Missing Ldraw Colors

[Willy Tschager]

We translated Lilac with Purple. See Bright Reddish Lilac, Medium Lilac, therefore this should become Medium Purple. As for the edge the usual #333333 should be appropriate.

w.

BTW, you should also add the original LEGO color name to your chart to ease future identification, see http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html

[Magnus Forsberg]

As for the edge the usual #333333 should be appropriate.

Please create new edge colours for the alternative file too, ldcfgalt.ldr

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Seashell, L. 14mm


My own Data
Lego ID: 234 
Lego Name: TR. FIRE YELL.
MY guessed name: Transparent Fire Yellow

http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html
No match found

http://wiki.ldraw.org/index.php?title=Us...ison_Chart
Lego ID: na
Ldraw Name: na
Lego Name: Tr. Fire. Yellow
RGB: #F1E5AF

http://www.peeron.com/inv/colors
No match found

http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=868566
Lego ID: 234
Lego Name: Transparent Fire Yellow

http://rebrickable.com/colors
No match found

http://swooshable.com/parts/colors
Lego ID: 234
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: na
Lego name: Transparent Fire Yellow
RGB: #FBE890


This is a hard guy. Only a few information available. And two opinions on the RGB color. The good thing is, that the 234 is free as ldraw id. 

[Willy Tschager]

As for the edge the usual #333333 should be appropriate.

Please create new edge colours for the alternative file too, ldcfgalt.ldr

I would love if you could help me out on this since I do not have any intention to get creative.

w.

[Willy Tschager]

I'm fine with the name. As for the RGB I'd go with swooshable. Measuring the color in PS I get values close to [size=large]#FBE890[/size] (since it is a transparent part it is hard to figure out what is the gray background and what is overlay). As for the edge use #baab6a

w.

[Philippe Hurbain]

While we are working on LDConfig.ldr, I'd like to see RGB value of main color (16) to be changed to something more "visible" than current gray, which is very easy to confuse with Light Gray or LBG. See this discussion for more details... I suggest to use #ffff80, a color I use for years as default color for LDView.

Other opinions/suggestions?

[Max Martin Richter]

While we are working on LDConfig.ldr, I'd like to see RGB value of main color (16) to be changed to something more "visible" than current gray, which is very easy to confuse with Light Gray or LBG. See this discussion for more details... I suggest to use #ffff80, a color I use for years as default color for LDView.

Other opinions/suggestions?

This means, that I need to change my background from white to another colour too. :-)

[Philippe Hurbain]

This means, that I need to change my background from white to another colour too. :-)

Not forced. I use white background. I agree that the text preview here seems overexposed, but with shading it works really well (at least in LDView).

[Willy Tschager]

While we are working on LDConfig.ldr, I'd like to see RGB value of main color (16) to be changed to something more "visible" than current gray, which is very easy to confuse with Light Gray or LBG. See this discussion for more details... I suggest to use #ffff80, a color I use for years as default color for LDView.

Other opinions/suggestions?

It's close to Bright_Light_Yellow but I think being similar to Light_Gray is much worse. I'm fine with it.

w.

[Philippe Hurbain]

It's close to Bright_Light_Yellow but I think being similar to Light_Gray is much worse. I'm fine with it.

It's indeed difficult to choose a color not close of an existing one in LEGO palette - just need to find one not as ubiquitous as LG/LBG!

We shouldn't be too fast to change this color, it seems to trigger issues with some software - albeit not major ones:
- LDPE does show the modified color in the color bar, but a part in main color remain gray
- In LDCad, unused space in color wheel takes the color of main color and becomes yellow.

[Magnus Forsberg]

How about LDView and DatHeader/LDFind/LDStructure?
I can't make them show that yellow colour.

Preview icons in Windows are still created grey by LDView.

Or do I still have issues from having software in the wrong folder?
I have a copy of ldconfig.ldr in the VirtualStore-folder downloaded by DatHeader

[Philippe Hurbain]

How about LDView and DatHeader/LDFind/LDStructure?
I can't make them show that yellow colour.

LDView (and Mike's tools that use LDView DLL) use "default color" defined in LDView preference instead of LDConfig color 16.

Preview icons in Windows are still created grey by LDView.

This depends on LDView "thumbnails" preference set.

