Change to the Official Library Spec for Pattern Naming - Printable Version +- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org) +-- Forum: Administrative (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Standards Board (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-5.html) +--- Thread: Change to the Official Library Spec for Pattern Naming (/thread-26036.html) |
Change to the Official Library Spec for Pattern Naming - Orion Pobursky - 2022-02-13 Based on a discussion on the PT forum, I'd like to proposed the following change to the Official Library Spec. https://www.ldraw.org/article/512.html#pattern_desc (changes in bold) Quote:The description of a patterned part should in the following format: RE: Change to the Official Library Spec for Pattern Naming - Orion Pobursky - 2022-02-16 Bump for comments otherwise call for votes is incoming. RE: Change to the Official Library Spec for Pattern Naming - Travis Cobbs - 2022-02-16 (2022-02-16, 15:54)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Bump for comments otherwise call for votes is incoming. Sorry for the delay. This change sounds good to me. RE: Change to the Official Library Spec for Pattern Naming - Roland Melkert - 2022-02-16 (2022-02-16, 15:54)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Bump for comments otherwise call for votes is incoming. I no expert on part description conventions, but this sounds fine to to me. So unless others have valid objections, I would vote to adopt this. RE: Change to the Official Library Spec for Pattern Naming - Orion Pobursky - 2022-02-16 Since there are no objections, in lieu of call for votes, I'll consider this passed. |