Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,309
» Latest member: Krzysztof
» Forum threads: 6,175
» Forum posts: 51,770
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 259 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 254 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, Yandex
|
Latest Threads |
Eyesight on Linux
Forum: Rendering Techniques
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
1 hour ago
» Replies: 12
» Views: 8,193
|
A fresh list of "most com...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: tom alphin
6 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 109
|
Lego Town Racer 1996 - 63...
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: N. W. Perry
Today, 0:54
» Replies: 13
» Views: 1,518
|
Another common varient: 1...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Rene Rechthaler
Yesterday, 14:51
» Replies: 8
» Views: 5,291
|
Fix for slightly incorrec...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
Yesterday, 14:13
» Replies: 3
» Views: 472
|
1Lx1Lx2L brick with studs...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: SNIPE
Yesterday, 10:14
» Replies: 0
» Views: 362
|
LDraw Colors for OpenScad
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Hageta
Yesterday, 10:03
» Replies: 0
» Views: 329
|
Img4Dat integrated in LDP...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Nils Schmidt
2025-09-11, 20:04
» Replies: 6
» Views: 784
|
TXT2DAT integrated in LDP...
Forum: Parts Author Tools
Last Post: Nils Schmidt
2025-09-11, 19:47
» Replies: 4
» Views: 836
|
Here is the raw version o...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Peter Grass
2025-09-11, 4:39
» Replies: 2
» Views: 727
|
|
|
LDMakeList V2.0 |
Posted by: Tim Gould - 2013-02-07, 23:09 - Forum: All Other Programs.
- Replies (48)
|
 |
http://code.google.com/p/ldmakelist/downloads/list
Please find LDMakeList 2.0, a replacement for makelist with added features and full support for >64 character description names. This updated version of LDMakeList contains a number of new options (-? will show them) and writes parts.xml in a format compatible with LDFind (although no support for parts.xml exists).
It can be run identically to the old "makelist" simply as LDMakeList -d or LDMakeList -n
If you do not wish to write Parts.xml please use the -x switch.
Please let me know if the compiled version works on your computer.
Tim
|
|
|
[Attn All] New membership policy? Your thoughts |
Posted by: Tim Gould - 2013-02-05, 21:10 - Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
- Replies (6)
|
 |
Hi all,
Per changes to the P&P, we now need the membership procedure to be set in consultation with the community. That phrase was added for the very good reason that membership procedures should be for all to decide.
As such I would like to hear as many thoughts as possible on membership procedures.
Added later:
NB. The membership rules are important in that only members can vote for the LDraw Standards Comittee (LSC) and LDraw Steering Comittee (SteerCo).
Tim
|
|
|
Change to LDraw Policies and Procedures |
Posted by: Tim Gould - 2013-02-05, 21:07 - Forum: LDraw.org Announcements
- No Replies
|
 |
The SteerCo recently voted to change the LDraw Policies and Procedures. Changes were made to sections 4.01 and 5.01 of that document.
Previously the document tied the membership procedure to a specific technical procedure ie. it was "granted by completing the Membership application process on the LDraw.org web site". This no longer made sense as the technology has changed (there is no process on the website) and we have changed the document to allow the community to decide how to allow new members.
Tim
|
|
|
Minifig Head pattern |
Posted by: Stan Isachenko - 2013-02-05, 19:19 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (3)
|
 |
I tried to create it with LDPC, but i don't know how. I saw tutorial, but i didn't understand it.
I project to XY part i want to pattern, but when i export it back to xy it became planar.
Maybe someone has template of minifig head?
|
|
|
How to name 2-sided heads? |
Posted by: Magnus Forsberg - 2013-02-05, 17:25 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (2)
|
 |
When I uploaded my Superman head I asked this question.
Quote
I think that we should find a nomenclature for the twosided heads.
I can find five previous parts:
3626bpq0.dat "Minifig Head Mummy Face 2-Sided with 2 Eyes / 1 Eye Pattern"
3626bpq1.dat "Minifig Head Mummy Face 2-Sided with 2 Eyes / Gold Death Mask"
3626bph4.dat "Minifig Head with Gregory Goyle/Harry Potter Pattern"
3626bph5.dat "Minifig Head with Vincent Crabbe/Ron Weasley Pattern"
3626bpsc.dat "Minifig Head with SW Grey Eyebrows & Implant Pattern"
I would like to add the word "2-Sided". But where, and how should it be written? Or not?
End quote
My suggestion now, when perhaps the 64-character ban is lifted, all two-sided heads must end with ".....2-Sided Pattern".
Any comments?
|
|
|
Official "Subfiles" That are not longer used |
Posted by: Max Martin Richter - 2013-02-04, 10:20 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (11)
|
 |
Hej,
I'm still reworking the official library.
Just a few minutes ago I opened 206b.dat. As I can see, this part is no longer used in any parts. It is more or less replaced by a newer one, but the dimension is a little bit different. What should I do, with this part? Create a "moved to" or mark it as obsolete or or or...
/Max
|
|
|
[LSC Request] End of header meta command |
Posted by: Tim Gould - 2013-02-03, 22:24 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (87)
|
 |
I think it would be really nice to have a meta command to indicate the end of the official part header information (especially) but also headers in general. Just something simple like:
That way codes like LDMakeList of LDFind can know which comments are useful notes for the header (eg. in a needs work file) and which are just separators of the different part components (eg. 0 // Studs).
Of all the meta commands ever this one (hopefully) should be the easiest 
eg.
The ENDOFHEADER meta-command indicates that the header has ended, and that any software that processes the header can stop looking. It is not required.
Code: 0 Brick 1 x 4
0 Name: 3010.dat
0 Author: James Jessiman
0 !LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2003-02
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CW
0 !HISTORY 2001-10-26 [PTadmin] Official Update 2001-01
0 !HISTORY 2002-05-07 [unknown] BFC Certification
0 !HISTORY 2002-06-11 [PTadmin] Official Update 2002-03
0 !HISTORY 2002-12-12 [hafhead] New subparted version
0 !HISTORY 2003-08-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2003-02
0 !HISTORY 2007-06-06 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 // This file has been updated often
0 !ENDOFHEADER
0 // Include the sub file
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3010s01.dat
0 // Add a quad on top
4 16 -40 0 -10 40 0 -10 40 24 -10 -40 24 -10
0
|
|
|
Dumb Offical Part Question: Lines and Sharp Edges |
Posted by: Ben Supnik - 2013-02-03, 19:01 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Hi Y'all,
Sorry for a whole pile of stupid spec q's, but...
Is there a requirement for official parts that all edges of a part be 'coated' with a line or conditional line?
I read that some programs use the presence or absence of lines to determine which mesh vertices should be smoothed across triangles, but I didn't see anything in the part authoring spec about the requirement that lines be present.
Is having lines on the edges something so basic and obvious to everyone that it didn't need to be stated? :-)
Thanks!!!
Ben
|
|
|
|