I'm working on a custom part that is basically a face with a 1x2 plate stuck on to the back of it. The face is a complex mesh with about 45k triangles (no quads). 
To be sure my studs will have the correct shading in building instructions developed in Studio, I am adding stud.dat in LDPE. However, that step seems to "corrupt" geometry in some way. After adding the stud.dat lines, the resulting part looks ok in Part Designer, but not in Studio. Many faces have disappeared and the remaining ones look distorted.  
I have confirmed that the files are identical except for the `0 Name:` line and the two lines that reference stud.dat like so: 

I need a 5-24 torus (mixed-mode), but primgen2 is denoting any fraction other than the multiples of 2 with "99".
12-48 becomes 04
11-48 becomes 99
10-48 becomes 99
9-48 becomes 99
8-48 becomes 06
7-48 becomes 99
6-48 becomes 08
5-48 becomes 99
4-48 becomes 12
3-48 becomes 16
2-48 becomes 24
Should I just accept the name proposed by primgen2 or think about rotating a smaller prim?

If rotate a prim, then which is better; 6+rotated4 or 8+inlined2 ? The benefit of the latter is that the interface to the blocking element can be tailored.

I want to make a Flashman robot. However, I am a complete beginner. I want to make it simply based on the image above, but it’s too difficult. Could someone help me?

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
   

I just pushed a major update to core front and backend packages. I tried to find any problems but I may have missed some so keep an eye out.

I know of one issue:
- The user u number table is returning a 500 error.

An issue with some really really (maybe needs another really added) old parts. Part 799 and part 800 don't fit together like they should. The peg at the bottom of part 799 is the wrong size to fit into the hole of part 800.

Hey, everyone!

I'm curious if anyone has replicated the classic 2003 Green Goblin helmet piece, as I'm in need of it for a project that I'm working on.

It would be a massive help if anyone was able to provide this piece!

Thank you all in advance!

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/cat...conly%22:0}

Hi, 

Could someone please review the attached stickers and offer any feedback for making these compliant?

I'm quite happy with the graphics I've created. The halftone shadow was tricky to do in low poly way. I made separate files for each of the three stickers. 
I decided not to make any deeper levels of subpart for the "5" although it appears on each of the three stickers, due to the complexity of it's interface with the rest of the graphics, and the fact that these stickers only appear in one set.

I'd love to get all the missing parts in this set modelled


  rendered_small.jpg (Size: 21.53 KB / Downloads: 33)

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
   

  3068s_rally5.dat (Size: 247 bytes / Downloads: 0)
  2340s_rally5.dat (Size: 279 bytes / Downloads: 0)
  l8225stk01_tile.dat (Size: 28.51 KB / Downloads: 1)
  l8225stk01_Fin_Right.dat (Size: 151.18 KB / Downloads: 1)
  l8225stk01_Fin_Left.dat (Size: 138.73 KB / Downloads: 1)

Hi all,

It seems LGEO is basically abandonned but some people are still using it (notably through Studio), so I’m posting here in case someone else has the problem and looks on these forums.  

So the problem is that, as reported in a thread on the Studio forum, the LGEO version of 30076 is rotated 90° (Z).  I checked that Studio is using the same defs as the latest LGEO lib I have and I tested with a standalone POV-Ray install and I get the same results so I can confidently say it’s not this problem.

I made a quick correction (attached; I only added two ‘rotate’ statements) and I’m sending it to the Studo devs.

Attached Files

  lg_30076.inc (Size: 13.48 KB / Downloads: 1)

Hi, 
I've found that the last digit of the transformation matrix for a flower is missing from 
40379-1 - Bear on line 340

the instruction is

Quote:1 191 -10 -16 -30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0  24866.dat

Quote:1 191 -10 -16 -30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 24866.dat

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
   

Hi, I've picked up an error in 6360-1 - Weekend Cottage in the OMR.
It won't open in most editors. Even the OMR 3d view doesn't render the minifigs. 

The version posted on the forum by Robert Paciorek here 1980's and 1990's Town and Trains  6360 - Weekend Cottage.mpd doesn't have any problems as far as i'm aware. It has a section at the beginning where the submodels are inserted, however that's completely missing from the live version. 

Quote:1 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6360 - building.ldr
1 2 50 -72 0 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 6360 - male.ldr
1 47 150 -56 -10 0.383 0 0.924 0 1 0 -0.924 0 0.383 3899.dat
1 4 110 -40 -30 0.707 0 0.707 0 1 0 -0.707 0 0.707 3070b.dat
1 46 130 -40 -10 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 6141.dat
1 46 140 -72 -30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6360 - female.ldr