| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,540
» Latest member: Mickelson
» Forum threads: 6,314
» Forum posts: 52,572
Full Statistics
|
| Latest Threads |
98138pb0.dat is missing i...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Magnus Forsberg
3 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 60
|
LEGO Parts Guide - Only 6...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
3 hours ago
» Replies: 4
» Views: 156
|
How can I install on linu...
Forum: Help
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
Today, 4:48
» Replies: 1
» Views: 63
|
Castle Ninja / Robber
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Carl Rodabaugh
Today, 1:06
» Replies: 0
» Views: 60
|
help finding ldraw for el...
Forum: Help
Last Post: Brian H
Yesterday, 23:22
» Replies: 2
» Views: 100
|
Missing Opal Trans Yellow
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
Yesterday, 19:27
» Replies: 3
» Views: 230
|
LEGO Icons 2025
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
Yesterday, 9:53
» Replies: 4
» Views: 5,024
|
Minifigure, Head Brown Ey...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
Yesterday, 9:20
» Replies: 2
» Views: 151
|
Technic 1992
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2025-12-28, 19:34
» Replies: 29
» Views: 42,194
|
Part 11459p01.dat colour ...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: N. W. Perry
2025-12-27, 15:11
» Replies: 3
» Views: 250
|
|
|
| Animal Serpent Basilisk Body Segment |
|
Posted by: Willy Tschager - 2021-04-16, 11:37 - Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Who has this part? Could someone please check this geometry:
1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 43936.dat
1 15 0 22.5 -38 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3031.dat
1 15 0 14.5 -68 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3710.dat
1 15 0 -9.5 -68 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3701.dat
1 15 0 -17.5 -68 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3710.dat
1 15 0 -25.5 -68 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3710.dat
And check the pin hole?
|
|
|
| ABB Doors u8013 and u8014 |
|
Posted by: N. W. Perry - 2021-04-15, 19:09 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (7)
|
 |
It's my understanding that these two parts actually represent a single part with a two-sided design, rather than two parts with distinct designs. Should they be merged? and if so, under what number?
|
|
|
| Lego AI |
|
Posted by: Aaron Walsman - 2021-04-15, 18:56 - Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
- Replies (10)
|
 |
Hello! I am an academic researcher leading a project to teach AI agents how to assemble and disassemble Lego models. So far we have built a learning environment that exposes certain basic operations (adding/removing/moving bricks), and now we are looking for data! We have already taken a look at the OMR (amazing work!) but would like to include as many model files as we can get our hands on. I see that there are many files posted to various forums here, but we want to be good citizens, ask permission and not just scrape everything in sight. With that in mind, I have a few questions:
A. Is it OK to write a script to crawl these forums just to find what's out there?
B. Once we have a list of what's out there, can we reach out to individual authors seeking permission to use the files in a way that isn't spammy or obnoxious?
C. Anyone reading this who is excited about the prospect of Lego building AI agents and has any reproductions of official sets or MOCs (or really any .ldr or .mpd files) that they would like to share with us, please get in touch, we would love to have this data!
D. If anyone has any suggestions of other forums to check out or better yet, bulk repositories of public model files, we would love to hear about them. We have done some poking around, but I'm sure there are things we haven't found yet.
E. Are we correct in assuming that we can use the OMR model files as long as we abide by the attribution terms of the relevant creative commons license?
Details on how we will use the data:
A. We would like to be able to publicly share a bulk collection of these files with other researchers so that they can reproduce and improve upon our work. This is important, and one of the main reasons we want to be careful and get permission from the authors of files that don't already come with explicit licensing information.
B. We will abide by all existing licensing terms that come with any content we make available.
C. When we release data, we will prominently feature attribution to the original authors of all included content (unless of course an author explicitly asks us not to attribute them).
D. This is an academic science project, and we will not use the data for commercial purposes.
We are very excited about the potential of Lego + Machine Learning, any other thoughts and suggestions for data collection are of course welcome. Again I want to stress that we want to be ethical in how we gather data, and will do our best to do right by the community. We know this material represents a lot of hard work, and we want to respect that effort. Also, while our team loves Lego, we are all new to this community, so if there's a better place to post this, or if there is any way to improve how we go about this, please let us know.
Thanks!
-Aaron
|
|
|
| No part tracker notifications |
|
Posted by: Bertrand Lequy - 2021-04-15, 5:43 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (7)
|
 |
Hello,
I posted some parts since january, but it was a year+ long I didn't do it, and maybe I missed something.
Back in 2019, I recieved e-mail notifications from the part tracker when something happened on my submissions. I didn't get them now and I want to know if the notification system had change or if something goes wrong with my account. It's a bit complicated to keep track execpt for hold status.
I realize right now that I recieved any e-mail notifications from the forum too (and some of them are activated). I checked my e-mail in the user-cp and it's the good one.
Earlier this year, Orion had to reset my password because my account had a connection issue.
Thank you.
|
|
|
| Train track math? |
|
Posted by: Michael Horvath - 2021-04-13, 5:36 - Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
- No Replies
|
 |
Is there a good article somewhere that goes into the geometry of the various LEGO train systems? I.e. angles, distances, symmetry, how the tracks fit into the greater coordinate system, etc.
Thank you!
[ed]
Never mind. I found a few sites. It's too bad that long stretches of 45 degree track don't work so well. Damn you Pythagoras! I wish TLG made some special straight track just for this purpose.
|
|
|
| LDCad on Wine (for Mac)-revisited |
|
Posted by: N. W. Perry - 2021-04-13, 4:53 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (49)
|
 |
Following the original thread, I want to revisit this topic as I'm working on a how-to guide for using LDCad (and other LDraw utilities) under Wine. I would love to know what experiences some of you have had.
Here's what I have successfully running:
- OS 10.14.6 Mojave on a 2012 Intel MacBook
- Wine (stable) 4.0.3
- XQuartz 2.7.9 (required dependency)
Here's what works:
- LDCad (flawlessly)
- LDDP (good, one minor window management issue)
- DATHeader (fine, a little jaggy-looking)
- Img4Dat (usable, some wonky GUI issues)
- LD Pattern Creator (seems fine, but I really haven't tested it)
- MPDCenter (fairly good, also jaggy-looking, glitchy in general)
- LDView (nope, it doesn't render anything in the viewport)
Also, in general any polling between external programs doesn't seem to work, but maybe I just don't know how to set it up.
I did have to manually place the fonts FreeSans and FreeMono into my drive_c\windows\Fonts folder for LDCad (as previously reported).
I just did some tinkering to see if I could update anything, but to be honest any newer configuration than the one I have seems to break something. You cannot use XQuartz 2.7.11 because it results in ugly, chunky fonts, and the current XQuartz 2.8.0 just pain doesn't work at all. (I believe there is a fix in the works for 2.8.1, though.)
I tried upgrading to Wine 5.0, but it results in a minor but annoying issue with LDCad, where the app window acts like it isn't in the front after desktop switching (even though it is). Sounds trivial, but desktop switching is such a big part of my workflow that it becomes quite irritating. So I reverted to 4.0.3, the previous stable release. (Installer packages aren't out yet for Wine 6.0.)
I would very much like to know if anyone has had success with any newer configuration? Specifically, has anybody tried Catalina or Big Sur with Wine yet? Official Wine doesn't support them, but CrossOver (paid Wine) reputedly does. But then, I don't know if it has the same issues as newer versions of Wine—and if so, whether they're fixable.
|
|
|
|