[Willy Tschager]

I'm fine with the name. As for the RGB I'd go with swooshable. Measuring the color in PS I get values close to [size=large]#FBE890[/size] (since it is a transparent part it is hard to figure out what is the gray background and what is overlay). As for the edge use #baab6a

w.

Sven,

go ahead with this one.

w.

[Magnus Forsberg]

I would love if you could help me out on this since I do not have any intention to get creative.

I could do that if I would understand how to. I tried to recreate the edge colour from the examples above and failed.
Light colours should have darker edges, and darker colours have lighter edges. Right?

You said above "brightness is reduced by 25%". There is a big difference between "reduce by 25 percent" and "reduce by 25 percentage points"

Could you show me an online tool that could be used. I don't have Photoshop.

What do you mean by "creative"? Are you telling me there is no ruling idea behind the alternative edge colours?

[Willy Tschager]

I could do that if I would understand how to. I tried to recreate the edge colour from the examples above and failed.
Light colours should have darker edges, and darker colours have lighter edges. Right?

You said above "brightness is reduced by 25%". There is a big difference between "reduce by 25 percent" and "reduce by 25 percentage points"

Could you show me an online tool that could be used. I don't have Photoshop.

Sure:

http://www.webme.co.uk/web-tools/color-picker.php
http://onlinewebtool.com/colorpicker.php

Insert a hex and if B says for example 76 move B to 51 to get your edge color.

What do you mean by "creative"? Are you telling me there is no ruling idea behind the alternative edge colours?

Don't ask me, I haven't worked on the alternative LDConfig. My guessing is that some values have been copied form the old LDConfig, while the criteria for the rest was, well, taste. Therefore your first step should be working out some rules for you. If I remember correctly we used a brighter edge line for the LDconfig.ldr on the dark colors when B droped below 33%.

w.

[Magnus Forsberg]

Thanks, looks like good tools.  I'll get creative.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

I'm fine with the name. As for the RGB I'd go with swooshable. Measuring the color in PS I get values close to [size=large]#FBE890[/size] (since it is a transparent part it is hard to figure out what is the gray background and what is overlay). As for the edge use #baab6a

w.

Sven,

go ahead with this one.

w.

Ok here it is:

LEGO color: 234 | Transparent Fire Yellow => Ldraw: 218 | Trans_Fire_Yellow VALUE #FBE890 - EDGE #baab6a

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Next one


Icon, Hawaii Flover, L. 16-POL

My own Data
Lego ID: 295
Lego Name: FLA.PINK
MY guessed name: Flamingo Pink

http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html
No match found

http://wiki.ldraw.org/index.php?title=Us...ison_Chart
Lego ID: 295
Ldraw Name: Bright Pink
Lego Name: Flamingo Pink
RGB: na

http://www.peeron.com/inv/colors
No match found

http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=868566
Lego ID: 295
Lego Name: Flamingo Pink

http://rebrickable.com/colors
No match found

http://swooshable.com/parts/colors
Lego ID: 295
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: na
Lego name: Flamingo Pink
RGB: #FF94C2


It seems that there only exists one piece in this color. [color=#333333]Unfortunately there is no image of any part in this color by TLG . The only color information we have is from swooshable. The good thing is, that 295 is available as ldraw id. If we decide to use the swooshable color. Should we take "Bright Pink" as name?[/color]

[color=#333333]So Long[/color]

[color=#333333]SVen[/color]

[Willy Tschager]

It seems that there only exists one piece in this color. [color=#333333]Unfortunately there is no image of any part in this color by TLG . The only color information we have is from swooshable. The good thing is, that 295 is available as ldraw id. If we decide to use the swooshable color. Should we take "Bright Pink" as name?[/color]

We've already got a Bright_Pink:

// LEGOID 222 - Light Purple
!COLOUR Bright_Pink CODE 29 VALUE[color=black] #E4ADC8

According to Swoosh this is a retired color so we should stick to Flamingo Pink.

w.
[/color]
[color=white]#333333[/color]

[Willy Tschager]

It seems that there only exists one piece in this color. [color=#333333]Unfortunately there is no image of any part in this color by TLG . The only color information we have is from swooshable. The good thing is, that 295 is available as ldraw id. If we decide to use the swooshable color. Should we take "Bright Pink" as name?[/color]

We've already got a Bright_Pink:

