(2020-05-07, 20:11)Javier Orquera Wrote: Hello to all.
First, if this post are wrong placed, move it to the proper place.
 
I made several changes to the part 32289b.dat (that I'm working on), so I attach the files with other numbers and new ones:
1) 32289bs01a.dat: modified with battery form and placeholder to the rear axle
2) u9510a.dat: the idea is to substitute the one in the PT.
3) 13.dat: new file; number and name are with the purpose to identify it, so you can suggest new ones. Also, it is my mane target.
4) 32289b_a: these one have bottom inside to the battery form and the concavity for part 914.dat (I am thinking if leave it as the original submitted or these one; what do you think? Comment)

I decide these before I change the original files in case you dislike the changes and the new parts.

(2021-03-05, 14:41)Willy Tschager Wrote: Javier,

looks good to me, presuming you add the missing edges such as these:

2 4 -22 74 32 -22 96 32
2 4 -17.48 74.78 60 -17.74 76 60
2 4 0 48 -205.125 -6.1232 49.2176 -205.125
2 4 6.1232 49.2176 -205.125 0 48 -205.125

...

or eliminating these:

2 24 0 44 -78.875 0 48 -78.875
2 24 -36 44 -78.875 -36 48 -78.875
...

* Also the whole naming with the missing s\ has to be fixed.

* I cannot see any reason for not inlining s\32289as02.dat or s\32289bs02.dat (which BTW is almost coming through the surface) into the main part a and b.

* It is clear to me that you're a very talented part author for the simple fact that you have the courage to tackle such a monster but I still don't get your tendency for T-Junctions such as this:

4 4 -34 92 31 -34 92 28 -22 92 28 -22 92 31
4 4 -36 92 28 -34 92 28 -34 92 30 -36 92 30
4 4 -36 92 28 -36 92 13 0 92 13 0 92 28
4 4 -16 92 13 -16 92 8 0 92 8 0 92 13
4 4 -16 92 8 -16 92 -13 0 92 -13 0 92 8
4 4 -40 92 8 -40 92 -13 -32 92 -13 -32 92 8
4 4 -36 92 13 -36 92 8 -32 92 8 -32 92 13


which I would build with this code:

4 1 -32 92 13 -34 92 30 -36 92 30 -36 92 13
4 1 -22 92 28 -34 92 30 -32 92 13 -16 92 13
4 1 -22 92 28 -16 92 13 0 92 13 0 92 28
4 1 -36 92 8 -40 92 8 -40 92 -13 -32 92 -13
4 1 -34 92 30 -22 92 28 -22 92 31 -34 92 31
4 1 -16 92 13 -16 92 -13 0 92 -13 0 92 13
4 1 -36 92 13 -36 92 8 -32 92 -13 -32 92 13


Just out of curiosity. What tools are you using for authoring?

w.

1. About the inlining: Are you suggesting to add the missing edges to the primary subfile 32289s01?
   
2. "The whole naming with the missing s\": it's the 32289s01 or another file?
   
3. Thank you for your words but I don't think I'm talented; I just trying to correct something bad. The t-junction problem: if it is the s\32289as01, honestly, it's a copy and paste from the already submitted s/32289as01, with the corresponding deletions and minor adjustments.
   

(2021-03-05, 18:21)Javier Orquera Wrote:

1. About the inlining: Are you suggesting to add the missing edges to the primary subfile 32289s01?
   
2. "The whole naming with the missing s\": it's the 32289s01 or another file?
   
3. Thank you for your words but I don't think I'm talented; I just trying to correct something bad. The t-junction problem: if it is the s\32289as01, honestly, it's a copy and paste from the already submitted s/32289as01, with the corresponding deletions and minor adjustments.
   

Almost forgot: I use LDPE

(2021-03-08, 2:32)Javier Orquera Wrote: Here it is the files with the changes.

Magnus Forsberg Wrote:Proposed new structure of these motors.
I'm not sure of the red partnumbers. Since the uncoloured part is 32288, maybe the assembly should use that number as base.

1. I need images of the inside of real life part 32288 to know where the screws go in order to correct the respective file.
   
2. Also, need images of the motor holder with the dimension to model it.
   

(2022-09-13, 23:09)Javier Orquera Wrote: I did the folowing "unification" of the file. Hope it can be submited to the PT.

(2022-09-16, 23:20)Javier Orquera Wrote: I updated the unification files to be checked/reviewed.