| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,696
» Latest member: mrlu
» Forum threads: 6,417
» Forum posts: 53,206
Full Statistics
|
| Latest Threads |
2026 - New Parts -> Raw M...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
1 hour ago
» Replies: 5
» Views: 130
|
Smort brick stuff
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Jeff Jones
7 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 145
|
Technic 1993
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
8 hours ago
» Replies: 5
» Views: 7,523
|
Part request for 4518c an...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Alfred Schmitz
10 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 140
|
2026 - New Parts -> Raw M...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Gerald Lasser
Yesterday, 20:43
» Replies: 3
» Views: 1,591
|
4175 part depth appears t...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Evert-Jan Boer
Yesterday, 13:28
» Replies: 1
» Views: 121
|
Discussion - proposal to ...
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: N. W. Perry
Yesterday, 4:50
» Replies: 60
» Views: 7,018
|
Animal minifigure heads l...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Timothy Hall
Yesterday, 3:41
» Replies: 20
» Views: 17,222
|
Parts request, set 42224,...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Alfred Schmitz
2026-02-28, 17:11
» Replies: 2
» Views: 265
|
2026/2027 LDraw.org Steer...
Forum: LDraw.org Announcements
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2026-02-28, 9:55
» Replies: 50
» Views: 6,605
|
|
|
| LDraw.org 2024-04 Parts Update Now Available |
|
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2024-05-28, 4:10 - Forum: LDraw.org Announcements
- Replies (4)
|
 |
The 2024-04 LDraw Parts Update has been released. This update adds 568 new files to the core library, including 357 new parts and 25 new primitives.
Thanks are due to all the part authors who created or corrected parts for this release. The small, but dedicated, band of reviewers also play an important role in keeping files moving through the Parts Tracker and deserve just as much credit. This update wouldn't have been possible without their dedication and attention to detail.
You can preview the new parts in 2024-04 here, and download the zip-file update or Windows install package here.
Thank you to all the testers and parts authors who continue feedback for the new PT software. This project would not be what it is without your help.
Orion Pobursky
LDraw.org Parts Library Admin
|
|
|
| Timeline update |
|
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2024-05-25, 18:18 - Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
- No Replies
|
 |
After the release this Monday (5/27) I'm going pause new feature addition to the PT to embark on some housekeeping. Specifically:
- Update the server to the latest version of our Linux distro
- With that, write scripts to automate this process.
- Do a complete code review and streamline/refactor files
Additionally:
- Update and reformat the Official Library Spec and Number Spec.
This will probably take the better part of a month and may involve some extended outages.
Bug fixes will continue to be addressed as they occur.
|
|
|
| Numbering of complete minifig upper part |
|
Posted by: Manfred Schaefer - 2024-05-24, 17:24 - Forum: Help
- No Replies
|
 |
Hello,
I have seen two complete minifig upper parts on the Parts Tracker.
They are the parts 76382pdg1 and 76382pdg7.
I would add c01 to the numbering, as it is possible that there may be the same part with hands in a different color at some point. The character sequence dg1, dg7 stands for the printing and c01 stands for the design.
As an example, see also on Bricklink the parts 973px61c01 and 973px61c02. These parts are identical except for the color of the arms.
Greetings
Manfred
|
|
|
| The .io file system thumbnail |
|
Posted by: linghank - 2024-05-23, 8:13 - Forum: Help
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Stud.io's native *.io file already contains thumbnail picture of the model in editor, yet it does not show/use it as a thumbnail in Windows Explorer, but instead it uses Studio default icon for all the model files.
This results in that when we have many mocs in a folder, we can only distinguish them by name.
So,can someone develop a plugin to achieve this functionality?
|
|
|
| Request for Comments: New Type Qualifiers |
|
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2024-05-21, 14:04 - Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
- Replies (8)
|
 |
I'd like to add 2 new type qualifiers to the !LDRAW_ORG meta:
Pattern and Assembly
- Since the pCC©/pNNNN suffix is used for both dual mold and printed parts, Pattern will be used to denote a printed part. There might also be a use for a dual mold qualifier.
- Assembly with be used to denote a shortcut that LEGO normally produces and distributes as one unit. Think torso with hands and arms, the 1x1 lever, or electric motors. This will not apply to further shortcuts that combine more parts, like the electric motor and cable shortcuts.
|
|
|
| Search keyword in submodel |
|
Posted by: Jaco van der Molen - 2024-05-21, 13:07 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hi,
While working on a model with submodels I like to add a keyword to some submodels.
Would it be possible in LDCad to search for this keyword in the part bin "All models"?
This does not seem to work.
In the Part bin display filter I checked to look in Keywords and choose OR at the Match kind
Tnx.
Jaco
|
|
|
| 0 NAME and 0 FILE: to sync or not to sync? |
|
Posted by: N. W. Perry - 2024-05-20, 19:32 - Forum: Help
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Kind of a random and trivial inquiry, but one I keep going back and forth on…
In model files, do you prefer that an MPD filename (the 0 FILE meta) always match the—well, the file name, i.e. the 0 Name meta?
LDCad, for example, offers the option to sync these two metas by default, and it's also required by the OMR spec. But apart from that, are there reasons why these two entries should or should not always match?
Couple of points I can think of: - The 0 FILE meta accepts a filename as a parameter. If this filename is always the same as the 0 NAME meta, why would it need to appear again as a parameter for 0 FILE?
- I've always understood 0 NAME to be the filename as it's saved in my system. At least, that's how it is for parts, including whether it's saved in the s/ or 48/ directories. But for the main subfile of an MPD, it's expected that the filename be "main.ldr", which is not how the parent file is saved. (I know they're different, but the parent file is really nothing but an empty wrapper, and it doesn't have its own header other than that of the main subfile.)
What do others do? Does it ever break anything, other than maybe OMR compliance, if these entries don't match?
|
|
|
|