Parts 79757.dat


Parts 79757.dat
#1
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c.../79757.dat

Can someone explain to me why this is a "Brick" and not a "Slope" (also 79756 and 49307)?
Reply
RE: Parts 79757.dat
#2
I think we shoudl call it slope now for consistency.

I got the name from REbrickable, which calls it a "brick"
Reply
RE: Parts 79757.dat
#3
(2022-06-06, 17:10)Gerald Lasser Wrote: I got the name from REbrickable, which calls it a "brick"

Rebrickable probably calls it a Brick because we called the 1x1 version a Brick (for some reason)
Reply
RE: Parts 79757.dat
#4
(2022-06-06, 15:07)Orion Pobursky Wrote: https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c.../79757.dat

Can someone explain to me why this is a "Brick" and not a "Slope" (also 79756 and 49307)?

I pulled the logs from both 49307 (1x1) and 79756 (1x4) and there was no discussion regarding Brick vs. Slope Brick. I think these are Slope Brick. Any contrary opinions?
Reply
RE: Parts 79757.dat
#5
(2022-06-06, 19:05)Orion Pobursky Wrote: I pulled the logs from both 49307 (1x1) and 79756 (1x4) and there was no discussion regarding Brick vs. Slope Brick. I think these are Slope Brick. Any contrary opinions?

Hm, those are all called "Brick", same as the 6192 (2x4)
Reply
RE: Parts 79757.dat
#6
(2022-06-06, 19:45)Gerald Lasser Wrote: Hm, those are all called "Brick", same as the 6192 (2x4)

I forgot about the 2x4. Since that's a James part, there's no documented initial discussion and the only other discussion is the one on the current PT revision (which make no mention of Slope vs. Brick).
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)