Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 5,310
» Latest member: artur
» Forum threads: 6,175
» Forum posts: 51,775

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 299 online users.
» 1 Member(s) | 294 Guest(s)
Applebot, Bing, Google, Yandex, Orion Pobursky

Latest Threads
A fresh list of "most com...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: tom alphin
1 hour ago
» Replies: 4
» Views: 224
Lego Town Racer 1996 - 63...
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
3 hours ago
» Replies: 14
» Views: 1,637
Eyesight on Linux
Forum: Rendering Techniques
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
8 hours ago
» Replies: 12
» Views: 8,313
Another common varient: 1...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Rene Rechthaler
2025-09-12, 14:51
» Replies: 8
» Views: 5,365
Fix for slightly incorrec...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
2025-09-12, 14:13
» Replies: 3
» Views: 538
1Lx1Lx2L brick with studs...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: SNIPE
2025-09-12, 10:14
» Replies: 0
» Views: 443
LDraw Colors for OpenScad
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Hageta
2025-09-12, 10:03
» Replies: 0
» Views: 404
Img4Dat integrated in LDP...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Nils Schmidt
2025-09-11, 20:04
» Replies: 6
» Views: 846
TXT2DAT integrated in LDP...
Forum: Parts Author Tools
Last Post: Nils Schmidt
2025-09-11, 19:47
» Replies: 4
» Views: 920
Here is the raw version o...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Peter Grass
2025-09-11, 4:39
» Replies: 2
» Views: 784

 
Thumbs Up parts 3713 and 6590 Technic Bush with Two Flanges
Posted by: Nicola - 2013-04-12, 12:51 - Forum: Part Requests - Replies (3)

Hi, many latest sets contains the techic "standard" bush as part 6590, but it doesn't appear on the ldraw library. The library contains part 3713 that looks identical to me. Maybe they could be aliased somehow ?

Peeron says to use 3713 for 6590.

Print this item

Thumbs Up existing part request
Posted by: Istvan Barada - 2013-04-11, 8:59 - Forum: Part Requests - Replies (5)

Hello!

There is a technic part 87408 and 87408s01 I copy to the parts folder and start Mlcad, make a scan parts, is says "new parts found! Write new Parts.lst file?" I click yes and if I try to select the part it says "File s\87408s01.dat not found! Continue loading?"
I click yes but the parts isn't there.
Please help me.

Regards,
Cyclotron102

Print this item

  HELP!!!READ ME!ABOUT SUB PART
Posted by: k1n9 - 2013-04-10, 15:04 - Forum: Help - Replies (4)

Hi guys,
I'm new to LDraw and recently I created my own parts in LDraw.
I would like to reuse the small part created in another larger part but I cannot use the small part as a sub-part, should I upload the sub-part to library or just put it in the p file(but seems like it cannot be recognized if I only put the sub-part in p file)?

Do you know what I mean? What should I do, any helps please?

Print this item

  New Theme colors
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2013-04-10, 5:26 - Forum: LDraw.org Announcements - Replies (5)

We've shifted our theme colors to better match the main LDraw.org website (and I thought the grey was a bit drab). Any feedback would be appreciated.

Print this item

  Regarding rendering of parts
Posted by: Athanasios Gaitatzes - 2013-04-08, 13:39 - Forum: Parts Authoring - Replies (17)

I am trying to write a renderer and so trying to understand the document http://www.ldraw.org/article/415.html.
My first question is does a reverse matrix (determinant < 0) perform a mirroring on the part as I have seen in some places or just changes the winding as the document suggests. I wish the pseudocode at the bottom of the document also included the negative determinant part of the drawing process.

Also regarding rendering. If I open the subpart box5.dat in ldview the backfacing polygons are not rendered. But If I create a file sample.dat and in it I put the line "1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 box5.dat" and open sample.dat in ldview then the backfacing polygons are rendered. From reading the above document I do not understand why that is the case.

Thank you for any help.

Print this item

  Rebrickable's Parts Images
Posted by: Nathan Thom - 2013-04-07, 22:33 - Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion - Replies (10)

Hi all,

For those that don't know me, I am the creator of Rebrickable. I make heavy use of your LDraw library of parts for the images on my site which are rendered via L3P/POV-Ray.

