RE: (unofficial) Part 7684 - broken in both LDView and MLCad
Yesterday, 13:39 (This post was last modified: Yesterday, 13:41 by tom alphin.)
Yesterday, 13:39 (This post was last modified: Yesterday, 13:41 by tom alphin.)
(Yesterday, 6:13)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: Don't you mean the 's' files?
Somewhere a choice must be made: Should one or the other version of a file with the same name be used?
How does LdView handle that question?
I know from experince that MLCad doesn't handle it correctly. That's one of the reasons I stopped using it.
Yes, I misspoke - I meant the 's' files.
LDView also handles it incorrectly - see previous photo. It uses the official one, even if a newer s/ file exists in the unofficial folder.
This is why I proposed a workaround, adding a postfix for the unofficial file, until it is merged into main.