RCX 1.0/1.5/2.0 Modules


RE: RCX 1.0/1.5/2.0 Modules
#26
OK,
76113 is only 32058p01 + 32108

Then, IMHO, we should renumber current file 883.dat  to 76113c01.dat.

But using 32374p01c01 and 32374p02c01 on the top part without AC socket create a problem.
I need a file to assemble the top part RCX 1.5 and 2.0. It would have to be 32374p01c01c01. Stupid.

Should I use a u-number on the top with glass, and then create uXXXXc01 as the assembly?
Or, do I keep 32374p02c01 as the top with glass, and use uXXXX on the assembly?
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RCX 1.0/1.5/2.0 Modules - by Orion Pobursky - 2022-07-18, 14:20
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Magnus Forsberg - 2022-07-18, 16:45
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Orion Pobursky - 2022-07-18, 17:07
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Magnus Forsberg - 2022-07-18, 17:23
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Magnus Forsberg - 2022-07-21, 20:40
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Orion Pobursky - 2022-07-21, 20:51
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Orion Pobursky - 2022-07-21, 21:42
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Max Murtazin - 2022-07-21, 21:43
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Philippe Hurbain - 2022-07-18, 19:43
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Magnus Forsberg - 2022-07-18, 20:05
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Max Murtazin - 2022-07-18, 21:17
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Orion Pobursky - 2022-07-18, 21:24
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Magnus Forsberg - 2022-07-20, 12:58
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Orion Pobursky - 2022-07-20, 13:48
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Orion Pobursky - 2022-07-19, 2:22
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Max Murtazin - 2022-07-19, 2:28
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Magnus Forsberg - 2022-07-19, 15:07
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Orion Pobursky - 2022-07-19, 23:29
RE: 884, RCX 1.0 Module - by Magnus Forsberg - 2022-07-20, 14:04
RE: RCX 1.0/1.5/2.0 Modules - by Magnus Forsberg - 2022-09-07, 16:57

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)