Hi,
Here is the most huge official technic model ever

You can download my model at http://pds22.egloos.com/pds/201111/29/09/8110.zip
LDR file contain the code line for stickers but L3B file don't, because SR3D couldn't read the file with the stickers to the end.
I recommend that if you want to use SR3D, then choose L3B file, and if LDview or MLCAD, then LDR file.

Here is the sticker files that I used as reference. (You should download at parts folder and do 'Scan part' in MLCAD)
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=4622303
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=4631649

Enjoy

KWON

Attached Files

  8110.ldr (Size: 562.58 KB / Downloads: 28)
  8110.L3B (Size: 551.03 KB / Downloads: 7)

Personally I've always got a bit annoyed seeing embedded images larger than about 500x500px. They take up too much screen real estate and, more importantly, make browsing on small screen devices like phones very difficult. Not to mention the excessive bandwidth.

So I'd like to see a maximum size limit imposed on them. Whether by request or software.

Tim

I think that it might be a good idea to open Annoucements to responses. We've already got a place to make announcements that can't be responded to (on the website) and, many of the topics we've opened have to be duplicated elsewhere for further discussion (most recently by Travis).

I'm not saying anyone would be able to start a topic there, but I do think allowing responses would be a good thing.

Tim

This is so cool! It's still Nov 28 here, and I wrote this post tomorrow.

Hi Travis,

Just to point you to a thread and solutions about a bug in your POVray export.

http://forums.ldraw.org/showthread.php?t...79#pid1579

Tim

Hi,

the LDraw Steering Committee (SteerCo) has been questioned what their opinion is about the possibility of charging for a third party program. The following should be taken as guideline:

Should any person wish to charge money for a third party program using the LDraw Parts Library, the LDraw SteerCo strongly recommends that it is made clear that the charge is for the program itself and not for any derivative of the LDraw Parts Library. The intent of the CC license for the library should be made clear and it should include due credit to reward the efforts of all those who have contributed to the library. We would appreciate that the LDraw logo, as well as a link to the website are included and possibly featured prominently. It should also be made clear that the author is not representing himself as LDraw.org.

Furthermore, where possible, the SteerCo would also appreciate a donation be made to Peeron.com as hosts of LDraw.org (a Paypal Donation Button can be found in the top left-hand corner of LDraw's homepage). This is, however, not by any means a requirement.

Willy Tschager
On behalf of the LDraw Steering Committee

Aloha,

I modified L3P Launcher to work on my system:

1. Updated the enclosed binary of L3P.
2. Changed the Applescript that it uses to open the processed files in MegaPOV.

Please let me know if it works for you <http://db.tt/1khsbeyK>.

Mahalo,

Ramón

Aloha,

Does anyone have a copy of MPDWizard by Orion Pobursky for OSX?

Mahalo,

Ramón

Hi,

I faced another problem between Pov-ray and Sticker.

Look at the picture, please.

The first is a screen shot in LDview and the second is a rendered image by Pov-Ray 3.7RC3.





I can see sticker pattern in LDview but can't see it in the picture that is rendered by Pov-Ray.

Pov file was made by L3P 1.3.

If anybody know about this problem, let me know, please.

Thanks for reading.

KWON

hi,
i have run into problems while finishing a minifig head pattern. when i take a look at the result in ldview (quality mode), usually the edges with conditional lines are smoothed out, but not this time. the overall look is some kind of "ok", but there are several regions that look strange.

here is what i did:
1. created flat pattern
2. sliced with slicer pro, then optimized the result manually (e.g. re-triangulation with new vertices)
3. projected with slicer pro onto former shape
4. to get rid of some rounding errors (0.00000001), i used former shape as subpart in shaped pattern, and snapped on it with unificator
5. checked with planarcheck, found no problems
6. created conditional lines with edger2

however, the result is not satisfying me. i tried with several different thresholds and precision settings, but i don't know exactly at which point the problem occurs. maybe someone can give me a hint what to do?

here is a screenshot of what i'm talking about:



i discovered this in some other minifig heads, but there must be 1) a reason for this, and 2) a solution how to avoid it?
any help is appreciated.

greetings,
christian