Incorrect reference to Bricklink

[Manfred Schaefer]

Hello,

For the upper body 76382p8h, either the reference to Bricklink is incorrect or the color of the hands is wrong. It is an official part.
There are two versions on Bricklink.

Version 973pb0320c01 with yellow hands:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/cat...or.%5D#T=I

and version 973pb0320c02 with light nougat hands:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/cat...or.%5D#T=I

If I were to upload both versions to the Parts Tracker, the reference would be incorrect again the next time it was released, as Rebrickable has an incorrect reference to Bricklink.
For 973pb0320c01, Rebrickable cannot find a part in LDraw.
For 973pb0320c02, Rebrickable refers to 76382p8h, but this part has yellow hands instead of light nougat hands.

My suggestion would be to change the color of the hands on the official part to light nougat and create a second part with yellow hands.
Then the references in the official part will be correct and the new part should hopefully be referenced correctly.

Alternatively, I could upload another version with light nougat hands to the Parts Tracker and hope that the referencing works correctly.

Best regards,

Manfred

[Chris Böhnke]

I tried to fix this (seems to be my bad anyways   ), however the server prevented me from changing it correctly (neither by new upload nor by direct editing).

Changing the hands colour is not an option - the part was already official, so this could cause issues.

The L. Nougat version is now 76382p0023.

There's also supposed to be Red/Brown pen versions of this torso (I think only the yellow hands version had both). Do we need the Red Pen version too?

[Orion Pobursky]

You have to submit a change request to Rebrickable. The PT pull all its info from Rebrickable so if it's wrong, we're wrong.

[Chris Böhnke]

Sure it's this way around?

The error was me uploading that part a year or so ago with the incorrect links (and it got certified that way). Usually I could just overwrite that and the link is correct. But now this seems no longer possible, since the PT simply deletes my new RB keyword, thus keeps the old link.

Note that there are 2 versions of this (with different hands colour). As far as I can tell, RB is correct with their entry. It's just that 2 of our files link to the same RB page, instead of each separate one.

[Orion Pobursky]

I was going off the fact that the OP stated that RB has a wrong BL reference. The PT just blindly trusts RB is correct.

[Chris Böhnke]

Oh, I misread that.

Though, the link from Rebrickable to Bricklink is working correctly for me.