+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html)
+--- Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: Part 3049 issue (/thread-23822.html)
Part 3049 issue - Orion Pobursky - 2020-01-07
For reference:
Rebrickable: https://rebrickable.com/parts/3049d/slope-45-2-x-1-double-inverted-with-bottom-stud-holder/#
Bricklink: https://www.bricklink.com/TL/10698.jpg
Our 'a' version matches their 'a'. However, our 'c' is their 'b' and our 'b' doesn't seem to exist.
RE: Part 3049 issue - Orion Pobursky - 2020-01-07
(2020-01-07, 19:13)Orion Pobursky Wrote: For reference:
Rebrickable: https://rebrickable.com/parts/3049d/slope-45-2-x-1-double-inverted-with-bottom-stud-holder/#
Bricklink: https://www.bricklink.com/TL/10698.jpg
Our 'a' version matches their 'a'. However, our 'c' is their 'b' and our 'b' doesn't seem to exist.
FYI: I’m already working on our ‘d’ (their ‘c’) variant.
RE: Part 3049 issue - N. W. Perry - 2020-04-25
(2020-01-07, 19:29)Orion Pobursky Wrote: FYI: I’m already working on our ‘d’ (their ‘c’) variant.
Not finding this on the PT, I went ahead and submitted 3049d (which is now matched by RB's numbering, but not BL's).
RE: Part 3049 issue - Orion Pobursky - 2020-04-25
(2020-04-25, 3:52)N. W. Perry Wrote: Not finding this on the PT, I went ahead and submitted 3049d (which is now matched by RB's numbering, but not BL's).
Thanks for that. I started it, got distracted, and never finished.
RE: Part 3049 issue - Magnus Forsberg - 2020-04-29
(2020-01-07, 19:13)Orion Pobursky Wrote: our 'b' doesn't seem to exist.
Do anyone have or have seen images of the b-version?
What do we do if it is a ghost part?
RE: Part 3049 issue - Orion Pobursky - 2020-04-29
(2020-04-29, 17:55)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: Do anyone have or have seen images of the b-version?
What do we do if it is a ghost part?
Unless someone can come up with a real life example, I think it should be obsoleted.
RE: Part 3049 issue - N. W. Perry - 2020-05-06
I didn't bother with this, since I was just matching the existing variants, but in real life the pointy part of this part should be blunted a little bit. That might look a bit funny in LDraw, though…?