| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,422
» Latest member: Ben Craig
» Forum threads: 6,245
» Forum posts: 52,221
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 265 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 261 Guest(s) Baidu, Bing, Facebook, Google
|
| Latest Threads |
The colour of textures in...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Peter Grass
9 hours ago
» Replies: 6
» Views: 181
|
Keywords and invalid 0 li...
Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
2025-11-03, 22:17
» Replies: 6
» Views: 212
|
Minifigure Head MINI HEAD...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Bailey Meyer
2025-11-03, 20:37
» Replies: 5
» Views: 423
|
Friends 2025
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
2025-11-02, 19:24
» Replies: 1
» Views: 432
|
Technic 1990
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2025-11-02, 15:05
» Replies: 14
» Views: 18,552
|
Sorting by date
Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
Last Post: Peter Blomberg
2025-11-01, 10:22
» Replies: 5
» Views: 528
|
Parts request , spider we...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Peter Grass
2025-10-31, 11:23
» Replies: 1
» Views: 226
|
Part 4070 differences in ...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Peter Grass
2025-10-31, 10:58
» Replies: 7
» Views: 666
|
Empty file with MLCad
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
2025-10-30, 0:20
» Replies: 2
» Views: 308
|
Duplo parts not yet in LD...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Peter Grass
2025-10-29, 9:46
» Replies: 16
» Views: 2,360
|
|
|
| Merry Christmas |
|
Posted by: Max Martin Richter - 2018-12-24, 11:30 - Forum: Off-Topic
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Dear all,
I wish everybody in our community a Merry Christmas.
Best regards
Max
PS.: Thanks to Philo for creating the face pattern and 30841.dat that quick!
|
|
|
| OMR File Header |
|
Posted by: Johann Eisner - 2018-12-22, 11:45 - Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
- Replies (12)
|
 |
Hello Everyone
After reading the OMR file Specification the nineteeth time, I am a little confused:
Under File Header is this written:
File Headers
Each individual model file in the MPD that does not represent an unofficial part must have the following standard header format.
Standard Header:
Code: 0 FILE <Filename>.ldr
0 <Individual filename>
0 Name: <Filename>.ldr
0 Author: <Author Name> [Username]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Model -OR- 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Model
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
and under OMR example this:
OMR Example
Code: 0 FILE 6712 - Main.ldr
0 Main
0 Name: 6712 - Main.ldr
0 Author: Willy Tschager [Holly-Wood]
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
Now the question:
Ist the line "0 !LDRAW_ORG Model -OR- 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Model" nessacery or not?
Johann
|
|
|
| Make life a little easier for admin ... |
|
Posted by: Ulrich Röder - 2018-12-21, 16:04 - Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
- Replies (2)
|
 |
An idea .... not more:
Many necessary small changes to already submitted files, finally always lead to an email-rain to the admin ...
What would be.....,
a) with the supervision of an experienced reviewer
.... if a reviewer would have the opportunity to release an "X" button to the component of a respective author, who would then be able to use this one-time delete function.
...only for this one specified file on the tracker and thus relieve the admin.
or b)
This delete function would be generally allowed to any author ,limited to his own files.
What do you think?
|
|
|
| New Parts Tracker reviewers |
|
Posted by: Chris Dee - 2018-12-21, 15:14 - Forum: Help Wanted
- Replies (3)
|
 |
The 2018-02 Parts Update, and many of the most recent updates, have relied heavily upon a small number of reviewers, who assess the submitted parts for completeness, accuracy, compliance to the standards and demonstrate a logical approach to naming and subparting. The numbers of certify reviews by each reviewer on files released in update 2018-02 were as follows:
599 MMR1988
573 MagFors
332 Steffen
327 Philo
68 arezey
52 Holly-Wood
20 GeraldLasser
15 BlackBrick89
9 mikeheide
6 mkennedy
2 theJudeAbides
2 dulcaoin
As with part authoring, this is not a competition, but it would help to reduce the backlog if we could get more active reviewers onboard.
There is no rigid assessment process, but we do expect candiates to have demonstrated authoring skills, show an understanding and acceptance of the Official Library Standards and be able to provide constructive feedback to authors.
Please contact me or reply here if you feel you have these abilities and are able to contribute.
|
|
|
|