// LEGOID 222 - Light Purple
!COLOUR Bright_Pink CODE 29 VALUE[color=black] #E4ADC8

According to Swoosh this is a retired color so we should stick to Flamingo Pink.

w.
[/color]
[color=white]#333333[/color]

Looks like a go:

LEGO color: 295 | [color=#333333][size=small]Flamingo Pink[/size] => Ldraw: 295 | [color=black]Flamingo Pink[/color] - VALUE[color=black] #FF94C2 -[/color] EDGE #333333

w.
[/color]

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Next one


Brick 2x4

My own Data
Lego ID: 219
Lego Name: LILAC
MY guessed name: Lilac

http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html
No match found

http://wiki.ldraw.org/index.php?title=Us...ison_Chart
Lego ID: 219
Ldraw Name: Violet
Lego Name: Lilac
RGB: #564E9D

http://www.peeron.com/inv/colors
No match found

http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=868566
Lego ID: 219
Lego Name: Lilac

http://rebrickable.com/colors
Lego ID: 1009
Ldraw ID: 110
Bricklink ID: 43
Lego Name: LILAC
Rebrickable Name: Violet
RGB: #4354A3

http://swooshable.com/parts/colors
Lego ID: 219
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: 73
Bricklink Name: Lilac
Lego name: Lilac
RGB: #564E9D


We might have a conflict here, because Rebrickable mentioned 110 as Ldraw ID whis is "Bright bluish violet". I also have 110 as Lego ID Bright bluish violet, so maybe 219 is something similar, but at least from TLG point of view different.


So Long

Sven

[Willy Tschager]

The main problem is that we have a total mismatch between Lilac, Pink, Violet and Purple, but it cannot be solved without breaking the links to BL. I would therefore go with BLs "Medium Violet"

w.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

The main problem is that we have a total mismatch between Lilac, Pink, Violet and Purple, but it cannot be solved without breaking the links to BL. I would therefore go with BLs "Medium Violet"

w.

May I asked why it would be a big issue to break/rework the links with BL if we could clean up stuff? 

So Long

Sven

[Willy Tschager]

The main problem is that we have a total mismatch between Lilac, Pink, Violet and Purple, but it cannot be solved without breaking the links to BL. I would therefore go with BLs "Medium Violet"

w.

May I asked why it would be a big issue to break/rework the links with BL if we could clean up stuff? 

So Long

Sven

Because many use the LDraw System of Tools to prototype and the resulting parts list as shopping list for BL. It wouldn't make much sense to clean up stuff for the sake that we know the fan created charts are wrong and we know better.

w.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Ok, got it. Then let's go with Medium  Violet. What about the colors? Shall we go with Swooshable #564E9D?

So Long

Sven

[Willy Tschager]

Ok, got it. Then let's go with Medium  Violet. What about the colors? Shall we go with Swooshable #564E9D?

So Long

Sven

Yepp, do so.

w.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Ok, got it. Then let's go with Medium  Violet. What about the colors? Shall we go with Swooshable #564E9D?

So Long

Sven

Yepp, do so.

w.

Here it is:

LEGO color: 219 | Lilac => Ldraw: 219 | [color=black]Medium[/color] Violet  VALUE[color=black] #564E9D -[/color] EDGE #333333

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Next one


Lattice Plate 1x2 "No. 1000"


My own Data
Lego ID: 336
Lego Name: SILVER INK
MY guessed name: Silver Ink

http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html
No match found

http://wiki.ldraw.org/index.php?title=Us...ison_Chart
Lego ID: na
Ldraw Name: Metallic Silver
Lego Name: Silver Ink
RGB: na

http://www.peeron.com/inv/colors
No match found

http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=868566
Lego ID: 336
Lego Name: Silver Ink

http://rebrickable.com/colors
Lego ID: 1003
Ldraw ID: 80
Bricklink ID: 67
Lego Name: SILVER INK
Rebrickable Name: Metallic Silver
RGB: #A5A9B4

http://swooshable.com/parts/colors
Lego ID: 336
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: na
Bricklink Name: na
Lego name: Silver Ink
RGB: #F7F7F7


I think this is quiet a challenge. We have a free Ldraw ID, but a mismatch with the names. Rebrickable points out "Metallic Silver (Ldraw 80)" , but this is already taken by (LEGO ID 315 "Silver Metallic").
We could create a new color or map LEGO ID 336 also to LDraw ID 80.

