Part 32289b modifications and new parts

[Javier Orquera]

Javier,

looks good to me, presuming you add the missing edges such as these:

2 4 -22 74 32 -22 96 32
2 4 -17.48 74.78 60 -17.74 76 60
2 4 0 48 -205.125 -6.1232 49.2176 -205.125
2 4 6.1232 49.2176 -205.125 0 48 -205.125

...

or eliminating these:

2 24 0 44 -78.875 0 48 -78.875
2 24 -36 44 -78.875 -36 48 -78.875
...

* Also the whole naming with the missing s\ has to be fixed.

* I cannot see any reason for not inlining s\32289as02.dat or s\32289bs02.dat (which BTW is almost coming through the surface) into the main part a and b.

* It is clear to me that you're a very talented part author for the simple fact that you have the courage to tackle such a monster but I still don't get your tendency for T-Junctions such as this:

4 4 -34 92 31 -34 92 28 -22 92 28 -22 92 31
4 4 -36 92 28 -34 92 28 -34 92 30 -36 92 30
4 4 -36 92 28 -36 92 13 0 92 13 0 92 28
4 4 -16 92 13 -16 92 8 0 92 8 0 92 13
4 4 -16 92 8 -16 92 -13 0 92 -13 0 92 8
4 4 -40 92 8 -40 92 -13 -32 92 -13 -32 92 8
4 4 -36 92 13 -36 92 8 -32 92 8 -32 92 13


which I would build with this code:

4 1 -32 92 13 -34 92 30 -36 92 30 -36 92 13
4 1 -22 92 28 -34 92 30 -32 92 13 -16 92 13
4 1 -22 92 28 -16 92 13 0 92 13 0 92 28
4 1 -36 92 8 -40 92 8 -40 92 -13 -32 92 -13
4 1 -34 92 30 -22 92 28 -22 92 31 -34 92 31
4 1 -16 92 13 -16 92 -13 0 92 -13 0 92 13
4 1 -36 92 13 -36 92 8 -32 92 -13 -32 92 13


Just out of curiosity. What tools are you using for authoring?

w.

1. About the inlining: Are you suggesting to add the missing edges to the primary subfile 32289s01?
   
2. "The whole naming with the missing s\": it's the 32289s01 or another file?
   
3. Thank you for your words but I don't think I'm talented; I just trying to correct something bad. The t-junction problem: if it is the s\32289as01, honestly, it's a copy and paste from the already submitted s/32289as01, with the corresponding deletions and minor adjustments.
   

Almost forgot: I use LDPE