+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html)
+--- Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: Parts 79757.dat (/thread-26433.html)
Parts 79757.dat - Orion Pobursky - 2022-06-06
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/79757.dat
Can someone explain to me why this is a "Brick" and not a "Slope" (also 79756 and 49307)?
RE: Parts 79757.dat - Gerald Lasser - 2022-06-06
I think we shoudl call it slope now for consistency.
I got the name from REbrickable, which calls it a "brick"
RE: Parts 79757.dat - Orion Pobursky - 2022-06-06
(2022-06-06, 17:10)Gerald Lasser Wrote: I got the name from REbrickable, which calls it a "brick"
Rebrickable probably calls it a Brick because we called the 1x1 version a Brick (for some reason)
RE: Parts 79757.dat - Orion Pobursky - 2022-06-06
(2022-06-06, 15:07)Orion Pobursky Wrote: https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/79757.dat
Can someone explain to me why this is a "Brick" and not a "Slope" (also 79756 and 49307)?
I pulled the logs from both 49307 (1x1) and 79756 (1x4) and there was no discussion regarding Brick vs. Slope Brick. I think these are Slope Brick. Any contrary opinions?
RE: Parts 79757.dat - Gerald Lasser - 2022-06-06
(2022-06-06, 19:05)Orion Pobursky Wrote: I pulled the logs from both 49307 (1x1) and 79756 (1x4) and there was no discussion regarding Brick vs. Slope Brick. I think these are Slope Brick. Any contrary opinions?
Hm, those are all called "Brick", same as the 6192 (2x4)
RE: Parts 79757.dat - Orion Pobursky - 2022-06-06
(2022-06-06, 19:45)Gerald Lasser Wrote: Hm, those are all called "Brick", same as the 6192 (2x4)
I forgot about the 2x4. Since that's a James part, there's no documented initial discussion and the only other discussion is the one on the current PT revision (which make no mention of Slope vs. Brick).