Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 5,623
» Latest member: MeridithHe
» Forum threads: 6,380
» Forum posts: 52,971

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 199 online users.
» 2 Member(s) | 193 Guest(s)
Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, Gerald Lasser, Rene Rechthaler

Latest Threads
Discussion - proposal to ...
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Roland Melkert
57 minutes ago
» Replies: 23
» Views: 1,961
LEGO Parts Guide - Only 4...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
6 hours ago
» Replies: 30
» Views: 3,082
A fresh list of "most com...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
7 hours ago
» Replies: 12
» Views: 6,954
77255 Lightning McQueen p...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Peter Grass
Today, 0:53
» Replies: 3
» Views: 405
Help Wanted: Discord Admi...
Forum: Help Wanted
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
Yesterday, 23:10
» Replies: 0
» Views: 72
LDCad 1.7 Beta 2 (win+lin...
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Roland Melkert
Yesterday, 20:39
» Replies: 24
» Views: 2,059
Complex Figures (Duplo/Te...
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
2026-02-01, 19:47
» Replies: 5
» Views: 242
6x8x2 "helicopter" Windsc...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Rene Rechthaler
2026-01-31, 18:08
» Replies: 1
» Views: 153
LDraw.org 2026-01 Parts U...
Forum: LDraw.org Announcements
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
2026-01-30, 15:05
» Replies: 2
» Views: 460
A Friends's little help t...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2026-01-30, 14:32
» Replies: 2
» Views: 424

 
  Rail question
Posted by: Michael Horvath - 2014-01-01, 22:47 - Forum: MOCs (My Own Creations) - Replies (20)

I'm not familiar with the train and rail parts.

What is a good distance to separate two parallel rail lines from each other? Taking into account curved rail sections and the general way rail parts are supposed to be connected.

Currently I have them set as close as possible next to each other. I chose this value because part 949ac02.dat splits into two lines spaced this much from each other. But looking at Lego.com's TRAIN TRACK PLANNER it seems this can vary.

[Image: th_rail_sections_shapes_01_zpsd3fa3594.png]

Print this item

  color matching for pattern
Posted by: Michael Heidemann - 2014-01-01, 20:48 - Forum: Parts Author Tools - Replies (14)

Sometimes I am also looking for new possibilities for creating pattern.

One of the challenges I am faced is to reduce the colours used in that pattern. This is mainly necessary because most (if not all) pictures are antialiased and therefore we do not have sharp edges that we can work with, if we try to automatic the generation of pattern in ldraw file format.

I tried it so far with an algorithm from bitsticker project:

Code:
''' Identify the most similar color in the palette to a specified color based
    ''' on Cartesian distance between RGB colorspace points. Derived from libgd's
    ''' gdImageColorClosestAlpha function (in gd.c).
    ''' Code taken from project "bitsticker" at [url=http://anoved.net/files/bitsticker/bitsticker.txt]http://anoved.net/files/bitsticker/bitsticker.txt[/url])
But the result is not what I was looking for, as you may get strange matches if you only work with this algorithm.

I remembered that Tim some time ago argued that the colors are not recognised by the eye in the same way (blue different than red etc.). So I searched on the internet for calculation of color differences.

I found a source for many color related stuff at:
http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html...eCalc.html

Sadly I did not get yet a key idea from that information. But I could read that the algorithm I used so far is known to be not good.

Maybe some can read and understand that, so he can tell me how to calculate the color differences better. This should lead to a better color matching in automatically created pattern.

I think this is a good task for 2014 Smile

Print this item

  happy 2014!
Posted by: Santeri Piippo - 2013-12-31, 22:29 - Forum: Off-Topic - Replies (8)

I wish you guys a happy and playful new year 2014! May LDraw keep going strong.

Print this item

  Yafaray?
Posted by: Michael Horvath - 2013-12-30, 21:32 - Forum: Rendering Techniques - Replies (5)

Has anyone used Yafaray to render models? Supposedly it is faster than POV-Ray at rendering complex images with a lot of features.

Does Yafray have a scene description language like POV-Ray? Can it be run standalone without Blender? Or is Blender also required?


Mike

Print this item

  part 2560 widening
Posted by: Matt `da Wolf - 2013-12-30, 2:14 - Forum: Part Requests - No Replies

http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=2560

Can someone modify this so it's three lengths, 48 studs wide, while duplicating the bottom holes threefold?
Also a variant where it is 32 studs wide?
Thanks.

Print this item

  Certifiable but currently unneeded primitives
Posted by: Jude Parrill - 2013-12-29, 5:07 - Forum: Parts Authoring - Replies (4)

Recently I've noticed that Chris has begun to hold certifiable but currently unneeded primitives (for example this one). To me, this seems like a bad idea.

According to our reference, we define a held part as:

Reference Page Wrote:Hold (No) - It's getting there, but not yet.
There are errors to be corrected before the part can be released. The author has to take care of the errors.

