Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,318
» Latest member: Cristian
» Forum threads: 6,180
» Forum posts: 51,803
Full Statistics
|
Latest Threads |
axleend2
Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
1 minute ago
» Replies: 3
» Views: 123
|
A fresh list of "most com...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: tom alphin
4 hours ago
» Replies: 8
» Views: 1,016
|
New parts from Lego Instr...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Javier Orquera
5 hours ago
» Replies: 83
» Views: 69,330
|
Parts request
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Peter Grass
Today, 5:58
» Replies: 2
» Views: 490
|
Transparent sticker colou...
Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
Last Post: Travis Cobbs
Today, 1:42
» Replies: 10
» Views: 846
|
The Emperor Zurg
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Julian Raymond Ruan
Yesterday, 13:07
» Replies: 0
» Views: 345
|
Batman Cowls
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Peter Grass
Yesterday, 1:13
» Replies: 1
» Views: 478
|
Fix for slightly incorrec...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Huib Versteeg
2025-09-14, 9:50
» Replies: 4
» Views: 1,126
|
Lego Town Racer 1996 - 63...
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
2025-09-13, 23:39
» Replies: 14
» Views: 2,549
|
Eyesight on Linux
Forum: Rendering Techniques
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
2025-09-13, 18:56
» Replies: 12
» Views: 9,174
|
|
|
Is creating a new LDraw primitive allowed? |
Posted by: David Manley - 2019-02-25, 10:26 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (3)
|
 |
I'm working my way through addressing issues identified in some stickers I have submitted. One of the suggestions is to use a primitive instead of some quads.
Using "Rings and Cones", I can see some primitives with a suitable radius once a scaling factor is applied. However, rather than wanting a ring, I'm looking for a partial ring. While one of the primitives (3-16ring14) I could use is already available, a second one (3-8rin21) is not. I have played with PrimGen2 to generate the second desired primitive locally.
My question is, if I'm modelling a part and need a currently unavailable primitive, am I allowed to simply define the appropriate primitive (using PrimGen2) and submit the primitive through the parts authoring process? If this isn't allowed, is there an an (official) alternative way to get a new primitive created?
I do have an alternative where I can use a different primitive and apply a scaling to it but the ring segment ends up being too "thick" compared to the actual sticker. My preference is to try to model the sticker with the ring segments having the actual measured thickness.
Regards,
David
|
|
|
LDraw All-In-One-Installer 2018-02 v1 now available |
Posted by: Willy Tschager - 2019-02-23, 15:09 - Forum: LDraw.org Announcements
- No Replies
|
 |
An updated version of the LDraw All-In-One-Installer, in short AIOI, has been released.
The AIOI supports Windows XP (Home and Pro), Windows Vista or higher (all versions). On 64-Bit Operating Systems it will install in the "Program files (x86)" folder. The Installer will NOT run on Windows 95, 98, ME, NT Ver 4, 2000, or XP below SP2.
It contains the following changes:
* Update to LDraw Parts Libary 2018-02
* Update to LPub3D 2.3.6
* Update to MPDCenter 2.5.0.0
* Update to LDFind 1.3.5.4
You can download the AIOI from:
Home > Help > Get Started > LDraw All-In-One-Installer
Willy Tschager
(LDraw.org Content Manager)
|
|
|
Inconsistancy in panels description |
Posted by: Jaco van der Molen - 2019-02-22, 11:17 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Hi all,
There seems to be an inconsistency in the description of various panels.
I have a model that has a few of this kind of panels:
60581 Panel 1x4x3 with side flanges
87544 Panel 1x2x3 with side supports with hollow studs
87552 Panel 1x2x2 reinforced with hollow studs
Is it me, or do we mean the same with "side flanges", "side supports" and "reinforced"?
IMHO we should choose either one of these 3, preferably "reinforced" I think.
Also the "with hollow studs" is missing from 60581 Panel 1x4x3.
Do we agree to rename the description or is there really a reason to have 3 descriptions for the same thing?
Jaco
|
|
|
A way of converting Stud.Io parts to ldraw |
Posted by: Warren Elsmore - 2019-02-20, 22:57 - Forum: LDraw File Processing and Conversion
- Replies (2)
|
 |
I'm not sure if anyone has tried this before - I searched but couldn't see anything - but it might be helpful!
My wife needed 18970 (2x2 plate with scallop) in an ldraw model and it's not in the official or unofficial part tracker. It is, however, in Bricklink so I thought it might be in Stud.Io... and it is. So, to make a quick and dirty conversion, I
- Opened up Stud.Io and inserted the part, then exported it as a Collada file.
- Next, a quick trip to www.meshconvert.com to export it out as .ply
- Now, I opened up the .ply in lsculpt* and selected the mesh *only*. No plates export
- I had to fiddle with the scale a little (8x, in meters worked for some reason)
Hey presto - an .ldr file which I could rename to .dat and put into my unofficial library.
Now, this almost certainly is not a good approach, and I've no idea on the licensing of Stud.Io parts designs - but it's certainly quick and it does work. Just in case anyone else needs to try it!
*Full disclosure: I used a version of lsculpt that is not generally available. I had a custom version of lsculpt written for our company which we are not intending on releasing for various reasons. But, it's based on the same underlying code so this should still work....
|
|
|
|