LDraw.org Discussion Forums

For reference:
Rebrickable: https://rebrickable.com/parts/3049d/slop...d-holder/#
Bricklink: https://www.bricklink.com/TL/10698.jpg

Our 'a' version matches their 'a'. However, our 'c' is their 'b' and our 'b' doesn't seem to exist.

(2020-01-07, 19:13)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]For reference:
Rebrickable: https://rebrickable.com/parts/3049d/slop...d-holder/#
Bricklink: https://www.bricklink.com/TL/10698.jpg

Our 'a' version matches their 'a'. However, our 'c' is their 'b' and our 'b' doesn't seem to exist.

FYI: I’m already working on our ‘d’ (their ‘c’) variant.

(2020-01-07, 19:29)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]FYI: I’m already working on our ‘d’ (their ‘c’) variant.

Not finding this on the PT, I went ahead and submitted 3049d (which is now matched by RB's numbering, but not BL's).

(2020-04-25, 3:52)N. W. Perry Wrote: [ -> ]Not finding this on the PT, I went ahead and submitted 3049d (which is now matched by RB's numbering, but not BL's).

Thanks for that. I started it, got distracted, and never finished.

(2020-01-07, 19:13)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]our 'b' doesn't seem to exist.

Do anyone have or have seen images of the b-version?
What do we do if it is a ghost part?

(2020-04-29, 17:55)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: [ -> ]Do anyone have or have seen images of the b-version?
What do we do if it is a ghost part?

Unless someone can come up with a real life example, I think it should be obsoleted.

I didn't bother with this, since I was just matching the existing variants, but in real life the pointy part of this part should be blunted a little bit. That might look a bit funny in LDraw, though…?