Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 5,152
» Latest member: DKumar
» Forum threads: 6,079
» Forum posts: 51,229

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 561 online users.
» 3 Member(s) | 552 Guest(s)
Baidu, Bing, Facebook, Google, Twitter, Yandex, Hageta, Jeff Jones

Latest Threads
Friends 2014
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
Yesterday, 16:20
» Replies: 18
» Views: 16,460
LDCAD about Add custom p...
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Nate87
Yesterday, 8:13
» Replies: 5
» Views: 3,138
Hi-res logo primitives
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Jens Brühl
2025-07-10, 20:40
» Replies: 16
» Views: 1,014
Part 5561, Door 1 x 4 x 1...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
2025-07-10, 9:55
» Replies: 1
» Views: 227
LDConfig Update: More dis...
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Jeff Jones
2025-07-09, 20:46
» Replies: 7
» Views: 445
bizzare minifig variants
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Jeff Jones
2025-07-09, 11:11
» Replies: 0
» Views: 113
Wookiees!
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Jeff Jones
2025-07-08, 16:48
» Replies: 0
» Views: 165
Colour Request: 15 Lemon ...
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
2025-07-08, 15:58
» Replies: 9
» Views: 584
LDraw.org 2025-06 Parts U...
Forum: LDraw.org Announcements
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
2025-07-07, 15:38
» Replies: 4
» Views: 721
Updates of the Bricklink ...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Manfred Schaefer
2025-07-06, 19:28
» Replies: 6
» Views: 689

 
  8841 - Desert Racer [Technic] (6 models, unfinished)
Posted by: Ignacio Fernandez Galvan - 2013-01-26, 18:34 - Forum: Official Models - Replies (10)

Here are the models contained in the 8841 set. It's unfinished because some parts (particularly in the 8841+8700 model) are missing or unofficial. Includes flexible parts modeled with LSynth, could change that in the future.

[Image: 8841_1_Desert_Racer.png]

[Image: 8841_2_Desert_Racer_Tractor.png]

[Image: 8841_3_Desert_Racer_Chassis.png]

[Image: 8841_4_Desert_Racer_Balance.png]

[Image: 8841_5_Desert_Racer_Buggy.png]

[Image: 8841_8700_Desert_Racer_Power_Pack.png]

8841+8700 attached in reply



Attached Files
.mpd   8841-1 - Desert Racer.mpd (Size: 70.91 KB / Downloads: 5)
.mpd   8841-2 - Desert Racer - Tractor.mpd (Size: 34.74 KB / Downloads: 4)
.mpd   8841-3 - Desert Racer - Chassis.mpd (Size: 3.62 KB / Downloads: 5)
.mpd   8841-4 - Desert Racer - Balance.mpd (Size: 3.24 KB / Downloads: 4)
.mpd   8841-5 - Desert Racer - Buggy.mpd (Size: 5.99 KB / Downloads: 4)
Print this item

  Webmasters: we need a new forum platform
Posted by: Seth - 2013-01-24, 20:04 - Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion - Replies (19)

This forumis very anitquated it could use updating. May I suggest phpBB?

Print this item

  Compiling LeoCAD
Posted by: Seth - 2013-01-24, 19:59 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers - Replies (2)

Hi,

I'm trying to compile LeoCAD ong GNU/Linux but I keep getting the following error:

/usr/bin/ld: obj/linux/system.o: undefined reference to symbol 'XQueryKeymap'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'XQueryKeymap' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 so try adding it to the linker command line
/usr/lib/libX11.so.6: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

What do I do?

Print this item

  LEGO modeling software
Posted by: Jaco van der Molen - 2013-01-23, 15:10 - Forum: Off-Topic - Replies (1)

Is this the famous LEGO design software?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=TLt8Ij...jupc#t=27s
Or is this just used to create the funny animation film with the firetruck?