So Long

Sven

[Philippe Hurbain]

What I don't understand is that we have 3 different LEGO IDs (depending on source) for this color ??? (336/219/1003)

[Sven v. Beuningen]

What I don't understand is that we have 3 different LEGO IDs (depending on source) for this color ??? (336/219/1003)

As far as I know 1003 is a ID which is taken by rebrickable, because they didn't know the number. I did not get any number higher than 999 from TLG. 

336 is Silver Ink from TLG
219 is mistake from the last color. I'll just correct it.

So Long

Sven

[Willy Tschager]

According to the timeline and the photo stream at swooshable this is a chrome color and we should simply map it to 309 - Metalized Silver, LDraw 383.

w.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Next one


RING 14,7 - POLISHED

My own Data
Lego ID: 293
Lego Name: TR.L.ROYAL BLUE
MY guessed name: [color=#333333]Transparent Light Royal Blue[/color]

http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html
No match found

http://wiki.ldraw.org/index.php?title=Us...ison_Chart
No match found

http://www.peeron.com/inv/colors
No match found

http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=868566
Lego ID: 293
Lego Name: Transparent Light Royal Blue

http://rebrickable.com/colors
Lego ID: 293
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: na
Lego Name: [color=#333333][size=small]TR.L.ROYAL BLUE[/size][/color]
Rebrickable Name: Trans Light Royal Blue
RGB: #B4D4F7

http://swooshable.com/parts/colors
Lego ID: 293
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: na
Bricklink Name: na
Lego name: Transparent Light Royal Blue
RGB: #6BABE4


Here we have another transparent piece. It's a rare color and only a few information available. 293 is a free ldraw id. The Royal Blue colors are mapped to different ldraw names (Blue_violet, Light_blue), therefore we can't simply adopt the name. Because it is a "light" color we could go with "Trans_Light_Blue". At least from my point of view it would fit. For RGB values we have swooshable and rebrickable as different options.

So Long

Sven

[Willy Tschager]

According to our nomenclatura for "Royal" this becomes:
Trans_Light_Blue_Violet
The darker swooshable RGB is closer to the photostream but it's up to you.
w.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

According to our nomenclatura for "Royal" this becomes:
Trans_Light_Blue_Violet
The darker swooshable RGB is closer to the photostream but it's up to you.
w.

Ok, then I would suggest to do it this way:

LEGO color: 293 | [color=#333333]Transparent Light Royal Blue => Ldraw: 293 | Trans_Light_Blue_VioletVALUE #6BABE4- EDGE #??????[/color]

Only Edge is missing.

So Long

Sven

[Willy Tschager]

Use 4d7ba3.

w.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Next one


RING 14,7 - POLISHED

My own Data
Lego ID: 227 
Lego Name: TR. BR. YEL GR
MY guessed name: Transparent Bright Yellowish Green

http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html
No match found

http://wiki.ldraw.org/index.php?title=Us...ison_Chart
Lego ID: 227
Lego Name: Tr. Bright Yellowish Green
RGB: #D4E5AB

http://www.peeron.com/inv/colors
No match found

http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=868566
Lego ID: 227
Lego Name: Transparent Bright Yellowish Green

http://rebrickable.com/colors
Lego ID: 227
Ldraw ID: 35
Bricklink ID: 108
Lego Name: TR. BR. YEL GR
Rebrickable Name: Trans-Bright Green
RGB: #D9E4A7

http://swooshable.com/parts/colors
Lego ID: 227
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: 108
Bricklink Name: na
Lego name: Transparent Light Yellowish Green
RGB: #C9E788

Well, here we go. As far as I know, this color does only exists in one single part. The good thing is, that the Ldraw ID 227 is free. Unfortunately we have three RGB values to choose from. Rebrickable already maps this color to Ldraw 35 (Trans Bright Green). Ldraw 35 is at the same time Lego ID 311 (Transparent Light green) which does fit better from my point of view.
So it's open for discussion how to deal with this one.

