LDraw.org Discussion Forums › General › Parts Tracker Discussion v
[Solved] Part 41663.dat

Solved Part 41663.dat


Orion Pobursky Online
Administrator *******
Administrators App Developers James Jessiman Memorial PTAdmin PTSubmit Standards Board Steering Committee
Posts: 4,700
Threads: 658
Joined: Jul 2011
Part 41663.dat
#1
2022-01-20, 5:03 (This post was last modified: 2022-01-21, 20:59 by Orion Pobursky.)
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c.../41663.dat

In regards to arezey's comment, should we rename these parts to "Constraction Shield ..." or stick with "Technic Shield ..."?
Find
Max Martin Richter Offline
Administrator *******
Administrators PTSubmit Steering Committee
Posts: 1,036
Threads: 66
Joined: Jul 2011
RE: Part 41663.dat
#2
2022-01-20, 12:15
(2022-01-20, 5:03)Orion Pobursky Wrote: https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c.../41663.dat

In regards to arezey's comment, should we rename these parts to "Constraction Shield ..." or stick with "Technic Shield ..."?

As I can’t remember any use in a ordinary technic set I would go for constraction shield
Find
Philippe Hurbain Offline
Administrator *******
Administrators App Developers James Jessiman Memorial PTSubmit Steering Committee
Posts: 5,028
Threads: 170
Joined: Jul 2011
RE: Part 41663.dat
#3
2022-01-20, 12:39
(2022-01-20, 12:15)Max Martin Richter Wrote: As I can’t remember any use in a ordinary technic set I would go for constraction shield
Yes!
Website Find
Magnus Forsberg Offline
LDraw.org Moderator ******
James Jessiman Memorial PTSubmit
Posts: 1,981
Threads: 74
Joined: Dec 2011
RE: Part 41663.dat
#4
2022-01-20, 16:05
(2022-01-20, 12:39)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: Yes!

I agree.
Find
Orion Pobursky Online
Administrator *******
Administrators App Developers James Jessiman Memorial PTAdmin PTSubmit Standards Board Steering Committee
Posts: 4,700
Threads: 658
Joined: Jul 2011
RE: Part 41663.dat
#5
2022-01-20, 16:40
There's enough consensus here. The change will be made.
Find
Orion Pobursky Online
Administrator *******
Administrators App Developers James Jessiman Memorial PTAdmin PTSubmit Standards Board Steering Committee
Posts: 4,700
Threads: 658
Joined: Jul 2011
RE: Part 41663.dat
#6
2022-01-20, 17:23
What about this one:
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c.../98566.dat
Find
Philippe Hurbain Offline
Administrator *******
Administrators App Developers James Jessiman Memorial PTSubmit Steering Committee
Posts: 5,028
Threads: 170
Joined: Jul 2011
RE: Part 41663.dat
#7
2022-01-20, 17:28 (This post was last modified: 2022-01-20, 17:32 by Philippe Hurbain.)
(2022-01-20, 17:23)Orion Pobursky Wrote: What about this one:
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c.../98566.dat
ditto. I think that even if they do have Technic connections (and even if used later in some Technic sets), weird parts born in Slizers/Bionicle/Hero factory etc should be in Constraction category.
Website Find
Orion Pobursky Online
Administrator *******
Administrators App Developers James Jessiman Memorial PTAdmin PTSubmit Standards Board Steering Committee
Posts: 4,700
Threads: 658
Joined: Jul 2011
RE: Part 41663.dat
#8
2022-01-20, 17:45
(2022-01-20, 17:28)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: ditto. I think that even if they do have Technic connections (and even if used later in some Technic sets), weird parts born in Slizers/Bionicle/Hero factory etc should be in Constraction category.

Sounds like a larger project. I'll start a new thread once I investigate how many parts I think are affected.
Find
Max Martin Richter Offline
Administrator *******
Administrators PTSubmit Steering Committee
Posts: 1,036
Threads: 66
Joined: Jul 2011
RE: Part 41663.dat
#9
2022-01-20, 17:58
(2022-01-20, 17:28)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: ditto. I think that even if they do have Technic connections (and even if used later in some Technic sets), weird parts born in Slizers/Bionicle/Hero factory etc should be in Constraction category.

+1
Find
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Thread Closed 


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)