Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,163
» Latest member: Spanneke
» Forum threads: 6,082
» Forum posts: 51,262
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 619 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 613 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, Yandex, Jeff Jones
|
Latest Threads |
Owl with spread wings
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Philippe Hurbain
2 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 34
|
Modulex parts
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Orion Pobursky
4 hours ago
» Replies: 32
» Views: 4,598
|
80503pb01 lute instrument...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: N. W. Perry
2025-07-16, 14:24
» Replies: 9
» Views: 5,987
|
Parts we are Working on -...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Jeff Jones
2025-07-16, 10:14
» Replies: 158
» Views: 152,288
|
Same set, different sheet...
Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
Last Post: Magnus Forsberg
2025-07-15, 6:15
» Replies: 8
» Views: 496
|
71613/30346c01 too high?!
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
2025-07-14, 23:21
» Replies: 18
» Views: 4,912
|
5724pr0001 Bubble Canopy ...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: SNIPE
2025-07-12, 21:08
» Replies: 2
» Views: 410
|
Friends 2014
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2025-07-11, 16:20
» Replies: 18
» Views: 17,361
|
LDCAD about Add custom p...
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Nate87
2025-07-11, 8:13
» Replies: 5
» Views: 3,320
|
Hi-res logo primitives
Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
Last Post: Jens Brühl
2025-07-10, 20:40
» Replies: 16
» Views: 2,253
|
|
|
Numbering of Sticker Parts |
Posted by: Gerald Lasser - 2019-09-18, 6:49 - Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards
- Replies (9)
|
 |
As we are in the progress of amending the Sticker Specifications, what do you think of adding this one:
recently, LEGO started to print numbers next to their stickers to easier identify them, it looks like common sense to include this number as a letter in the part number, i.e. 01 -> "a", etc.
If there are more than 26 stickers on a sheet, they should be numbered as 27 -> aa, 28 -> ab
WOuld it make sense to add this and is it compatible with the library, i.e. was there enough common sense in the past to number the stickers accordingly since they introduced this scheme?
|
|
|
[LDCad] Use script to create submodel |
Posted by: Jaco van der Molen - 2019-09-16, 19:15 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (7)
|
 |
Hi all,
Is it possible to use a script to create a submodel in LDCad?
I ask this because I have to create multiple submodels that all require some basic other (LPub3D) metacommands and one or more parts, always in the same place.
This should be done by looping through a simple series of model names and descriptions.
I need to have submodels called A1, A2, A3, A4, .... A16
And B1, B2, B3 to B16 etc.
All the way to H.
Then I need submodels LA1, LA2, etc. to LH16
The A1, B1, etc. submodels should all have these lines:
Code: 0 ROTSTEP 90 180 0 ABS
0 !LPUB CALLOUT BEGIN
1 16 0 0 0 -0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 -0.5 LA1.ldr
0 !LPUB CALLOUT END
0 !LPUB ASSEM MODEL_SCALE LOCAL 1.2500
0 !LPUB PLI BEGIN IGN
1 71 -150 0 150 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 91405.dat
0 !LPUB PLI END
Where in line 3 LA1.ldr is, of course, incremental like LA2, LA3, etc.
The LA1, LA2, etc. submodels should have more part lines in them and all start looking like this:
Code: 0 !LPUB ASSEM MODEL_SCALE LOCAL 0.3500
0 !LPUB PLI BEGIN IGN
[many part lines, all the same]
0 !LPUB PLI END
I was thinking about creating some sort of array that contains the names of the submodel files and then loop through to create all the submodels I need.
At least, that is my theory if I can use a script.
Or: can it be done another way?
Thanks all.
|
|
|
On the packaging of ldraw-parts and ldraw-mklist |
Posted by: Sylvain Corlay - 2019-09-16, 16:23 - Forum: Help
- Replies (7)
|
 |
Hello World,
Thank you for the amazing work!
I have been working on the packaging of ldraw for the conda package manager (both ldraw-parts and ldraw-list) and I have come across a couple of pitfalls I wanted to report back - even though it is not completely a blocker for moving forward.
