Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,312
» Latest member: KarriWatt
» Forum threads: 6,177
» Forum posts: 51,783
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 281 online users. » 2 Member(s) | 274 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, Yandex, Orion Pobursky
|
Latest Threads |
Batman Cowls
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Peter Grass
33 minutes ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 62
|
A fresh list of "most com...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: tom alphin
1 hour ago
» Replies: 7
» Views: 497
|
Transparent sticker colou...
Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
Last Post: N. W. Perry
6 hours ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 181
|
Fix for slightly incorrec...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Huib Versteeg
Yesterday, 9:50
» Replies: 4
» Views: 739
|
Lego Town Racer 1996 - 63...
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
2025-09-13, 23:39
» Replies: 14
» Views: 1,917
|
Eyesight on Linux
Forum: Rendering Techniques
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
2025-09-13, 18:56
» Replies: 12
» Views: 8,583
|
Another common varient: 1...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Rene Rechthaler
2025-09-12, 14:51
» Replies: 8
» Views: 5,524
|
1Lx1Lx2L brick with studs...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: SNIPE
2025-09-12, 10:14
» Replies: 0
» Views: 659
|
LDraw Colors for OpenScad
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Hageta
2025-09-12, 10:03
» Replies: 0
» Views: 585
|
Img4Dat integrated in LDP...
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Nils Schmidt
2025-09-11, 20:04
» Replies: 6
» Views: 1,008
|
|
|
Banner differences |
Posted by: Ronald Vallenduuk - 2013-11-20, 15:58 - Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion
- Replies (17)
|
 |
A little detail that just caught my eye: The banner image and text on Parts tracker is different from other parts of the site.
Most pages have the same image of a partly transparent 2x3 brick and the text "LDraw.org Centralised LDraw Resources" in British English spelling. The image on Parts Tracker is similar but without the inner tube and with a slightly different colour and camera angle, and it has the text in American spelling: "Centralized LDraw Resources".
|
|
|
Primitive naming |
Posted by: Ronald Vallenduuk - 2013-11-16, 23:42 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (7)
|
 |
If I want to do a prism primitive similar to tri3a1, but with one right-angle side and the diagonal side, what should that be called?
In general, what is the naming scheme for primitives? Looking at all the various cube-based primitives I haven't found the logic yet...
|
|
|
How to "inline" a sub-model? |
Posted by: Michael Horvath - 2013-11-16, 20:55 - Forum: LDraw File Processing and Conversion
- Replies (37)
|
 |
I noticed that Tore Eriksson "inlined" a lot of parts in Datsville in the past. I'm not sure exactly what that means, but I'm guessing it means removing a model from a sub-assembly and placing it in a higher-level parent model without messing up the model's position.
I would like to do the same. I would like to extract minifigures from within individual MPD models and place them in a higher "traffic" layer without screwing up their positions.
Am I being clear? How do I accomplish this?
|
|
|
Dark green? |
Posted by: Michael Horvath - 2013-11-15, 18:38 - Forum: MOCs (My Own Creations)
- Replies (10)
|
 |
In this video the person uses I think three different shades of green. I could only find one shade in MLCad plus chrome green and trans green. Is there a list of colors somewhere I need to update? Where do I get the latest version?
|
|
|
numbering scheme for assemblies |
Posted by: Steffen - 2013-11-13, 11:00 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (11)
|
 |
At part
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cg...343c02.dat
on the parts tracker, an important question got raised,
which is probably complicated to discuss, so I suggest to relocate it to here:
the problem is: what filename should we assign to assemblies?
let's assume we have a door 4343.dat, and a glass 4344.dat.
Let me describe the common practice of the past first:
Our technique was - not knowing official TLG item or design IDs -
to use the "main" part, here: the door, of the assembly and number the assembly after it.
Thus, in our case, 4343c01.dat was the result.
In some assemblies it's unclear what the "main", "dominant" contributing part is, but you have to make a decision.
In that assembly, that main part usually gets color 16 to still let the user colorize it as desired.
NOWADAYS we do know some of the item or design IDs of such assemblies.
The question that now arises is how we deal with that. Let's assume, we somehow know that the assembly
should get number 123456789. What to do now?
The options we have is:
(a) abolish the ...c01 suffix technique at all in this case, just using 123456789.dat for the assembly
(b) keeping the old technique, i.e., 4343c01.dat, and creating an alias 123456789.dat pointing to there
© using 123456789c01.dat, i.e., mixing the 2 concepts
Sadly, all 3 options have disadvantages 
Solution (a) drops 2 nice features of our library:
- you can recognize from the filename to which part an assembly belongs to, i.e. 4343c01.dat belongs to 4343.dat
- the ...c01 suffix is nicely matching the ...s01 and ...p01 and ...d01 suffixes
Solution (b) creates 2 files instead of 1.
Solution © is IMHO totally misleading. It suggests that 123456789c01.dat contains an assembly of 123456789.dat, i.e., an assembly of an assembly. So to me, this is the weakest of all 3 options.
To me, the smallest disadvantage is solution (b), because we anyway create shortcuts and aliases all the time.
Would we correctly create 123456789.dat as an alias, having a leading "=" in its name, then users even can
leave away such files if they find them to be clutter.
So my opinion is to use option (b).
|
|
|
Origin for curved track parts |
Posted by: Ronald Vallenduuk - 2013-11-13, 0:09 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (2)
|
 |
In the reviews for part 85976.dat (Train Track 4Wide Curved) there are some comments about the origin for curved track parts. I thought it might be better to have that discussion here so it can still be easily found after 85976 becomes official.
When I created the part I put the origin in the middle of the middle sleeper to be consistent with existing track parts. Having it there is kinda consistent with the straight track part but I appreciate it may not be very intuitive to manipulate the part in MLCad. However it's not all that bad. When I do curved track parts I use the same trick I use for many rotations, my trusted friend the lime green light saber bar. I place it in the centre of rotation, select it, then select the part(s) I want to rotate and use the keys to make the actual rotation. If only it was a little easier to get to the grid step and rotation settings in MLCad...
|
|
|
|