71613/30346c01 too high?!

[Sylvain Sauvage]

Hi again,

Another (old) error brought out on the Studio forums: part

71613 Electric Light & Sound Brick  4 x 12 x  2 Laser Drill  (formerly and for BL 30346c01) 

is too high by 1 plate.
As the description says it’s supposed to be 2 bricks high… but the 3D model is 1 plate more.

User provided a pic (Google drive, link in the post) of the real part.

[Gerald Lasser]

Bottom half looks ok, only top is too tall, isn'T it?

.. and it is a 22 years old part...

[Magnus Forsberg]

Bottom half looks ok, only top is too tall, isn'T it?

.. and it is a 22 years old part...

Think it will be hard to correct without having the real part in hand. What's wrong? Which section is correct?

[Sylvain Sauvage]

Yep, old and rare part.
I’ll see if the original reporter can provide more pics….

[Jeff Jones]

also it seems like both the drill thing on the front i a plate high and the drill holes on the bottom are missing

since its a 2.0 part requires rewrite btw

[Pawel2]

Hello I'm RealTP
I was sent here to post more pics regarding my issue with the piece in Studio

here are more pics for, i added extra bricks so that its easier to tell what i mean 
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1...sp=sharing

[Philippe Hurbain]

Hello I'm RealTP
I was sent here to post more pics regarding my issue with the piece in Studio

here are more pics for, i added extra bricks so that its easier to tell what i mean 
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1...sp=sharing

Thanks!
For some reason I can't see or download one of the images (20250517_172424.jpg), file seems corrupted. Can you check, please?

[Pawel2]

Thanks!
For some reason I can't see or download one of the images (20250517_172424.jpg), file seems corrupted. Can you check, please?

I'll try but google drive is very finnicky and refuses to upload files on mobile sometimes

[Rene Rechthaler]

   
added a line to compare
looks like there is really an error...
the original part is more "squished" at the slopes.
where is the original part data from? (digital/measured?)

[Orion Pobursky]

Given the part was edited in 2013 by someone who wasn't the original author, it very likely that this is a very old submission and the "data source" was manual measurements.

[Orion Pobursky]

Found in the sub parts, submitted in 2002 so the very beginning of the Parts Tracker.