1. mklist
- The mklist package does not build out of the box. Everyone (FreeBSD, Debian, ArchLinux) appears to be applying the same patches to the makefile and sources so that it builds succesfully (and I had to do so as well). It may be worth including these patches upstream and bump the version of mklist which has not been updated in a while. If the package was hosted on GitHub or GitLab, it may be easier to submit patches back.
- The mklist source tarball is included in the parts zip file, including built artefacts for windows. Since it is a very simple program, I think that it is fine to provide a built executable on the website, although the parts library and mklist may be better separated.
- Quick note if anyone on this forum is involved in the debian packaging: the version number for the ldraw-mklist debian package appears to be the same as for parts library, while it should really be 1.6.
2. Persistent source tarballs for the parts library
It seems that with every update of the parts library, the new parts are uploaded in a separate zip file, while the complete.zip file is overwritten with the new version of the full library.
This may be an issue because old versions of complete.zip are not available anymore and we can't use a persistent URL for a given version. If you kept a complete-????.zip around for each release, we would be able to point to it persistently.
I am looking forward to hearing back, and super excited to work on the packaging of the lego CAD stack for conda!
Cheers,
|
|
|
4864bpx2/4864bpx3 Update? |
Posted by: Cam's Bricks - 2019-09-16, 14:41 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Hello,
I am working on some instructions that will use this part but in some other, custom, colors. Would it be possible to get this part re configured such that the panel is always trans clear and the color of the printing is the selectable color.
Thanks,
Cameron
|
|
|
Call for votes: Update sticker spec wording relating to sticker sheet color |
Posted by: Travis Cobbs - 2019-09-13, 5:31 - Forum: Standards Board
- Replies (6)
|
 |
Please vote on the following change to the Official Library Specification for Sticker Parts:
Update the following text:
Quote:The sticker pattern is modelled in its true colours; they are not modifiable from the outside. All printed colours of the pattern must be matched, and the background (non-printed portion) of the pattern must use colour 16. Mimicking a colour by blending in the background colour of the part underneath using colour 16 is not allowed.
Change it to read:
Quote:The sticker pattern is modelled in its true colours; they are not modifiable from the outside. All colours of the top surface must be matched, and the back side and sides of the sticker must use colour 16. Print on a transparent plastic sticker sheet should use colour 16 on the transparent part of the top surface.
|
|
|
Update sticker spec wording relating to sticker sheet color |
Posted by: Travis Cobbs - 2019-09-11, 21:06 - Forum: Standards Board
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Currently, the following text exists in the sticker spec:
Quote:The sticker pattern is modelled in its true colours; they are not modifiable from the outside. All printed colours of the pattern must be matched, and the background (non-printed portion) of the pattern must use colour 16. Mimicking a colour by blending in the background colour of the part underneath using colour 16 is not allowed.
This proposal is to change the above text to instead read:
Quote:The sticker pattern is modelled in its true colours; they are not modifiable from the outside. All colours of the top surface must be matched, and the back side and sides of the sticker must use colour 16. Print on a transparent plastic sticker sheet should use colour 16 on the transparent part of the top surface.
|
|
|
Help requests? |
Posted by: ShireBrickz.com - 2019-09-11, 20:30 - Forum: Help Wanted
- Replies (1)
|
 |
It appears to have been 12 months since the last post in this forum so I thought I would bump one up.
Are there any things needing help for the running, maintenance or development of the LDraw group at the moment?
Whilst there are many people who I am sure are more qualified than I am on here, I am still happy to assist in any way possible. Even happy if this post is enough to bump the memory of those people with specialist knowledge to help in some way.
Cheer
Adam
|
|
|
LDraw Mobile Client |
Posted by: Afynyth Ten - 2019-09-11, 7:06 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Currently I've been using Buf3D+ on my Google Pixel 2 XL but I was curious to know if LDraw team has any plans to release a dedicated mobile client in near future..
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Regards, [font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Afynyth Showbox[/font]
|
|
|
|