| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 4 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 1 Guest(s) Baidu, Bing, Google
|
| Latest Threads |
Missing Roboforce 1997 Mi...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Zack Uhlenhuth
Today, 5:07
» Replies: 1
» Views: 252
|
Missing Adventurers Brick...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Zack Uhlenhuth
Today, 5:05
» Replies: 0
» Views: 60
|
Stickers from 6000 - LEGO...
Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
Last Post: legolex76
Yesterday, 9:51
» Replies: 15
» Views: 12,930
|
ModelScope XR - VR model ...
Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
Last Post: Wyatt Stone
2026-07-26, 17:19
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,355
|
Missing Ninja 1998 Minifi...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Zack Uhlenhuth
2026-07-25, 17:53
» Replies: 6
» Views: 736
|
Missing Adventurers Minif...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Zack Uhlenhuth
2026-07-25, 15:21
» Replies: 2
» Views: 314
|
1970's - LEGOland and hob...
Forum: Official Models
Last Post: Takeshi Takahashi
2026-07-25, 2:38
» Replies: 155
» Views: 275,824
|
Wrong set name
Forum: Parts Authoring
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
2026-07-24, 16:27
» Replies: 3
» Views: 370
|
14290pb02 Chima Fox Mask
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Chris Böhnke
2026-07-24, 9:20
» Replies: 1
» Views: 246
|
Part request 7168 and 716...
Forum: Part Requests
Last Post: Jens Brühl
2026-07-23, 17:09
» Replies: 3
» Views: 492
|
|
|
| Matrix math for curved prims |
|
Posted by: N. W. Perry - 2022-12-01, 19:19 - Forum: Parts Authoring
- No Replies
|
 |
Is it possible to get a rotation matrix for a circular primitive, given a simple (I guess quadratic) Bézier curve?
All of our curved prims are circles or conical, and I’ve read that any affine transformation of a conic section will result in another conic section. If the simple Bézier curves are likewise conic (which may be a wrong assumption), then theoretically they can all be represented by a 2D shear matrix, right?
|
|
|
| Parts Tracker bug in release script (non-critical) |
|
Posted by: Orion Pobursky - 2022-11-30, 4:42 - Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
- Replies (1)
|
 |
I found a bug in the release script of the PT. If the first lines after the header are TEXMAP lines, the !HISTORY line for the release after those TEXMAP metas. I've currently found 6 affected parts in the Official Library:
parts/36069ap01.dat
parts/36069bp01.dat
parts/98088p01.dat
parts/98088p02.dat
parts/98088p03.dat
parts/98088p04.dat
If you find any more, let me know.
Note: This does not affect any visible aspects of the part. The only problem is that the header is out of compliance with the Header Spec.
I'll track the down the source of the bug and recycle the affected parts for the 2022-06 release.
|
|
|
| Brick Sizing |
|
Posted by: Loren King - 2022-11-28, 10:10 - Forum: Help
- No Replies
|
 |
Good morning everyone! I have one question and I haven't been able to find it in the forums. What are the recommended settings for my Creality Ender 3 Pro? I've seen settings on websites that recommend a 1.2mm wall thickness with 4 layers iirc but those bricks don't fit well together without sanding. Any advice would be greatly appreciated on this. Also, thank you to all for having such a fantastic community!
-King04758
|
|
|
| Part 45677 and 52031 |
|
Posted by: Takeshi Takahashi - 2022-11-26, 12:09 - Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion
- No Replies
|
 |
I've found the descriptions of these two parts 45677 and 52031 are inconsistent, while creating sticker shortcuts.
45677 Wedge 4 x 4 x 0.667 Curved
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-par...rtid=45677
52031 Slope Brick 45 4 x 6 x 0.667 Double Curved
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-par...rtid=52031
The top curvature and side tapers are exactly the same between the two, but only the width differs (4 stud wide vs 6 stud wide).
According to the file history, Chris made the change of description of 52031 in 2019 and not for 45677.
I think this change would be reasonable:
45677 Slope Brick 45 4 x 4 x 0.667 Double Curved
Moreover, as both of these parts have some substandard (lots of T-junctions, invalid condlines and upper-case references), they need to be reworked in near future. (including splitting top printable surfaces)
|
|
|
|