LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans


RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans
(2017-11-13, 20:37)David Manley Wrote: I think you may find that was perhaps Willy's way of saying he doesn't like my approach in naming sub-models rather than actually advocating a return to 8.3 filenames.
Ah missed that Smile

(2017-11-13, 22:07)Willy Tschager Wrote: I'm fine with your naming for what it's worth. I find it absurd that such a fine and powerful tool like LDCad requires a naming convention at all. The 10243 - Parisian Restaurant I'm currently working on is named 10243 - Ground floor - Column, 10243 -  First floor - Balcony, 10243 - Roof and I don't see why I should name them differently just because a prog cannot handle them.
It still needs rules for sorting, current version uses natural sorting on description by default (so "1, 2, 10, 11, 20" without the need of a 0 prefix for single digits).

Maybe sort on keywords?, or introduce a new meta for forcing sorting?
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: LDCad 1.6 ROTSTEP feedback - by TestOne - 2016-02-25, 22:56
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Kai - 2016-05-23, 18:48
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Art - 2016-08-11, 12:56
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Art - 2016-08-12, 7:29
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Karen M - 2017-10-24, 10:28
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Roland Melkert - 2017-11-13, 22:19

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)