So Long

Sven

[Willy Tschager]

[quote pid='23761' dateline='1478633447']
Well, here we go. As far as I know, this color does only exists in one single part. The good thing is, that the Ldraw ID 227 is free. Unfortunately we have three RGB values to choose from. Rebrickable already maps this color to Ldraw 35 (Trans Bright Green). Ldraw 35 is at the same time Lego ID 311 (Transparent Light green) which does fit better from my point of view.
So it's open for discussion how to deal with this one.
[/quote]

According to the time table this is out of production and personally I would map it to LDraw 35 Trans Bright Green.

w.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Next one



MINI WIG MAN

My own Data
Lego ID: 128
Lego Name: DARK NOUGAT
MY guessed name: Dark Nougat

http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html
No match found

http://wiki.ldraw.org/index.php?title=Us...ison_Chart
Lego ID: 128
Ldraw Name: Dark Orange / Earth Orange
Lego Name: Dark Nougat
RGB: #AD6140

http://www.peeron.com/inv/colors
Lego Id: 128
Lego Name: Dark Nougat
RGB: #AE7A59

http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=868566
Lego ID: 128
Lego Name: Dark Nougat

http://rebrickable.com/colors
Lego ID: 128
Ldraw ID: 366
Bricklink ID: 29
Lego Name: DARK NOUGAT
Rebrickable Name: Earth Orange
RGB: #FA9C1C

http://swooshable.com/parts/colors
Lego ID: 128
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: na
Bricklink Name: na
Lego name: Dark Nougat
RGB: #AD6140


Here we've some information available. We have a free LDraw ID and some hints where could map it, if we want to. From my point of view the "Eath Orange" is a little bit to orangish. At least from the lego picture and the one from swooshable. I think it should be more brownish. If we want to map it to an existing color I would prefer "Dark Orange". Or we just create a new color.

So Long

Sven

[Sven v. Beuningen]

[quote pid='23761' dateline='1478633447']
Well, here we go. As far as I know, this color does only exists in one single part. The good thing is, that the Ldraw ID 227 is free. Unfortunately we have three RGB values to choose from. Rebrickable already maps this color to Ldraw 35 (Trans Bright Green). Ldraw 35 is at the same time Lego ID 311 (Transparent Light green) which does fit better from my point of view.
So it's open for discussion how to deal with this one.

According to the time table this is out of production and personally I would map it to LDraw 35 Trans Bright Green.

w.
[/quote]

Ok I mapped it to 35.

So Long

Sven

[Willy Tschager]

Map it to a new color number and use the Swooshable RGB which come close to what I measure in PS.

w.

[Willy Tschager]

Map it to a new color number and use the Swooshable RGB which come close to what I measure in PS.

w.

Go ahead.

w.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Map it to a new color number and use the Swooshable RGB which come close to what I measure in PS.

w.

Go ahead.

w.

Sorry, too much stuff to do. I'll add the next one.

So Long

Sven

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Next one



AXE HEAD W HOLE 3.2, DRUM LAQU

My own Data
Lego ID: 300
Lego Name: COPPER, DR.LA.
MY guessed name: [color=#333333][size=small]Copper Drum Lacq[/size][/color]

http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html
No match found

http://wiki.ldraw.org/index.php?title=Us...ison_Chart
no match found

http://www.peeron.com/inv/colors
no match found

http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=868566
Lego ID: 300
Lego Name: Copper, Drum Lacquered matte copper surface coating

http://rebrickable.com/colors
Lego ID: 134
Ldraw ID: 134
Bricklink ID: 84
Lego Name: COPPER, DR.LA.
Rebrickable Name: Copper
RGB: #AE7A59

http://swooshable.com/parts/colors
Lego ID: 300
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: na
Bricklink Name: na
Lego name: Copper, Drum Lacquered
RGB: #C47949


Here's a new challenge. Only sparse information available. LDraw ID is free. I think the information from rebrickable is somehow wrong. I know for sure that "COPPER, DR.LA." is Lego ID 300. Therefore I wouldn't give much about the RGB value from Rebrickable. I would go with Swooshable. Also their Lego name does make more sense than mine. So I suggest to use LDraw ID 300 and for the name some speckle color. Speckle_Copper? But there is also a "Speckle_Black_Copper".

