LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans


RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans
(2017-11-13, 20:37)David Manley Wrote:
(2017-11-13, 19:29)Roland Melkert Wrote: Why?

Roland,

I think you may find that was perhaps Willy's way of saying he doesn't like my approach in naming sub-models rather than actually advocating a return to 8.3 filenames.

David

I'm fine with your naming for what it's worth. I find it absurd that such a fine and powerful tool like LDCad requires a naming convention at all. The 10243 - Parisian Restaurant I'm currently working on is named 10243 - Ground floor - Column, 10243 -  First floor - Balcony, 10243 - Roof and I don't see why I should name them differently just because a prog cannot handle them.

w.
LEGO ergo sum
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: LDCad 1.6 ROTSTEP feedback - by TestOne - 2016-02-25, 22:56
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Kai - 2016-05-23, 18:48
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Art - 2016-08-11, 12:56
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Art - 2016-08-12, 7:29
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Karen M - 2017-10-24, 10:28
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Willy Tschager - 2017-11-13, 22:07

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)