studx.dat shape

[Orion Pobursky]

https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...studxa.dat

Since I don't have a reference part easily accessible, does this primitive need altering for the new axlehole shape?

Also, not sure about stxjcly9 naming. Maybe studxjcly9 instead?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...xjcyl9.dat

[Max Martin Richter]

https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...studxa.dat

Since I don't have a reference part easily accessible, does this primitive need altering for the new axlehole shape?

Also, not sure about stxjcly9 naming. Maybe studxjcly9 instead?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...xjcyl9.dat

As this stud is much smaller, than an axle I don't think it's worth to rework it: Please see:


Source: Bricklink: https://img.bricklink.com/ItemImage/EXTN/28903.png

/Max

[Magnus Forsberg]

https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...studxa.dat

Since I don't have a reference part easily accessible, does this primitive need altering for the new axlehole shape?

Also, not sure about stxjcly9 naming. Maybe studxjcly9 instead?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...xjcyl9.dat

There is no relationship between studxa and the axleholes.

Please keep in mind that any primitive beginning with "stud..." also need a lo-res version, and a Move to 8-folder, just to avoid bad behaviour in MLCad.

[Orion Pobursky]

There is no relationship between studxa and the axleholes.

Got it. Thanks.