Parts 79757.dat

[Orion Pobursky]

https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c.../79757.dat

Can someone explain to me why this is a "Brick" and not a "Slope" (also 79756 and 49307)?

[Gerald Lasser]

I think we shoudl call it slope now for consistency.

I got the name from REbrickable, which calls it a "brick"

[Orion Pobursky]

I got the name from REbrickable, which calls it a "brick"

Rebrickable probably calls it a Brick because we called the 1x1 version a Brick (for some reason)

[Orion Pobursky]

https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c.../79757.dat

Can someone explain to me why this is a "Brick" and not a "Slope" (also 79756 and 49307)?

I pulled the logs from both 49307 (1x1) and 79756 (1x4) and there was no discussion regarding Brick vs. Slope Brick. I think these are Slope Brick. Any contrary opinions?

[Gerald Lasser]

I pulled the logs from both 49307 (1x1) and 79756 (1x4) and there was no discussion regarding Brick vs. Slope Brick. I think these are Slope Brick. Any contrary opinions?

Hm, those are all called "Brick", same as the 6192 (2x4)

[Orion Pobursky]

Hm, those are all called "Brick", same as the 6192 (2x4)

I forgot about the 2x4. Since that's a James part, there's no documented initial discussion and the only other discussion is the one on the current PT revision (which make no mention of Slope vs. Brick).