These parts clearly do no fall under this category. Now, I understand the sentiment of wanting to sort these parts so you don't have to look over them again and again, only to realize you don't need to deal with them/certify them now. However, by putting them on hold, your only shifting this nuisance to part authors/fixers. Imagine the part author who checks his submitted parts list to see he has a held part, but when he goes to see what's wrong and fix it, finds there is, in fact, nothing wrong with it. Furthermore, imagine someone who likes to fix up parts perusing the held parts list looking for a part to fix up, constantly clicking on parts that don't need to be fixed. It'll be both annoying and off-putting to them as well.

Therefore, I'd like to suggest creating a new category for parts like this (beyond our current "certified", "needs admin review", "needs more votes", "has uncertified subfiles", and "held" categories). You could call them "Certified but unneeded" (or something along those lines) and give it a seperate color (may I suggest blue?). This way, the parts are seperated out so both you and others can skip over them instead of having them always being in the way, and they won't be a nuisance for anybody any more.

Print this item

  Datsville
Posted by: Michael Horvath - 2013-12-29, 4:02 - Forum: MOCs (My Own Creations) - Replies (54)

Download it here:

https://sourceforge.net/projects/datsville/

https://github.com/mjhorvath/Datsville

Most changes since the previous release are "under the hood". I made the file headers uniform and filled in missing information. I de-inlined a number of sub-models. I made sure only parts used the DAT extension. There should be no change in outward appearance, so the previous town map still is accurate.

[edit]

Here's the project's Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/188200221436/

Print this item

  Molded "LEGO" on brick knobs
Posted by: Adam Badura - 2013-12-29, 2:32 - Forum: Parts Authoring - Replies (10)

Many LEGO pieces have "LEGO" molded on every knob. (I think it is with every solid knob which seems to affect "System" pieces as opposed to "Technic" pieces.) In fact they happen to have other things molded as well but those are usually hidden and very across the same type of piece.

But it seems to me that LDraw somehow doesn't include that. Or at least not as "first class citizen". MLCad doesn't show such molds at all. LDView does.

So how is that stored? Judging by how LDView shows it it is not part of the 3D object but rather a "texture" (that would also explain why MLCad doesn't show it).

Why is it so? Would that be too complex to model that as well? Or is it just for historical reasons?

I surly do see potential opportunities. General building guidelines forbid some constructions as they stress the pieces too much. Among them are such that are allowed with pieces without molded "LEGO" and disallowed with others. Having the "LEGO" in 3D model would allow automatic recognition of touching edges (and thus unadvised build).



An another question associated with this topic. It seems that LEGO instructions always are written so, that the molded "LEGO" is normalized in specified directions. So that includes favoring certain pieces rotations over other mathematically equivalent.

Are LDraw pieces normalized in any way that would allow to predict orientation of the molded "LEGO" in applications that show it? (It is even more important if build editors - like MLCad - don't show it so it is not visible immediately.) Are there any programs capable of checking for such inconsistency in models or even correct them?

Print this item

  Problems with loading LDR file from LDD
Posted by: Piotr - 2013-12-28, 13:57 - Forum: Parts Authoring - Replies (9)

Hi,

This is a rookie question :-)

I have created a simple model in LDD 4.3.8. The model base on EV3 set (31313). Because I don't like the format of building instructions from LDD, I wanted to try LDView and LPub. So I have done an export from LDD to LDR file.

I have installed LDraw_AIOI_2013-01_setup_32bit_v1.exe , plus the latest complete.zip and ldrawunf.zip . I run LDMakeList.exe as well.

When I try to open exported LDR (attached to this thread) in LdView, I get below errors:

Quote:Error loading submodel x933c01.dat.
File: C:\Lego\Tata\Smietnik\auto01.ldr
Line #74
Line: 1 47 79.982009887695312 -170.532470703125 -10.602602958679199 0 0 1 0 -1 0 1 0 0 x933c01.dat
Error loading submodel 59158.dat.
File: C:\Lego\Tata\Smietnik\auto01.ldr
Line #3
Line: 1 4 80 -30.000028610229492 -39.999992370605469 -1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 59158.dat

Is there a way how can I fix it quickly and easily? :-)

Best regards



Attached Files
.ldr   auto01.ldr (Size: 9.52 KB / Downloads: 0)
Print this item

  [Sticky] Requests for help for solving problems of parts on the parts tracker - not only for part authors! part owners,
Posted by: Steffen - 2013-12-27, 18:37 - Forum: Parts Authoring - Replies (12)

This thread is intended to collect queries for help needed by parts authors on the parts tracker.

People owning certain parts, please check this thread from time to time to see if you can help us!

We need your help to be able to solve some of the problems of files on the parts tracker.

For example, a scan or photo of some real life part might be required.

Print this item