Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 4,674
» Latest member: Ingemar Bengtsson
» Forum threads: 5,806
» Forum posts: 49,581

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 338 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 336 Guest(s)
Bing, Google

Latest Threads
Part Request: LEGO LION
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: 3CFigs
Yesterday, 23:59
» Replies: 2
» Views: 157
Part request Duplo Item N...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Lawford
Yesterday, 16:17
» Replies: 5
» Views: 219
Most Common Parts that re...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
2025-01-10, 20:55
» Replies: 11
» Views: 588
6278pb01 - Mario Kart Whe...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Javier Orquera
2025-01-10, 17:16
» Replies: 3
» Views: 181
Parts Request: NINJAGO ON...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: 3CFigs
2025-01-09, 22:57
» Replies: 4
» Views: 367
[LDPatternCreator] Releas...
Forum: Parts Author Tools
Last Post: Nils Schmidt
2025-01-09, 21:41
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,058
New parts from Lego Instr...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Jeff Jones
2025-01-09, 18:57
» Replies: 53
» Views: 22,915
Numbering advise for 3209...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Rene Rechthaler
2025-01-08, 17:39
» Replies: 5
» Views: 302
Town and Trains 1994
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2025-01-08, 14:38
» Replies: 4
» Views: 1,187
Parts we are Working on -...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Jens Brühl
2025-01-08, 0:43
» Replies: 145
» Views: 86,628

 
  Fabuland 1 : Playmobil 0
Posted by: Steffen - 2013-04-14, 16:31 - Forum: Off-Topic - No Replies

bwahahaha, just found this
Fabuland 1 : Playmobil 0

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=4699408

[Image: sfzdk_-_fabuland_-_50_-_armored_car_-_01.jpg]

Print this item

  Some of my mocs :)
Posted by: Nicola - 2013-04-12, 13:05 - Forum: MOCs (My Own Creations) - No Replies

Here's some of my models! They have full instructions, pictures and 3d models powered by Brigl Smile

Retro Futuristic Racing Car

[Image: fetch.php?media=0528:img1.jpg]

Suborbital Mobile Cannon

[Image: fetch.php?media=0546:img1.jpg]

Others can be found here http://www.lugato.net/models/

Print this item

Thumbs Up parts 3713 and 6590 Technic Bush with Two Flanges
Posted by: Nicola - 2013-04-12, 12:51 - Forum: Part Requests - Replies (3)

Hi, many latest sets contains the techic "standard" bush as part 6590, but it doesn't appear on the ldraw library. The library contains part 3713 that looks identical to me. Maybe they could be aliased somehow ?

Peeron says to use 3713 for 6590.

Print this item

Thumbs Up existing part request
Posted by: Istvan Barada - 2013-04-11, 8:59 - Forum: Part Requests - Replies (5)

Hello!

There is a technic part 87408 and 87408s01 I copy to the parts folder and start Mlcad, make a scan parts, is says "new parts found! Write new Parts.lst file?" I click yes and if I try to select the part it says "File s\87408s01.dat not found! Continue loading?"
I click yes but the parts isn't there.
Please help me.

Regards,
Cyclotron102

Print this item

  HELP!!!READ ME!ABOUT SUB PART
Posted by: k1n9 - 2013-04-10, 15:04 - Forum: Help - Replies (4)

Hi guys,
I'm new to LDraw and recently I created my own parts in LDraw.
I would like to reuse the small part created in another larger part but I cannot use the small part as a sub-part, should I upload the sub-part to library or just put it in the p file(but seems like it cannot be recognized if I only put the sub-part in p file)?

Do you know what I mean? What should I do, any helps please?

Print this item

  New Theme colors
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2013-04-10, 5:26 - Forum: LDraw.org Announcements - Replies (5)

We've shifted our theme colors to better match the main LDraw.org website (and I thought the grey was a bit drab). Any feedback would be appreciated.

Print this item

  Regarding rendering of parts
Posted by: Athanasios Gaitatzes - 2013-04-08, 13:39 - Forum: Parts Authoring - Replies (17)

I am trying to write a renderer and so trying to understand the document http://www.ldraw.org/article/415.html.
My first question is does a reverse matrix (determinant < 0) perform a mirroring on the part as I have seen in some places or just changes the winding as the document suggests. I wish the pseudocode at the bottom of the document also included the negative determinant part of the drawing process.

Also regarding rendering. If I open the subpart box5.dat in ldview the backfacing polygons are not rendered. But If I create a file sample.dat and in it I put the line "1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 box5.dat" and open sample.dat in ldview then the backfacing polygons are rendered. From reading the above document I do not understand why that is the case.

Thank you for any help.

Print this item

  Rebrickable's Parts Images
Posted by: Nathan Thom - 2013-04-07, 22:33 - Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion - Replies (10)

Hi all,

For those that don't know me, I am the creator of Rebrickable. I make heavy use of your LDraw library of parts for the images on my site which are rendered via L3P/POV-Ray.

I thought you might be interested to know that I've now made all the images available for easy download from the site http://rebrickable.com/downloads

Cheers,
- Nathan

Print this item

  LSynth and nontechnic threads x1681
Posted by: Nicola - 2013-04-06, 14:12 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers - Replies (2)

Hello, i'd like to draw a model that has x1681 non-technic threads in it.
I've understood that i have to use LSynth to design it, but from the tutorial it doesn't seem it handle that particular thread type. Can anyone confirm this before i adventure into learning to use it? Smile

Thanks Smile

Print this item

  Both 3626b and 3626c patterned heads?
Posted by: Magnus Forsberg - 2013-04-06, 10:25 - Forum: Parts Authoring - Replies (3)

This year there seems to be many "old" patterns printed on the new head, 3626c, and perhaps we need to decide how to treat them.
Must there be both a 3626b and a 3626c version of every re-released pattern?

Should all b-heads be renamed to "...with Blocked Stud"?
Should all c-heads be named "...with Hollow Stud"?
I don't think that's necessary.
The "c" in the partnumber, 3626cpXX.dat, tells me that it is a new head, with hollow stud.

Howard Lande has made a number of new heads, both as b- and c-heads.
3626bpb122, 3263bpb322, 3626bpb366, 3626bpb411, 3626bpb471, 3626bpb633, 3626bpb719
3626cpb122, 3263cpb322, 3626cpb366, 3626cpb411, 3626cpb471, 3626cpb633, 3626cpb719
(btw, they all need renumbering too)

Is that really necessary?

Print this item