Part 1056 is listed on Rebrickable as part 1879 but 1056 is what it is called in BI so thats the number I went with.

Attached Files

  7432.dat (Size: 181.15 KB / Downloads: 2)
  7433.dat (Size: 164.9 KB / Downloads: 2)
  7432_1.dat (Size: 213.49 KB / Downloads: 2)
  7433_1.dat (Size: 261.11 KB / Downloads: 2)
  7236.dat (Size: 131.8 KB / Downloads: 2)
  79688.dat (Size: 370.92 KB / Downloads: 2)
  1056.dat (Size: 282.61 KB / Downloads: 2)

Does anyone have part 68502 lurking around in their BI parts please before I order it to scan it?

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn....2pb01&in=S

Its been in CMF and advent type sets before now and its now in the exclusive to lego employee set for this year so it should be available digitally I would have thought.

In the new Speed Champions set 77256 BTTF De Lorean, several new parts are introduced -among the already existing bracket 7674, but also two new cheese slopes (Slope Brick 31, 1 × 1 × 0.667) in widths 3 and 4. I have already created both parts (WIP), but I can only find the element numbers, not the design numbers. Can these parts already be submitted, or do I have to wait for the offical release? Has someone else created them before? Does someone knows the part number?

Just discvoerd by coincidence a gap in a offical part/sticker (https://library.ldraw.org/parts/38158). Triangle: "3 16 21.6 -.25 8.2 -7.497 -.25 11.354 -7.82 -.25 11.354" is missing. I wasn’t sure where to post it, so I used the forum.

FYI:

The are a couple of sticker parts and shortcuts that are giving 500 errors. Since I'm currently on holiday, it may be that this error goes unfixed until next weekend.

Hey, hello!

I am quite new into everything around LDRAW and I would appreciate guidance or anything here!

I am trying to convert dat to obj/stl for me to play around with the technic files.

I have tried already LDView, Stud.io, FreeCad, etc.

My idea and what I am trying is to create a script to convert all the files I want. It works.

BUT, there are a few parts like 6536 that no matter what I do won't give me the correct file. The best version I can have is the two parts separate, but the "solid" that join it together will never be in place.

I have seen quite a few topics and mentions problems like this but how to solve.

Does anyone know or have a proper way to download those STL/OBJ or whatever files (if technic specific better)

The official Sticker Box standard specify the file naming rule as "stickerback...".
Consequently all sticker backs have "Sticker Back" in their descriptions.
Is this the way it was supposed to be or should they have "Sticker Box" in the description?

Does anyone know why there are so many Mursten brick fixes on the tracker?

There are also many new Mursten parts waiting to be reviewed.

When reviewing Mursten parts, are there any specifics that the reviewer needs to know? If I understand it correctly, the windows and doors have fins that go in the Mursten end slots. Are there any measurements on the slot size or the fin size that need to be checked? What about the total window height compared to a Mursten brick height?

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/cat...conly%22:0}

I see the torso and hat are available, but no luck on the head. Anyone who could whip him up for me?
Thanks.

The parts list contains 673 parts with enough certify votes to enable admin review. However, the admin panel contains only 77 parts ready for review.

This discrepancy is explained by the fact that many CCN/CCF parts have subfiles with a hold vote or not enough certify-votes.

I would like to make it easier for a reviewer to find those subfiles that currently lack sufficient number of certify votes. Specifically so that they aren't drowned in the sea of _all_ uncertified subfiles.

Secondly, I would like part authors to become aware of any hold votes on subparts that prevent admin review of the parent part.

Thirdly, I'd like a feature that lists any such subfiles having had a hold vote for more than 3 months so that non-active parts authors' parts can be finalized by a currently active author.

Please comment which, if any, such feature would be helpful to you.