| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,482
» Latest member: J. Eason
» Forum threads: 6,281
» Forum posts: 52,433
Full Statistics
|
| Latest Threads |
Request: Mark part as obs...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
38 minutes ago
» Replies: 3
» Views: 47
|
Existing Part Edit Reques...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: SNIPE
47 minutes ago
» Replies: 149
» Views: 371,664
|
LDConfig with Bricklink S...
Forum: LDraw File Processing and Conversion
Last Post: Hageta
Yesterday, 10:13
» Replies: 0
» Views: 84
|
Certain parts are returni...
Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
Yesterday, 2:41
» Replies: 1
» Views: 223
|
LDraw.org 2025-11 Parts U...
Forum: LDraw.org Announcements
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
Yesterday, 2:40
» Replies: 2
» Views: 210
|
LDraw.org 2025-10 Parts U...
Forum: LDraw.org Announcements
Last Post: Sylvain Sauvage
2025-12-01, 18:46
» Replies: 4
» Views: 1,061
|
40775 - Mini Knight's Cas...
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Magnus Forsberg
2025-11-30, 14:40
» Replies: 0
» Views: 336
|
LEGO Icons 2025
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: N. W. Perry
2025-11-30, 13:34
» Replies: 3
» Views: 4,237
|
Here are the new raw part...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
2025-11-28, 22:09
» Replies: 2
» Views: 258
|
Part request 68502 please
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Peter Grass
2025-11-27, 15:52
» Replies: 2
» Views: 253
|
|
|
| Looking for Experienced LDraw Part Author (Paid Work) |
|
Posted by: Ansgar Riedel - 2025-11-13, 10:35 - Forum: Help
- Replies (12)
|
 |
Hello everyone,
we are currently working on a project that requires a number of custom LDraw parts. To keep everything compatible with the official LDraw standards, we are looking for an experienced LDraw Part Author who can create high-quality, highly optimized .dat files.
This is paid work, and we are looking for someone with the following experience:
Requirements
- Strong experience with LDraw part authoring
- Ability to create primitive-based, clean, and efficient geometry (minimal triangles, correct use of subfiles, primitives, condlines, BFC, etc.)
- Familiarity with the LDraw Part Authoring Guidelines
- Ability to work with custom elements, modified versions of existing parts, or completely new parts based on STEP/OBJ files
- Experience with LDPartEditor and LDraw primitives is important
What we provide
- STEP/OBJ reference files
- Technical drawings or measurements if needed
- Clear specifications for each part
- Potential for ongoing paid collaboration
What we expect
- Clean, optimized .dat files
- Correct BFC usage
- Correct origin and grid alignment
- Use of LDraw primitives whenever possible
Volume of work
We need several custom parts and are looking for a reliable long-term collaboration.
How to apply
If you are interested, please reply here or send me a private message. 
Thank you!
Ansgar
|
|
|
| LPub3D re-render everything for a change |
|
Posted by: mihao - 2025-11-12, 4:09 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hi,
I am using LPub3D to generate instructions for my MOC, and I am using the current version 2.4.9 r36.
One issue I am facing is that, whenever I modify a page, such as inserting some plain text, LPub3D will immediately re-render everything from the very first page. I don't remember this behavior in previous versions.
Is there a setting that I can turn this off? or this can be a bug.
Moreover, I can no longer enter a number to jump to that page.
Thanks
Michael
|
|
|
| patterned parts |
|
Posted by: Peter Blomberg - 2025-11-09, 18:37 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Are patterned parts allowed to deviate from the mesh of the unpatterned version?
It seems different authors have chosen different solutions. Some authors prefer using 5 decimals to make sure that the patterned part doesn't introduce new cond lines. Other authors find it perfectly acceptable to deviate from the unpatterned mesh and ignore the need for new cond lines.
Is there any consensus?
Are both approaches acceptable?
Is either approach preferable?
Why shouldn't the deviating mesh also require new cond lines?
|
|
|
|