So Long

Sven

[Magnus Forsberg]

Here's a new challenge. Only sparse information available. LDraw ID is free. I think the information from rebrickable is somehow wrong. I know for sure that "COPPER, DR.LA." is Lego ID 300. Therefore I wouldn't give much about the RGB value from Rebrickable. I would go with Swooshable. Also their Lego name does make more sense than mine. So I suggest to use LDraw ID 300 and for the name some speckle color. Speckle_Copper? But there is also a "Speckle_Black_Copper".

So Long

Sven

No, it should be "Metallic_Copper". It's a metallic paint mainly used on patterned parts.
we already have
Lego Cool Silver Drum Laquer as LDraw Metallic_Silver
Lego  Warm Gold Drum Laquer as LDraw Metallic_Gold

I think #C47949 is too dark. To me its more like #DC9150

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Here's a new challenge. Only sparse information available. LDraw ID is free. I think the information from rebrickable is somehow wrong. I know for sure that "COPPER, DR.LA." is Lego ID 300. Therefore I wouldn't give much about the RGB value from Rebrickable. I would go with Swooshable. Also their Lego name does make more sense than mine. So I suggest to use LDraw ID 300 and for the name some speckle color. Speckle_Copper? But there is also a "Speckle_Black_Copper".

So Long

Sven

No, it should be "Metallic_Copper". It's a metallic paint mainly used on patterned parts.
we already have
Lego Cool Silver Drum Laquer as LDraw Metallic_Silver
Lego  Warm Gold Drum Laquer as LDraw Metallic_Gold

I think #C47949 is too dark. To me its more like #DC9150

I'm also fine with "Metallic_Copper". Willy, what do you think?

So Long

Sven

[Willy Tschager]

Here's a pic with the proposed colors:

   

the color in the middle has been measured in PS. The rest is fine with me.

w.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Next one



Sword

My own Data
Lego ID: 189
Lego Name: RED. GOLD
MY guessed name: Reddish Gold

http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html
No match found

http://wiki.ldraw.org/index.php?title=Us...ison_Chart
Lego ID: 189
Ldraw Name: Copper
Lego Name: Dark Orange / Earth Orange
RGB: #AC8247

http://www.peeron.com/inv/colors
no match found

http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=868566
Lego ID: 189
Lego Name: Reddish Gold

http://rebrickable.com/colors
Lego ID: 139
Ldraw ID: 134
Bricklink ID: 84
Lego Name: RED. GOLD
Rebrickable Name: Copper
RGB: #AE7A59

http://swooshable.com/parts/colors
Lego ID: 189
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: na
Bricklink Name: na
Lego name: Reddish Gold / Gold Metallic
RGB: #AC8247

For this color I'm only aware of the sword on the picture. The Ldraw ID 189 is free. Rebrickable does map this color to the same like before (300), but I think this one is brighter and more goldlike. 

So Long

Sven

[Willy Tschager]

If it's okay with you go with:

189 - Reddish Gold and use the swooshable RGB (rebrickable is too brownish). Don't forget to add a PEARLESCENT statement

w.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

If it's okay with you go with:

189 - Reddish Gold and use the swooshable RGB (rebrickable is too brownish). Don't forget to add a PEARLESCENT statement

w.

Ok thank you.

[Sven v. Beuningen]

Next one



NOSE CONE SMALL 1x1 - TR

My own Data
Lego ID: 329
Lego Name: WHITE GLOW
MY guessed name: White Glow

http://www.ldraw.org/article/547.html
No match found

http://wiki.ldraw.org/index.php?title=Us...ison_Chart
Lego ID: 329
Ldraw Name: Glow in Dark White
Lego Name: White Glow
RGB: #F5F3D7

http://www.peeron.com/inv/colors
no match found

http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=868566
Lego ID: 329
Bricklink id: 159
[size=small]Bricklink Name:Glow In Dark White[/size]
Lego Name: White Glow



http://rebrickable.com/colors
Lego ID: 1005
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: 159
Lego Name: WHITE GLOW
Rebrickable Name: Glow in Dark White
RGB: #D9D9D9

http://swooshable.com/parts/colors
Lego ID: 189
Ldraw ID: na
Bricklink ID: 159
Bricklink Name: na
Lego name: White Glow
RGB: #F5F3D7


Ldraw 329 is free and it seems that everyone wants that this color is named "Glow in Dark White". Well, why not? The RGB from swooshable and the ldraw wiki is the same, so it could fit.

So Long

Sven