studx.dat shape


studx.dat shape
#1
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...studxa.dat

Since I don't have a reference part easily accessible, does this primitive need altering for the new axlehole shape?

Also, not sure about stxjcly9 naming. Maybe studxjcly9 instead?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...xjcyl9.dat
Reply
RE: studx.dat shape
#2
(2022-05-23, 3:49)Orion Pobursky Wrote: https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...studxa.dat

Since I don't have a reference part easily accessible, does this primitive need altering for the new axlehole shape?

Also, not sure about stxjcly9 naming. Maybe studxjcly9 instead?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...xjcyl9.dat

As this stud is much smaller, than an axle I don't think it's worth to rework it: Please see:

[Image: 28903.png]
Source: Bricklink: https://img.bricklink.com/ItemImage/EXTN/28903.png

/Max
Reply
RE: studx.dat shape
#3
(2022-05-23, 3:49)Orion Pobursky Wrote: https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...studxa.dat

Since I don't have a reference part easily accessible, does this primitive need altering for the new axlehole shape?

Also, not sure about stxjcly9 naming. Maybe studxjcly9 instead?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...xjcyl9.dat

There is no relationship between studxa and the axleholes.

Please keep in mind that any primitive beginning with "stud..." also need a lo-res version, and a Move to 8-folder, just to avoid bad behaviour in MLCad.
Reply
RE: studx.dat shape
#4
(2022-05-23, 19:32)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: There is no relationship between studxa and the axleholes.

Got it. Thanks.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)