Print this item

  Assemblies, moving assemblies, shortcuts and ~ parts
Posted by: Philippe Hurbain - 2013-01-22, 9:31 - Forum: Parts Authoring - Replies (6)

When parts are used in assemblies (provided as such by LEGO, and impossible to separate in normal use) their description begins with ~ so they don't appear in part tree. LDraw user should use assembly shortcuts instead.

It seems that things are not completely clear, as discussions around this come up from time to time on PT. Here is my opinion about this.

  • For assemblies without moving parts, it's simple: all parts composing the assembly are ~, and an assembly shortcut is provided (several shortcuts may be needed to account for different color combinations). Example: NXT light sensor 55969 shortcut, composed of ~parts 54732, 55972, 55816, 55970, 55966.
  • For assemblies with moving parts, a shortcut should be provided for each mechanical entity. This way the LDraw user can compose its own assembly in any position. An overall assembly is provided as well, to simplify user life when default position is OK, and for bill of materials usage. Example: NXT motor has a case assembly 54715c01, and an axle hub assembly 54725c01. Case assembly 54715c01 is made of ~parts 54714, 54715, 54716, 54717 and 54732. Hub assembly 54725c01 is made of two 54725 ~parts. Complete motor assembly 53787 is made of 54715c01 + 54725c01
  • In case one of the moving assemblies is reduced to a single part (eg. axle hub of PF motors), the description of this part is not tilded, so that the user can pick it easily to create his own position combination. For example, the small linear actuator has 3 sections moving independantly:
    - the body, assembly 92693c01, composed of ~parts 92693 and 92697
    - the rotating axle, single part not tilded 92695.
    - the piston, single part not tilded 92696.
    Two complete assemblies are provided, contracted and extended (92693c02 and 92693c03)

Print this item

Thumbs Up part 76116
Posted by: Nicola - 2013-01-21, 22:56 - Forum: Part Requests - Replies (4)

i can find no similar part. is it avaiable somehow?

bad robot arm

Print this item

  Classic Town (1980's)
Posted by: Steffen - 2013-01-21, 22:48 - Forum: Official Models - Replies (3)

this topic is intended for sharing Classic Town sets

Print this item

Thumbs Up question about similar parts
Posted by: Nicola - 2013-01-21, 12:45 - Forum: Part Requests - Replies (3)

I'm drawing some of my mocs in MLcad, and i'd like to use the exact part number for each piece. But there are some parts that i cannot find but of which exists an almost identical part.
For example my moc contains part n 61252, but it doesn't exists in LDraw, so i used part 6019 instead.
Maybe the part has yet to be added to LDraw Part Library? Or is it something wanted?

It's a pity that i can't add the correct part as some sites like Rebrickable can calculate what MOC you can build with the pieces you have and this kind of things break the functionality.

Thanks Smile

Print this item

  Fabuland
Posted by: Steffen - 2013-01-20, 22:20 - Forum: Official Models - Replies (5)

post Fabuland models below this topic

Print this item

  Call for Votes: Make MPD support required
Posted by: Travis Cobbs - 2013-01-18, 22:24 - Forum: Standards Board - Replies (6)

Please vote on the proposal below. Please modify the Subject to include your name and vote, in addition to giving your vote in the text.



Change the LDraw File Format spec:
  • Update the LDraw file format version number to 1.1.0. Note: 1.1.0 was chosen instead of 1.0.2, as this change was thought to be too big for such a minor version number change.
  • Add the following sub-section under the "Basic parsing / file content" sub-section of the "LDraw Files" section:
    Quote:Multi-Part Dat (MPD)
    Any LDraw file, no matter its file extension, may be a Multi-Part Dat file (file with other files wrapped inside). This is done using the MPD Language Extension.
  • Change the "MPD Statements" sub-section of the "META Commands" section to be as follows:
    Quote:Support for the MPD Language Extension is required.

Also, update the File Format Restrictions for the Official Library spec. Add the following new paragraph to the "META Commands" section directly above its last paragraph (the one starting with "Legacy parts"):
Quote:To reiterate: No other meta-commands (including the MPD meta-command) are allowed in official parts.

Print this item