Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 4,970
» Latest member: adam21
» Forum threads: 5,973
» Forum posts: 50,569
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 595 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 591 Guest(s) Baidu, Bing, Google, Yandex
|
|
|
Putting comments into LDraw projects... |
Posted by: Ahmed Elhassan - 2013-07-05, 12:59 - Forum: General LDraw.org Discussion
- Replies (6)
|
 |
What's the point of adding comments into an LDraw project anyway? I've noticed that comments inserted into a project don't appear anywhere in the graphical representation of the model that they have been inserted into. They also don't seem to be visible in the graphical representations of any assembly instructions built via LPub either.
The only place where I have actually seen comments listed is in the meta commands table in LPub and in the commands window of LDraw, where they would be of no actual usefulness if they are intended to point out important information on printed instructions for a model's physical assembly.
Here is my dilemma in regards to this. When replicating an official Lego model that I have purchase for the purpose of customization or working on designing an MOC project, I sometimes find that a piece I need or want to use doesn't yet exist in LDraw. I currently have all parts available for LDraw. I took the time to download the entire un-official parts zip file and add all it's contents to LDraw's parts library. In spots where I can't find a given piece, I use a placeholder piece as a substitute for it.
That in turn creates a problem for me. I need to indicate on the assembly instructions which placeholder piece corresponds to which actual piece on the model. At first I considered using comments, but found that they don't appear in the instructions. I need a way to point this out somehow, but I am currently at a loss for a method. I am trying to think of one, but haven't been able to come up with a way so far.
Anyone know if there is a way to make comments inserted in an LDraw project actually appear in the graphical image representing it in LDraw and LPub?
|
|
|
Lpub : steps not correctly displayed in a submodel... |
Posted by: Fabrice Vion - 2013-07-03, 18:43 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (7)
|
 |
Hello,
I have a problem viewing a model in Lpub. In a 17 steps submodel the 9 first steps are correctly displayed but from the 10th ones only the bill of material continue tu appear, not the model.
When I open this submodel directly in Lpub it's well displayed.
Does someone have already see this problem, or have an idea of the root cause ?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Fabrice
|
|
|
help with MPD |
Posted by: Nathan S - 2013-07-01, 4:46 - Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Maybe I have completely missed a process in MLCad, but here is my question:
When placing multiple models into one file, is there a way to make it so that all of the parts of each model show in the final MPD vs just the sub-models? Or is the only way to have just the submodels show with no individual parts listed.
|
|
|
Coder looking to help out |
Posted by: Robert Leahey - 2013-06-26, 2:37 - Forum: All Other Programs.
- Replies (8)
|
 |
Greetings all,
I m a long-time LDraw consumer, and an even longer-time software developer (currently working in C#.NET), and was wondering about any possible software development tasks I might try to help out with.
i.e. are there any pressing software needs, utilities missing from the LDraw family, tools that users regularly request, etc? Something I might be able to code in my small amounts of free time?
I'm a hard-core C# (and Delphi) object-oriented developer, but also have a great deal of experience in front ends as a UX specialist and graphic designer (so I'm good at UI layouts and creating little icons and that).
So...
- Developers: if you can use me, just let me know.
- Users: if you have a desire for some app, utility, or editor that doesn't yet exist, drop me a suggestion, please.
For instance, my dream LDraw project would be to recreate the MLCAD UI for improved usability, but I gather that's not going to happen... ;-)
|
|
|
|