I thought you might be interested to know that I've now made all the images available for easy download from the site http://rebrickable.com/downloads

Cheers,
- Nathan

Print this item

  LSynth and nontechnic threads x1681
Posted by: Nicola - 2013-04-06, 14:12 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers - Replies (2)

Hello, i'd like to draw a model that has x1681 non-technic threads in it.
I've understood that i have to use LSynth to design it, but from the tutorial it doesn't seem it handle that particular thread type. Can anyone confirm this before i adventure into learning to use it? Smile

Thanks Smile

Print this item

  Both 3626b and 3626c patterned heads?
Posted by: Magnus Forsberg - 2013-04-06, 10:25 - Forum: Parts Authoring - Replies (3)

This year there seems to be many "old" patterns printed on the new head, 3626c, and perhaps we need to decide how to treat them.
Must there be both a 3626b and a 3626c version of every re-released pattern?

Should all b-heads be renamed to "...with Blocked Stud"?
Should all c-heads be named "...with Hollow Stud"?
I don't think that's necessary.
The "c" in the partnumber, 3626cpXX.dat, tells me that it is a new head, with hollow stud.

Howard Lande has made a number of new heads, both as b- and c-heads.
3626bpb122, 3263bpb322, 3626bpb366, 3626bpb411, 3626bpb471, 3626bpb633, 3626bpb719
3626cpb122, 3263cpb322, 3626cpb366, 3626cpb411, 3626cpb471, 3626cpb633, 3626cpb719
(btw, they all need renumbering too)

Is that really necessary?

Print this item

  LDView64 and rendering submodels
Posted by: Matija Puzar - 2013-04-01, 19:59 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers - Replies (6)

Is it only me or...? At first I thought LDView was making an April joke, which was almost a bit funny too. The thing is, if you have more than one copy of a submodel, LDView will render all of them a bit smaller. And - the more you have, the smaller all of them get! Smile

I tried this with the 64bit versions of 4.2 Beta 1 (downloaded from SF) and 4.1.1.25 that I had previously compiled for 64bit. The 32bit version of 4.1.1.25 does not show this behaviour.

Steps to reproduce - make a model with one simple submodel (a 1x1 brick is enough), copy the submodel 4 times or so into the main model, and see what happens. Then double the amount of the submodels and press F5 in LDView.
Or download the model attached to this message.



Attached Files
.mpd   LDView_test.mpd (Size: 4.05 KB / Downloads: 0)
Print this item

  [April Fools] LEGO shares prototype parts for 2014
Posted by: Willy Tschager - 2013-04-01, 5:53 - Forum: LDraw.org Announcements - Replies (7)

Following the tradition of TLG sharing information regarding the brick shapes we've got a new batch of what we use to call L(EGO)Draw parts.

http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=14755

This time they were not provided through the LEGO Universe channel (as you can surely imagine ;-) but directly by the LDD team itself. Also the formula has slightly changed: To shorten the time between the release of a part and when it has been finally certified through the LDraw Parts Tracker for the first time TLG provided data of prototypes. Those will be available in sets only in 2014. This leaves us with plenty of time to make them fit for an official LDraw parts update.

Though we will get only parts which have already been copyrighted we are still talking about highly sensible data. Only part authors and reviewers who have signed a NDA - non-disclosure agreement will get access to the L(EGO)Draw prototypes. Chris has set up a some sort of parallel PT and you will need a second account/password. The parts will then be held in queue until they actually hit the market. If you're interested to join the team just leave a short reply to this message.

However we've got permission to share a small sample with the community to get you an idea what's all about:

[Image: L%28EGO%29Draw_prototypes.jpg]

As usual I have uploaded the corresponding .dat files to my webspace. Just add the part number to the follwing path with one example provided:

http://www.holly-wood.it/tmp/LEGODraw/Pr.../10652.dat

Please use the following guideline for the ownership:

0 PartDescription
0 Name: Filename.dat
0 Author: RealName [UserName]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
...
0 !HISTORY 2013-04-01 {LEGO Digital Designer} Original part shape
0 !HISTORY YYYY-MM-DD [UserName] File preparation for NDA LDraw Parts Tracker

Willy Tschager
on behalf of the LDraw Steering Committee

Print this item