+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html)
+--- Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: studx.dat shape (/thread-26390.html)
studx.dat shape - Orion Pobursky - 2022-05-23
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=p/studxa.dat
Since I don't have a reference part easily accessible, does this primitive need altering for the new axlehole shape?
Also, not sure about stxjcly9 naming. Maybe studxjcly9 instead?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=p/stxjcyl9.dat
RE: studx.dat shape - Max Martin Richter - 2022-05-23
(2022-05-23, 3:49)Orion Pobursky Wrote: https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=p/studxa.dat
Since I don't have a reference part easily accessible, does this primitive need altering for the new axlehole shape?
Also, not sure about stxjcly9 naming. Maybe studxjcly9 instead?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=p/stxjcyl9.dat
As this stud is much smaller, than an axle I don't think it's worth to rework it: Please see:
![[Image: 28903.png]](https://img.bricklink.com/ItemImage/EXTN/28903.png)
Source: Bricklink: https://img.bricklink.com/ItemImage/EXTN/28903.png
/Max
RE: studx.dat shape - Magnus Forsberg - 2022-05-23
(2022-05-23, 3:49)Orion Pobursky Wrote: https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=p/studxa.dat
Since I don't have a reference part easily accessible, does this primitive need altering for the new axlehole shape?
Also, not sure about stxjcly9 naming. Maybe studxjcly9 instead?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=p/stxjcyl9.dat
There is no relationship between studxa and the axleholes.
Please keep in mind that any primitive beginning with "stud..." also need a lo-res version, and a Move to 8-folder, just to avoid bad behaviour in MLCad.
RE: studx.dat shape - Orion Pobursky - 2022-05-23
(2022-05-23, 19:32)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: There is no relationship between studxa and the axleholes.
Got it. Thanks.