Part 3049 issue


Part 3049 issue
#1
For reference:
Rebrickable: https://rebrickable.com/parts/3049d/slop...d-holder/#
Bricklink: https://www.bricklink.com/TL/10698.jpg

Our 'a' version matches their 'a'. However, our 'c' is their 'b' and our 'b' doesn't seem to exist.
Reply
RE: Part 3049 issue
#2
(2020-01-07, 19:13)Orion Pobursky Wrote: For reference:
Rebrickable: https://rebrickable.com/parts/3049d/slop...d-holder/#
Bricklink: https://www.bricklink.com/TL/10698.jpg

Our 'a' version matches their 'a'. However, our 'c' is their 'b' and our 'b' doesn't seem to exist.

FYI: I’m already working on our ‘d’ (their ‘c’) variant.
Reply
RE: Part 3049 issue
#3
(2020-01-07, 19:29)Orion Pobursky Wrote: FYI: I’m already working on our ‘d’ (their ‘c’) variant.

Not finding this on the PT, I went ahead and submitted 3049d (which is now matched by RB's numbering, but not BL's).
Reply
RE: Part 3049 issue
#4
(2020-04-25, 3:52)N. W. Perry Wrote: Not finding this on the PT, I went ahead and submitted 3049d (which is now matched by RB's numbering, but not BL's).

Thanks for that. I started it, got distracted, and never finished.
Reply
RE: Part 3049 issue
#5
(2020-01-07, 19:13)Orion Pobursky Wrote: our 'b' doesn't seem to exist.

Do anyone have or have seen images of the b-version?
What do we do if it is a ghost part?
Reply
RE: Part 3049 issue
#6
(2020-04-29, 17:55)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: Do anyone have or have seen images of the b-version?
What do we do if it is a ghost part?

Unless someone can come up with a real life example, I think it should be obsoleted.
Reply
RE: Part 3049 issue
#7
I didn't bother with this, since I was just matching the existing variants, but in real life the pointy part of this part should be blunted a little bit. That might look a bit funny in LDraw, though…?
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)