(2020-01-07, 19:29)Orion Pobursky Wrote: FYI: I’m already working on our ‘d’ (their ‘c’) variant.
Not finding this on the PT, I went ahead and submitted 3049d (which is now matched by RB's numbering, but not BL's).
Part 3049 issue
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Part 3049 issue - by Orion Pobursky - 2020-01-07, 19:13
RE: Part 3049 issue - by Orion Pobursky - 2020-01-07, 19:29
RE: Part 3049 issue - by N. W. Perry - 2020-04-25, 3:52
RE: Part 3049 issue - by Orion Pobursky - 2020-04-25, 5:34
RE: Part 3049 issue - by Magnus Forsberg - 2020-04-29, 17:55
RE: Part 3049 issue - by Orion Pobursky - 2020-04-29, 18:40
RE: Part 3049 issue - by N. W. Perry - 2020-05-06, 16:52
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)