| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,666
» Latest member: yoyo5757
» Forum threads: 6,402
» Forum posts: 53,120
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 294 online users. » 3 Member(s) | 287 Guest(s) Baidu, Bing, Google, Yandex, Bor, Thom Kok
|
| Latest Threads |
Discussion - proposal to ...
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Travis Cobbs
Yesterday, 20:41
» Replies: 51
» Views: 5,000
|
[LDPE] 1.9.01 Released ('...
Forum: Parts Author Tools
Last Post: Nils Schmidt
Yesterday, 17:34
» Replies: 0
» Views: 57
|
4.5L technic axle and new...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
Yesterday, 17:11
» Replies: 4
» Views: 390
|
What to do with Stippling...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
Yesterday, 12:48
» Replies: 4
» Views: 186
|
SF90 XX tires 5810 to go ...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Peter Grass
2026-02-19, 18:28
» Replies: 1
» Views: 122
|
Technic 1992
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2026-02-19, 16:27
» Replies: 31
» Views: 46,696
|
Incomplete image of two m...
Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
Last Post: Alfred Schmitz
2026-02-19, 14:11
» Replies: 5
» Views: 292
|
Help unscaling a whole LD...
Forum: Help Wanted
Last Post: N. W. Perry
2026-02-18, 17:38
» Replies: 5
» Views: 329
|
Decorated Part: 21560 - L...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Paul Haan
2026-02-18, 14:44
» Replies: 2
» Views: 253
|
Enabling 'reactions' to p...
Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
Last Post: tom alphin
2026-02-18, 4:43
» Replies: 0
» Views: 156
|
|
|
| OMR specification and unofficial files |
|
Posted by: Philippe Hurbain - 2015-11-22, 8:32 - Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
- Replies (21)
|
 |
Following the problem mentionned here and after discussions with Mikeheide about MPDCenter, I think that OMR specifications should be updated to make it clear that unofficial parts MUST be included in OMR conform files.
It is more or less implied by this paragraph of the specification but it should be made much more explicit
Quote:Unofficial parts are allowed to be used. The filename of the unofficial part is subject to the following naming rules:
<Set Number>[-<Optional Qualifier>] - <Unofficial Part Number>.dat
Where:
<Set Number> is the the number printed on the model's container.
<Optional Qualifier> is a sequential number, starting with 1, added if there is more than one set that could be assigned <Set Number>.
<Unofficial Part Number> is the unofficial part number assigned in that very moment.
Example:
33956.dat would be renamed to 3345 - 33956.dat or 3345-1 - 33956.dat.
|
|
|
| 8464 - Front End Loader - error in model |
|
Posted by: Tim Williams - 2015-11-21, 11:38 - Forum: Official Models
- Replies (7)
|
 |
I'm new here and taking in an interest as I want to build some models then animate them in Blender.
Anyway - looking at the official models pack I opened the Front End Loader in MLCad and noticed a bug in the model - the pneumatic rams are not correctly located. MLCad gave me a warning dialog as I opened the file to say one or more parts has been upgraded to new versions so not sure if this is the cause.
What is the correct process for reporting this - I'm not yet feeling proficient to tackle fixing the model myself just yet.
Regards,
Tim.
|
|
|
| Question regarding OMR Compliance |
|
Posted by: Roland Dahl - 2015-11-16, 21:38 - Forum: Help
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Creating a File Header you can choose either “Model” or “unofficial Model” :
0 !LDRAW_ORG Model -OR- 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Model
May anybody give a definition or a link for “Model” respectively “unofficial Model” with respect to OMR Compliance?
I failed to find the answer on LDraw.
Thanks for help.
Roland
|
|
|
|