just stumbled over this post:
https://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/1...aring_aid/
(from the new 60404: Burger Truck Set)

as someone with "normal" hearing aids this one is also very nice...
(and there are also minifig heads with the normal ones:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page...%20aid#T=A
the hearing aid could be subfiled to be used in all heads)

The LDraw.org Steering Committee is pleased to announce that the 2023 James Jessiman Memorial Award (JJMA) recipient is Massimo Maso.

Massimo started using LDraw in 2004, at first to make MOCs that he hadn't been able to do in real life, or for a virtual collection of the most interesting LEGO sets. He has always loved being able to assemble and disassemble the pieces until you get to the perfect shape and with LDraw this is even easier because you have no limits of number and color. Since 2010 he began to make and fix parts and since 2020 he has mainly dedicated himself to completing sets of the Speed Champions series with their stickers and patterned parts.

"I've always played with LEGO bricks", that's what he'd tell you if you would asked him when he started playing with LEGO bricks. His first set was the Basic Building set 577 and the one he never tires of is the 8880. In between were Fabuland, Space and City sets. The latest addition is the 42107.

More information on the JJMA can be found at: https://www.ldraw.org/article/222.html

On behalf of the LDraw Steering Committee, we thank Massimo for his contributions and look forward to working with him in the future.

Willy Tschager

42167 - Mack LR Electric Garbage Truck


Download 42167.io
missing stickers

42168 - John Deere 9700 Forage Harvester


Download 42168.io
missing stickers

Hi, I would like to ask for part 80566, used in model 76417
Thanks in advance and a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to everyone

dkd

Hi, sorry I'm new here, so I don't know how the general procedure is when requesting new parts to be created.
I stumbled on EB forum on a new Technic C-beam that makes it's first appearance in 42168. Element number is 3167 and the dark bluish grey version's LEGO ID is 6475314.
Would someone be so kind as to model this part properly? I did a mock-up when building the set in Studio, but it's not a perfect match.


And here is the finished model, including the mock-up of the new element, if someone wants to use it for the ldraw database of complete models:
42168.io

i have a request for the following pieces to be added



24190 Large Figure Torso Skeletal with Ball Joint and Gear Hips / Waist / Bottom shorturl.at/dHQY2
[attachment=10562]
24189 Large Figure Torso Skeletal Connector with 2 Ball Joint shorturl.at/dgDE5
[attachment=10561]

A friendly remind to all authors:
If you need a "u" number, ask admin to assign you one (or a block). Do not simply take the next available u number.

You may notice some incremental changes to the Ui over the next month or so. I'm trying to implement some modernizations to the front end and add some new features. The current UI framework is incompatible with some of the components I want to use necessitating some upgrades and changes.

As I am the autor of the webtool "Ldraw-Downloader-For-Studio" (https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-26497.html), one of my users asked why my tooling isn't offering part "48156p01" (https://library.ldraw.org/official/25245) - from a quick investigation with a download of the latest complete.zip of the official lib and a search in there gave me not hits for thehigh level .dat file of the part, so I would like to ask if somebody could doublecheck - maybe I am just too stupid (and the thread may be directly closed with helping comment).

Thanks in advance, Christoph!

There's a funny glitch in LDView 4.6 (not tested in other versions), that seems to be related to conditional lines. I've seen it in multiple primitives, but it's quite apparent in p\logo4.dat, for example.

Here's what it looks like in the default view:
   

If I turn on condlines it goes away:
   

But if I add control points, it comes back with a vengeance:
   

If I had to guess, it's something to do with control points not being considered in the same orientation/matrix space as the condlines they belong to, where nested subfiles are involved.