Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 4,632
» Latest member: Robert Cruise
» Forum threads: 5,786
» Forum posts: 49,430

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 315 online users.
» 1 Member(s) | 311 Guest(s)
Baidu, Bing, Google

Latest Threads
James Jessiman Memorial A...
Forum: LDraw.org Announcements
Last Post: Magnus Forsberg
3 hours ago
» Replies: 3
» Views: 72
A request for a simple sc...
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: HWQ
Today, 1:30
» Replies: 4
» Views: 268
Parts Request: 3 CLOTH PI...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: 3CFigs
Yesterday, 21:30
» Replies: 0
» Views: 217
Packing LDraw Files
Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
Last Post: Cam's Bricks
Yesterday, 12:52
» Replies: 1
» Views: 146
Tile 1x1 Round with Black...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Evert-Jan Boer
2024-12-22, 14:00
» Replies: 2
» Views: 142
part mesh request from un...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Jeff Jones
2024-12-22, 12:49
» Replies: 38
» Views: 2,001
Minifig Torso Generator
Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
Last Post: Rene Rechthaler
2024-12-21, 16:44
» Replies: 13
» Views: 639
Friends 2014
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2024-12-21, 15:57
» Replies: 8
» Views: 3,138
Subfile for pattern
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Magnus Forsberg
2024-12-21, 14:21
» Replies: 2
» Views: 190
Brick 1x1 with curved top
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: SNIPE
2024-12-20, 21:08
» Replies: 3
» Views: 498

 
  [Poll] To where should the top-left picture link?
Posted by: Tim Gould - 2011-12-06, 22:35 - Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion - Replies (32)

Personally I find it really frustrating that the LDraw.org logo in the top left corner links to the main website and not the forums. But I suspect that its 'natural destination' might vary depending on who you are.

So I'd like to take a poll of people here to see what users think. When it comes to UI issues like this I figure the users are collectively more accurate than the webmasters.

So please vote. I've left it open indefinitely but the sooner we get a bunch of votes (and a trend) the sooner decisions can be made one way or another.

Tim

Print this item

Thumbs Up Part Request: Minifig Torso Peeron part number 973px423
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2011-12-06, 22:32 - Forum: Part Requests - Replies (3)

A cursory scan didn't turn up 'Minifig Torso with Jacket, Zippered Pockets, and Classic Space Logo Pattern' (973px423).  Request that this part be authored.  I have a reasonably high-res scan if it would be of use.

Print this item

  CC-Files
Posted by: Max Martin Richter - 2011-12-06, 17:35 - Forum: Official Models - Replies (12)

Here are the files for:

  • Cafe Corner
  • Green Grocer
  • Market Street

I think, there are some parts missing (the apples and minifig-parts for example) but all in all it's complete.
And I had forgotten: it's not OMR-conform.

Max



Attached Files
.mpd   10182-07.mpd (Size: 258.81 KB / Downloads: 7)
.mpd   10190-07.mpd (Size: 99.76 KB / Downloads: 6)
.ldr   10185-09.ldr (Size: 138.31 KB / Downloads: 7)
Print this item

  How to stretch rubber bands after they are inserted
Posted by: Jean-Philippe Ouellet - 2011-12-06, 16:55 - Forum: Help - Replies (3)

I am building the 5763 Dune Hopper.

In step 16, it says to insert a rubber band like so:
[Image: E8QIG.png]

Then in step 20, it says to stretch the rubber band like so:
[Image: FDIPG.png]

Creating the rubber bands themselves shouldn't be a problem, I can just use LSynth. The problem arises when I need to stretch the rubber bands.

As far as I can tell, there is no provision for modifying or removing parts already in a model.

My first thought was to simply insert the rubber bands for the first time in step 20, but if you were to build this model with real legos, inserting them in step 20 would be impossible because they are attached to 4623 ("Plate 1 x 2 with Arm") which has a plate at the top of the arm, thus making the closed loop of the rubber band inside the closed loop formed by the bricks... it can't simply be slipped in.

What is the proper way of accomplishing this?



