Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 304 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 297 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Facebook, Google, Yandex, David Manley
|
Latest Threads |
MPDCenter - Inventory pro...
Forum: All Other Programs.
Last Post: Manfred Schaefer
5 hours ago
» Replies: 6
» Views: 83
|
Description of parts
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Magnus Forsberg
6 hours ago
» Replies: 8
» Views: 147
|
Friends 2015
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
7 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 600
|
Part 11090 hole depth var...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
Yesterday, 11:48
» Replies: 9
» Views: 324
|
Part Requet: Windscreen 7...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Knud Ahrnell Albrechtsen
Yesterday, 3:41
» Replies: 2
» Views: 95
|
Model Team
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
Yesterday, 1:59
» Replies: 45
» Views: 60,037
|
Difference between 86644,...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Magnus Forsberg
2025-10-15, 16:38
» Replies: 1
» Views: 119
|
Hair and Skirt Request
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Will A
2025-10-15, 15:41
» Replies: 3
» Views: 107
|
Does any friend know how ...
Forum: Help
Last Post: Jack
2025-10-15, 14:21
» Replies: 4
» Views: 177
|
[LDPE] 1.8.96 Released (n...
Forum: Parts Author Tools
Last Post: Willy Tschager
2025-10-14, 4:31
» Replies: 8
» Views: 1,286
|
|
|
Third voting option? |
Posted by: Peter Blomberg - 2025-08-30, 20:33 - Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Would it be worthwhile to create a vote/mark in addition to "hold" for the purpose of highlighting imperfections that are not ground for a hold?
A reviewer could use it to mark parts that they have processed and found wanting, to prevent it from appearing on self-made todo-lists. A kind of "hide this part" from me until changes have been made to it.
I see two possible uses of such an in-between vote:
- "Hide this part - I don't want to review it."
- "Signal the author that the part could be improved, yet leaving other reviewers the possibility to certify the part without any changes."
|
|
|
Error found in assembly part 2772c01 |
Posted by: Ishai Bar - 2025-08-28, 11:38 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (1)
|
 |
I've been struggling with getting parts 2677 and 2678 to work together (and with other monorail parts) in Stud.IO for a couple of days now, and after thinking something might be wrong with them, I eventually discovered something wrong with part 2772c01 (Monorail Track Monoswitch (2772c02 / 2774)) instead. After examining this part closely in PartDesigner, I realized that the anti-studs at the bottom are actually misaligned. It turns out that part 2774 is sitting slightly too high above part 2772c02 in that assembly. This means that any monorail that includes the Monoswitch is bound to be misaligned, even if all connections along the monorail are perfect.
I can produce a corrected 2772c01, but it's probably better if someone else does it who has more experience with .dat files and can ensure that the resulting part would be perfectly aligned.
|
|
|
parts update making MLCad behave odd |
Posted by: Harald Christ - 2025-08-27, 5:10 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Hi Team!
Just updated my MLCad v3.51 with a few of the latest parts updates (from Parts Update 2025-02 onwards)
I did it the way i normally do:
download zip file
extract to folder
copy parts, s, textures, p, 48, 8 to their relevant folders
run mklist
scan parts in MLCad
This has always served me well in the past.
However this time, there are lots of vacant spots in the part selection menu on the left.
Worse still, every file i load (ldr or mpd) fails to show some of the builds.
I know they are there, because i can make partslists from the file, but i can't view, or select them.
If i select all, then delete, then UNDO, the image shows. But saving this over the old file changes nothing.
Also, if i start a new file by dragging visible parts into the editing windows then all is good, but as soon as i drag one of the NON-visible parts, and refresh view, all the parts disappear.
Same as above, they are still "there" when making a partslist, but i can no longer view or select anything.
I've found this also seems to happen if i download a complete copy of ALL of the parts.
Is it something i'm doing wrong, or am i doomed to using old parts forever? 
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
Pattern Base Part |
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2025-08-24, 3:51 - Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Here's a list of every patterned part that doesn't have a base part:
(List generated 8/23/2025)
parts/15336p01.dat Done
parts/15336p02.dat
parts/27039p01.dat Done
parts/39367p01.dat Done
parts/39367p02.dat
parts/47510p01.dat Done
parts/49242p01.dat Done
parts/49295p01.dat Done
parts/49295p02.dat
parts/49295p03.dat
parts/60235p01.dat Done
parts/60237p01.dat Done
parts/62575p01.dat
parts/65082p01.dat Done
parts/65497p01.dat
parts/65551p01.dat Done
parts/65552p01.dat Done
parts/65834p01.dat Done
parts/65834p02.dat
parts/67100p01-f1.dat Done
parts/67611p01.dat
parts/77127p01.dat
parts/90391p01.dat Done
parts/90391p02.dat
parts/t1094k01p01.dat
parts/t1094k02p01.dat
parts/t1094k02p02.dat
parts/t1094p01.dat
parts/t1095k01p01.dat
parts/t1095p01.dat
parts/t1096p01.dat
parts/t1097p01.dat
parts/u572p01.dat
parts/u572p02.dat
parts/u9534p01.dat
parts/u9537p01.dat
|
|
|
|