morintari - 2012-07-12, 4:21 - Forum: Help
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Is there a way to draw an arrow in one step and hide it in later steps. Is this done using ghosting and if so how. I just don't grasp the concept of ghosting. any help is greatly appricated.
|
|
|
help editing the view mode |
Posted by: Morintari - 2012-07-11, 5:48 - Forum: Help
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Is there a way in view mode while shuttling through steps can you go to a step in your model then edit it then go back to view mode. For example I create a model using steps. Some of the steps are wrong. I then go through view mode to view my steps. Then I change my steps by going back to edit mode when the faulty step is selected in view mode. Can a user do anything like this. if not will they consider to add this feature in next release. I find myself creating a model making a mistake and having to create it over and over again hoping to make it without mistakes. Any help is greatly appricated. thanks.
|
|
|
|