Also... How do we remove parts from steps in general. If my memory serves from helping a friend build the 8053 Mobile Crane it requires you to build an assembly to place on the axles of the vehicle while building the transmission to ensure that the wheels are all aligned while you assemble the transmission, and then remove the wheel-alignment assembly, and re-use those parts later. It would be easy enough to simply ignore the assembly entirely as it is not part of the final model, but I believe people should be able to build a real-lego model from the steps in the models in the OMR the same exact way as if they were following the actual instruction booklet.

Print this item

  Lost ability to post New Topic in Announcements
Posted by: Chris Dee - 2011-12-06, 16:08 - Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion - Replies (5)

The subject says it all, although I can reply to existing threads.

Print this item

Thumbs Up Windscreen, Motorcycle Windshield
Posted by: Christoph Mierowski - 2011-12-06, 15:40 - Forum: Part Requests - Replies (3)

Would be nice if somebody could do this part:

http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=bb57&in=S

There is also a pattern version :http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=bb57pb01

Thanks to anybody who does this part

Print this item

  SR 3D Builder 0.6.0.9
Posted by: Sergio Reano - 2011-12-06, 9:48 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers - No Replies

Hi everybody,

another updated version of my application is now available.
http://sr3dbuilder.altervista.org/

Nothing really new, just a bunch of significant fixes.
Here is a list of changes:

Fixed
- On a fresh installation the creation of a folder with a wrong name does not let the application start
- The "pin long with friction" part has problem in rotations and animations
- Closing the application with the "X" cause the application to crash
- Editing a model with assemblies and adding new ones cause wrong assemblies identifiers
- Occasionally some subparts fails to load from a previously saved model
- Importing a model cause main model name override

Changed
- Linear actuators now move with in more natural way

Added
- <CTRL-F> shortcut to put the cursor in the Search text box
- Location and resizing mode of the toolbox are now saved and restored on application startup
- Updated part list availability (december 2, 2012)

Enjoy

Sergio

Print this item

Thumbs Up Missing two part yet
Posted by: Oh-Seong KWON - 2011-12-06, 1:43 - Forum: Part Requests - Replies (4)

Hi,

These parts was produced over 10 years ago, but I can't find these in MLCAD part library.

http://peeron.com/inv/parts/973px71

http://peeron.com/inv/parts/3626bpx34

Let me know where it is or somebody author it as soon as possible, please.

KWON

Print this item

  50746 or 54200
Posted by: Jean-Philippe Ouellet - 2011-12-06, 0:05 - Forum: Parts Authoring - Replies (1)

Not sure where to post this.

In the 5763 Dune Hopper (scroll to the bottom) it says 50746 in the parts catalog, but the peeron description of that part is "~ Use 54200"

Which one do I use. 50746 is (reportedly, I don't own it) the part number used in the actual piece in the actual set, but someone somewhere (not sure who or where) says to use 54200.

From 50746.dat:

Code:
0 Slope Brick 31  1 x  1 x   2/3
...
0 !HELP Part 50746 is the counterpart of 54200. Visually, the two parts seem
0 !HELP identical. This file is provided to make it easier to locate part files
0 !HELP when using the numbers from other sources.
0 !HELP 54200 is used for moulding opaque parts, 50746 for transparent parts.

From 54200.dat:
Code:
0 Slope Brick 31  1 x  1 x   2/3

They both have the same part name. Peeron says the set contains 50746, but it is light bluish gray... not transparent.

So far, I'm leaning towards 54200 because of the !HELP lines, but I'd like an official word here since peeron contradicts itself.

Thoughts?

EDIT: I had written dark bluish gray, its actually light bluish gray.

Print this item

  LDraw vs. LDD: 8 - 3
Posted by: Philippe Hurbain - 2011-12-05, 9:47 - Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion - Replies (3)

In the recent TechnicBricks challenge (reverse engineer a 2012 Technic model and produce a CAD model), 8 out of 11 submissions were made with LDraw! LDD was hampered with a big problem: the 3711 chain link (a key element in the model) is missing in the latest release...
In the LDraw camp, I was surprised to see that "only" two models were created with SR3D builder, despite the many odd angles of this building...

Print this item